Page images

gentleman precedence in our Factory above his seniors, and we have accordingly resolved that he be no longer a member of the Committee, but that he resume his former station in the Factory, and that he rank after Mr. Bannerman.

41. The Select Committee will then consist of Mr. Marjoribanks, Mr. Davis, and Mr. Daniell.

We are your loving friends,
(signed) W. Astell,

J. P. Muspratt,
R. Campbell,

C. E. Prescott,
H. Lindsay,

N. B. Edmonstone,
J. L. Lushington,

W. Young,
H. Alexander,

W. S. Clarke,
G. Raikes,

J. R. Carnac,
G. Lyall,

J. Baillie,
J. G. Ravenshaw, J. Morris.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]


A COPY of CHINA SEPARATE Letter, dated

the 18th April 1832, presented on the 18th May
1832, in obedience to an Order of the House of
Commons, dated the 15th May 1832.

(Mr. Rice.)

Orderci, by The House of Commons, to be Printed,

8 June 1832.


[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]


L I S T.

Page. No. 1. Copy of a Separate Letter from the Select Committee of Supracargoes in

China to the Court of Directors of the East India Company, dated 31st May 1831

- 3

No. 2. Copy of a Secret Letter from the Select Committee of Supracargoes in China

to the Court of Directors of the East India Company, dated 18th June 1831 6 No. 3. Copy of a Letter from the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the East India

Company to the Select Committee of Supracargoes in China, dated gth December 1831


- 11

No. 4. Copy of a Letter from the Court of Directors of the East India Company to the

Select Committee of Supracargoes in China, dated 13th January 1832
No. 5. Extracts from the China Consultations and other Documents relating to the

Despatches to and from China

- 20

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

No. 1. Select Committee of Supracargoes

to the Court of Directors,

31 May 1831.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

COPY of a Separate LETTER from the Select COMMITTEE of SUPRACARGOES

in China to the Court of Directors of the East India Company, dated 31st
May 1831.

(Separate Department.)
To the Honourable the Court of Directors of the United East India Company.

Honourable Şirs,
Par. 1. OUR last address was under date the 7th instant, and forwarded by the
Danish brig“ Nornen.”

2. We had then to notice to your Honourable Court the late death of the Hong
Merchant Woo Yay, in consequence of the rigour exercised towards him by the
Chinese authorities, under the plea that he had been “ traitorously" connected with
foreigners. Subsequent acts of the Canton government, we regret to say, have
proved their disposition to proceed to a more direct system of aggression unless
timely checked; and we can without difficulty perceive, in the tone and character of
their late measures, an overweening opinion of the extent to which these aggressions
may be carried without opposition on our part. The timely application of firm and
temperate remonstrances will, we trust, have the effect of opening their eyes to the
impolicy of such a course of proceeding, and prevent the infliction of further injuries
in our commercial relations with this country.

3. On the 12th instant a visit was made to our Factory at Canton by the Foo Yuen, accompanied by the Hoppo and a strong party of armed attendants. After a general inspection of the premises, during which the covers were torn down from the picture of his late Majesty, which was otherwise treated with indignity, summary orders were given for the destruction of the quay and the space connecting the Company Factory with the river. The head Linguist was at the same time put into chains in the public hall, and threatened with instant decapitation; while Howqua was ordered to prison, and only released, after being an hour upon his knees, at the intercession of the Hoppo.

4. On the receipt of this intelligence we considered it desirable that one or two members of the Committee should be on the spot as early as possible to communicate with the officers of government, and endeavour to prevent the progress of such outrages. Messrs. Daniell and Smith accordingly reached Canton on the 16th instant, when they found the work of destruction in rapid progress on our premises, and the Hong Merchants in a state of terror which seemed altogether to paralyze them, and which for the time rendered them entirely unavailable as the medium of a verbal communication with the government. Under such circumstances, those gentlemen were obliged to content themselves with drawing up a temperate written remonstrance, addressed to the Foo Yuen, which they delivered to the Merchants, with a desire that it might be delivered without delay.

5. On the 20th instant we received a copy of the proclamation recorded under that date, which, under the most favourable point of view, could be considered as no other than a systematic attack upon the security and respectability of our commerce. Of the eight proposed Regulations enumerated in that document there are some of minor import, symptomatic chiefly of the disposition of the Foo Yuen; but others your Honourable Court will perceive to be of such a nature that no considerations whatever could have justified our acquiescence in them, nor any measures but those of prompt and firm resistance have averted the fatal evils which they threatened to the trade. The guard of Chinese soldiers which is enjoined to be placed over each of our ships on arriving in port, would lead to the constant interference of these

« PreviousContinue »