...or to extend credit on the faith or such holding out, is, as in other cases of estoppels in pais, a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. (Syllabus by the Court) Appeal from circuit court, Putnam county; James M. Baker, Judge. Action by...

...Mallia" differ only in spelling, hut have the same sound; whether they are thus sounded alike is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. 11 Gray, 322. ifr. Frank J. Buker, County Attorney, for the Slate. Virgin, J., delivered the opinion...

...agent, or whether JS Anderson held himself out as a partner In business with LB Anderson, were questions of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. A finding for the plaintiffs, Blass & Co., would have been sustained without hesitation. But there...

...business, whether it was leased by him for the company, or for his own private purposes, were questions of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. We cannot presume there was an omission of material testimony, and make the record's silence a predicate...

...closed. The claim made by the learned counsel for the appellant is that under the evidence it was a question of fact for the jury and not of law for the court, whether the possession of the defendant for twenty years and more was such an adverse possession as would bar the...

...refused. — Shinn v. State, 68 Ind. 423. 3. Whether certain labor on Sunday Is a work of necessity, is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court. — Edgerton v. State, 67 Ind. 588. 4. Under the corresponding section of the Act of 1852, it was helo...

...964 ; 7 So. Rep., 729. COCKRILL, CJ It was settled in the former appeal in this case that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, to determine whether the deceased, who was a country-reared lad of narrow experience, knew that service...

...assumed to pay the amount due the plaintiff under his contract: but t2) that this was an inference of fact for the jury and not of law for the Court, and it was error to instruct the jury that the law implied a promise to pay from these facts. Ibid....

...fraudulently or not, and the presumption that the alteration was made after the execution of the note is one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. In Wicker v. Pope, 12 Rich. (SC) 387, it was held that whether an instrument was altered or not is...

...delivered to the plaintiff. We do not agree with counsel in this contention, but think the question was one of fact for the jury and not of law for the court. The plaintiff was only fourteen years of age at the 4 her mother died. It is fairly inferable from...