« PreviousContinue »
AMERICAN QUARTERLY REVIEW.
Aar. I. CLASSICAL LEARNING.
1–sh Address delivered before the Phi Beta Kapps. Society of Harvard University, 28th offugust, 1834, on Classical Learning and Eloquence. By WILLIAM HowARP GARDINER, Counsellor at Law. Cambridge: 1834.
2.—A Discourse on the Studies of the University. By ADAM Songwick, M.A., F. R. S., &c. Woodwardian Professor and Film of Trinity College, Cambridge. Second Edition. Cambridge (Eng.): 1834.
3—4 Discourse pronounced at the Inauguration of the Zuthor as Eliot professor of Greek Literature ?” Harvard University. August 26th, 1834. By CoRNELIUS C. FELTON, A. M. Cambridge: 1834.
4–0ration on the Comparativ Elements and Dutys of Grecian and American Eloquence: Deliverd before the Erodelphian Society of Miami University, of Oaford, Ohio; on the 23d September, 1834: being their ninth annual celebration; with notes. By THOMAS SMITH GRIMKE, of Charleston, S. C. Cincinnati: 1834.
5–An Address delivered on Monday, December 22d, 1884, by Rev. John Ludlow, D. D., on the occasion of his Inauguration as Provost of the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: 1835.
We trust the time may one day arrive, though we may not
live to welcome it, when there shall be some prescription in fa
your of the wisdom of our forefathers—when the self-sufficienc
and arrogance of the present, will graciously yield a little deferWOL, XVII. —No. 33.
ence to the experience of the past, and when the elements of
* Witness the progress of Mormonism, and the blasphemous and impudent imposture of Matthias.
from uninformed and visionary jurisprudence, striving to adjust at a stroke, complicated and jarring elements. The anomalies of our situation are, we trust, more a subject of curiosity than apprehension. Yet they have thus far been overcome rather by the flexibility than the force of our institutions. A looker-on might suppose that we have enough to grapple with in the heterogeneous nature of our population, and the problems which the progress of government affords for our solution, without diverging any farther from old opinion, (the cohesive power, say what we may, that has thus far kept the world together,) upon subjects of a different character. We ought at least to learn the art of selfgovernment, before we attempt to revolutionize morals and literature, settling, if it be possible, one rock below the quicksand, for a safe and secure foundation. This versatility of mind, looking less to improvement than to alteration, and bending its energies agreeably to each new impulse, is the direct antagonist of social order. It tampers ignorantly with the most delicate elements, and foolishly rushes in “where angels fear to tread.” Society lives with it as in an agitated cauldron, where the lees are as frequently on the surface as the nobler ingredients. As we are more liable to its influences than any other nation, so in many respects we are worse provided against its effects. In Europe, there is a barrier over which Lycurgus himself, with a new code in his hand, would find it hard to climb. Established institutions are so interwoven with the tenure of property, and the long chain of private rights, that innovation, incautiously conducted, is revolution. We have no such check, and heaven forbid that we should have ; but it is earnestly to be desired, that we may acquire some of the caution which attends it. Better that there should exist some theoretical errors, than that fundamental doctrines should be kept forever Astir. The Locrian law is preferable to incessant uncertainty and change. It is a mistake to believe that any edifice can sustain continual alterations and substitutions, without being weakened. Doctrines abstractedly unexceptionable, may be ill adapted to a particular form of government, and yet, were society in the eggshell, they might be among those which it ought soonest to adopt on its advent. “Time,” says a favourite author, “ changes anomaly into system, and injury into right; examples beget custom, and custom ripens into law, and the doubtful precedent of one generation, becomes the fundamental maxim of another.” Ancient systems and opinions are valuable, not because they bring with them the sanction of a remote age, but because they are the product of the wisdom of many ages—an alluvion rich with the accretions of successive centuries. There is another feature in the national mind, the result of a Petuliar position and discipline, to which we must necessarily