 | 1911 - 854 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President. After citing the report of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate upon its investigation... | |
 | Ernst Freund - Administrative law - 1911 - 718 pages
...that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper. which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law, and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case, where the duty enjoined is of a mere ministerial character.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules - Antitrust law - 1911 - 134 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President." After citing the report of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate upon its" investigation... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules - Trusts, Industrial - 1911 - 72 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President." After citing the report of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate upon its investigation... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1911 - 120 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think rTTODer which isnot repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President. After citing the report of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate upon its investigation... | |
 | United States - Military law - 1915 - 816 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which Is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President, and this is emphatically the case whore the duty is of a ministerial character. (Kendall... | |
 | Eugene Wambaugh - Constitutional law - 1915 - 1106 pages
...that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty They may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...and responsibility grow out of and are subject; to fll° control of the law, and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case,... | |
 | United States - Law - 1916 - 1254 pages
...Congress. — Congress can impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not &8 ,5BY 4g = \ q ~ЂBէZ 2 10 PG ...# ;E 샇| Z ȧ? } q NS a> ܳ ݚ g >M ] UG y President. Kendall v. US (1838) 12 Pet. 524, 610, 9 L. Ed. 1181. 232 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS §232 The... | |
 | Reinhold Klotz - German language - 1916 - 706 pages
...that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law, and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case, where the duty enjoined is of a mere ministerial character."... | |
 | United States - Military law - 1917 - 1716 pages
...that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the...control of the law and not to the direction of the President, and this is emphatically the case where the duty is of a ministerial character. (Kendall... | |
| |
There are certain political duties imposed upon many officers in the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any... 
