What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
according action alleged amount answer Appeals application assessment authority bank benefit bill bonds cause charge Circuit Court claim clearing commission commissioner common Congress Constitution construction contract corporation Court of Appeals damages decided decision decree defendant delivered determined direct District duty effect entered entitled error established evidence execution existing fact filed follows further give given Government grant ground held improvements interest issued judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land lease lien limits March matter meaning mortgage necessary Ohio Opinion original owner paid parties patent payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings purchase question railroad railroad company Railway rates reason received record referred removed rendered respect result road rule secured ship Statement statute street suit Supreme Court taken thereof tion train trust tunnel United
Page 254 - And he would not for a while : but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man ; yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.
Page 733 - Now, Know ye, That the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in consideration of the premises, and in conformity, with the several Acts of Congress in such case made and provided, HAVE GIVEN AND GRANTED, and by these presents DO GIVE AND GRANT, unto the said Conrad B. Pack, and to his heirs, the said Tract above described...
Page 397 - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the Judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.
Page 640 - Commission, be authorized to charge less for longer than for shorter distances for the transportation of passengers or property ; and the Commission may from time to time prescribe the extent to which such designated common carrier may be relieved from the operation of this section of this act.
Page 479 - At a General Session of the Interstate Commerce Commission, held at its office in Washington, DC, on the 19th day of May AD 1914.
Page 645 - The schedules printed as aforesaid by any such common carrier shall plainly state the places upon its railroad between which property and passengers will be carried, and shall contain the classification of freight in force upon such railroad, and shall also state separately the terminal charges and any rules or regulations which in any wise change, affect, or determine any part or the aggregate of such aforesaid rates and fares and charges.
Page 640 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this Act to charge or receive any greater compensation in the aggregate for the transportation of passengers or of like kind of property, under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, for a shorter than for a longer distance over the same line, in the same direction, the shorter being included within the longer distance...
Page 643 - No common carrier subject to the provisions of this act shall charge or receive any greater compensation in the aggregate for the transportation of persons or of a like kind of property for a shorter than for a longer distance over the same line or route in the same direction...
Page 451 - ... like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic, under substantially similar circumstances and conditions.
Page 397 - In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to the point or question actually litigated and determined in the original action, not what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action.