The Debate over Corporate Social ResponsibilitySteven K. May, George Cheney, Juliet Roper Should business strive to be socially responsible, and if so, how? The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility updates and broadens the discussion of these questions by bringing together in one volume a variety of practical and theoretical perspectives on corporate social responsibility. It is perhaps the single most comprehensive volume available on the question of just how "social" business ought to be. The volume includes contributions from the fields of communication, business, law, sociology, political science, economics, accounting, and environmental studies. Moreover, it draws from experiences and examples from around the world, including but not limited to recent corporate scandals and controversies in the U.S. and Europe. A number of the chapters examine closely the basic assumptions underlying the philosophy of socially responsible business. Other chapters speak to the practical challenges and possibilities for corporate social responsiblilty in the twenty-first century. One of the most distinctive features of the book is its coverage of the very ways that the issue of corporate social responsibility has been defined, shaped, and discussed in the past four decades. That is, the editors and many of the authors are attuned to the persuasive strategies and formulations used to talk about socially responsible business, and demonstrate why the talk matters. For example, the book offers a careful analysis of how certain values have become associated with the business enterprise and how particular economic and political positions have been established by and for business. This book will be of great interest to scholars, business leaders, graduate students, and others interested in the contours of the debate over what role large-scale corporate commerce should take in the future of the industrialized world. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 91
Page vi
... moral philosophy, institutional economics, and management 2. To perform critical rhetorical analysis on the discourses in the debate over CSR in search of dichotomies and oppositions stemming from the 19th century Victorian era: public ...
... moral philosophy, institutional economics, and management 2. To perform critical rhetorical analysis on the discourses in the debate over CSR in search of dichotomies and oppositions stemming from the 19th century Victorian era: public ...
Page xi
... Corporate Social Responsibility/Corporate Moral Responsibility: Is There a Difference and the Difference It Makes 459 Patricia H. Werhane Index 475 This page intentionally left blank THE DEBATE OVER CORPORATE SOCIAL Contents xi.
... Corporate Social Responsibility/Corporate Moral Responsibility: Is There a Difference and the Difference It Makes 459 Patricia H. Werhane Index 475 This page intentionally left blank THE DEBATE OVER CORPORATE SOCIAL Contents xi.
Page xxi
... Moral Imagination and Managerial Decision-Making (1999), and Employment and Employee Rights (2003, with Tara J ... moral markets' and 'moral managers', and the application of Austrian economics to organization studies. More generally ...
... Moral Imagination and Managerial Decision-Making (1999), and Employment and Employee Rights (2003, with Tara J ... moral markets' and 'moral managers', and the application of Austrian economics to organization studies. More generally ...
Page 8
... moral responsibilities. Some see the absence of “environmental” in the CSR set as a drawback (see Willard, 2002). On the other hand, many others see the word “social” as implicitly inclusive, relating to all aspects of society ...
... moral responsibilities. Some see the absence of “environmental” in the CSR set as a drawback (see Willard, 2002). On the other hand, many others see the word “social” as implicitly inclusive, relating to all aspects of society ...
Page 16
... moral authority to oversee the construction of the “good life” for the planet and its inhabitants (Boyd, 2000; Coombs, 1992; Suchman, 1995). In the following section, I make two arguments: first, that the modern corporation, as ...
... moral authority to oversee the construction of the “good life” for the planet and its inhabitants (Boyd, 2000; Coombs, 1992; Suchman, 1995). In the following section, I make two arguments: first, that the modern corporation, as ...
Contents
3 | |
13 | |
II Cases and Contexts | 57 |
III Legal Perspectives | 153 |
IV Economic Perspectives | 205 |
V Social Perspectives | 265 |
VI Environmental Perspectives | 319 |
The Contributions of Communication and Other Perspectives | 403 |
Index | 475 |
Other editions - View all
The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility Steve Kent May,Steve May,George Cheney,Juliet Roper Limited preview - 2007 |
The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility Steven K. May,George Cheney,Juliet Roper Limited preview - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
accounting action activists activities argue Asian behavior Boeing capital challenge chapter Cheney civil groups claims communication companies company’s concept concerns Confucian consumers context corporate citizenship corporate personhood corporate power corporate responsibility corporate social responsibility create critical culture decisions Deetz discourse economic employees Enron environment environmental ethical example ExxonMobil firms focus Friedman global Global Reporting Initiative green advertising greenwashing HIV/AIDS human rights impact indigenous individual industry initiatives institutions interests International involved issues Journal labor ment moral movement neoliberal NGOs Nigeria Nike Ogoni organizational organizations perspective political porate problems processes profit programs public relations regulation relationship rhetoric risk role shareholders Shell Shell Nigeria Singapore sponsibility stakeholders stances strategies sumers sustainable development sweatshop theory tion tive triple bottom line United Nations values Wal-Mart websites workers York