 | Lainie Friedman Ross - Family & Relationships - 1998 - 228 pages
...'hard-core pornography', Justice Potter Stewart wrote: 'I shall not today attempt to define [that category] and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.' Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 US 184 (1964), cited in }. Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, ii:... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - History - 1999 - 756 pages
...faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable. I shall not today attempt to further define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced,...an impeachable offense, for me the logic applies: I know it when I see it. And on balance, given the totality of the wrongdoing and the totality of the... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Haye - Law - 2000 - 472 pages
...define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ['obscene']; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that." See Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184, 197... | |
 | Christopher A. Anzalone - 2000 - 422 pages
...further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that. Keywords: Legal guidelines. Motion pictures,... | |
 | Keith Busby, Catherine M. Jones - Literary Criticism - 2000 - 602 pages
...further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it...." (Jacobellis v. Ohio; Supreme Court of the United States; 378 US 184; March 26, 1963). Come si dovrebbe... | |
 | Jean Lipman-Blumen - Business & Economics - 2000 - 436 pages
...oft-quoted remark, Justice Potter Stewart said, "I shall not today attempt further to define [obscenity]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Jacobettis v. Ohio, 378 US, 184, p. 198, 1964 decision. 33. Badaracco and Ellsworth (1989). 34. For... | |
 | Edward Cohen - History - 2000 - 274 pages
...further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Concurring Opinion (p. 6) in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US l84, 84 S. Ct. l676 (l964). Aristotle similarly... | |
 | Janice Moore - Science - 2002 - 329 pages
...further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that." Jacobellis v Ohio, 378 US 184, 197; 84 S.... | |
 | Lainie Friedman Ross - Business & Economics - 2002 - 220 pages
...'hard-core pornography', Justice Porter Stewart wrote: 'I shall not today attempt to define [that category] and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when 1 see it.' Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 US 184 (1964), cited in J. Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal... | |
 | Stanley Allen Renshon, Deborah Welch Larson - Political Science - 2003 - 362 pages
...the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description," Stewart wrote, "and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."1 Good judgment is a bit like pornography.... | |
| |
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in... 
