 | United States Congress. House. Banking and Currency Committee - 1968 - 678 pages
...Impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any right secured and protected by the Constitution ; and in...control of the law, and not to the direction of the President." 1 This principle has long been recognized by the courts, and its applicability is by no... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency - Banking law - 1968 - 174 pages
...impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any right secured and protected by the Constitution ; and in...control of the law, and not to the direction of the President.1 This principle has long been recognized by the courts, and its applicability is by no means... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs - 1971 - 234 pages
...that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control ofthe law, and not to the direction of the president. It was urged at the bar, that the postmastergeneral... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1971 - 668 pages
...may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the constitution ... in such cases, the duty and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control oí the law, and not to the direction of the President . . . "To contend that the obligation imposed... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - Labor policy - 1973 - 1252 pages
...that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law, and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case where the dutr enjoined is of a mere ministerial character."... | |
| |
There are certain political duties imposed upon many officers in the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any... 
