 Constitution leads to the conclusion that no State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form, whether by way of duties laid on the transportation of the subjects of that commerce, or on the receipts derived from that transportation,...  Albany Law Journal - Page 981889Full view - About this book
 | James Schouler - Constitutional history - 1897 - 350 pages
...derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of canying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce, and amounts to a meddlesome regulation of it.6 Indeed, in all matters of consequence within the 1 9 Wheat. 1. 2 13 How.... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, William Wilcox Cooke, Joseph Brown Heiskell, Jere Baxter, Benjamin James Lea, George Wesley Pickle, Charles Theodore Cates, Frank Marian Thompson, Charles Le Sueur Cornelius, Roy Hood Beeler - Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 822 pages
...derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce, and...regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress. ' ' Lyng v. Michigan, 135 US, 166. Several cases involving the validity of State laws, whereby a license... | |
 | Ezra Parmalee Prentice, John Garret Egan - Constitutional law - 1898 - 470 pages
...commerce the State can lay no tax in any form, and the reason is that such tax is a burden on interstate commerce, and amounts to a regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress.1 In every case of this character the determining consideration is to be found in the effect... | |
 | Michigan. Attorney General's Office, Michigan. Department of Attorney General - 1899 - 188 pages
...derived from that transportation, or on the occupation of the business of carrying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce and...regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress. This question has, in numerous instances, been before the United States Supreme Court, and the principle... | |
 | Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1134 pages
...derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that ower confe q ' We do not think that the difficulty is at all obviated by the fact that the express company, as incidental... | |
 | Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1126 pages
...subjects of that commerce, or on the receipts derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, and the reason is that such taxatjon is a burden on that commerce, and amounts to a regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress."... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1020 pages
...receipts from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce, and...regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress": Lyng v. Michigan, 135 US 165, 10 Sup. Ct. Eep. 725; Leloup v. Mobile, 127 US 6-iO, 648, 8 Sup. Ci Eep.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1488 pages
...transportation or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that taxation ie a burden on that commerce a'nd amounts to a regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress. Lyngv. Michigan, 135 US 161 (34: 150), 3 Inters. Com. Rep. 143. A telegraph company is an agent of... | |
 | Economics - 1901 - 766 pages
...subjects of that commerce, or on the receipts derived from the transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, and the reason is that such taxation is a burden on the commerce and amounts to a regulation of it which belongs solely to Congress." However explicit... | |
 | Charles Henry Butler - Constitutional law - 1902 - 704 pages
...derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, for the reason that such taxation is a burden on that commerce, and...regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress.' Lgny vs. Michigan, 135 US 166. But if that power of regulation is absolutely unrestricted as respects... | |
| |
