The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility
Steven K. May, George Cheney, Juliet Roper
Oxford University Press, Apr 19, 2007 - Business & Economics - 512 pages
Should business strive to be socially responsible, and if so, how? The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility updates and broadens the discussion of these questions by bringing together in one volume a variety of practical and theoretical perspectives on corporate social responsibility. It is perhaps the single most comprehensive volume available on the question of just how "social" business ought to be. The volume includes contributions from the fields of communication, business, law, sociology, political science, economics, accounting, and environmental studies. Moreover, it draws from experiences and examples from around the world, including but not limited to recent corporate scandals and controversies in the U.S. and Europe. A number of the chapters examine closely the basic assumptions underlying the philosophy of socially responsible business. Other chapters speak to the practical challenges and possibilities for corporate social responsiblilty in the twenty-first century. One of the most distinctive features of the book is its coverage of the very ways that the issue of corporate social responsibility has been defined, shaped, and discussed in the past four decades. That is, the editors and many of the authors are attuned to the persuasive strategies and formulations used to talk about socially responsible business, and demonstrate why the talk matters. For example, the book offers a careful analysis of how certain values have become associated with the business enterprise and how particular economic and political positions have been established by and for business. This book will be of great interest to scholars, business leaders, graduate students, and others interested in the contours of the debate over what role large-scale corporate commerce should take in the future of the industrialized world.
Results 1-5 of 5
In the discussion that follows, I have chosen the Enron corporation to
demonstrate examples of managerial discourse. To those who might see this
choice as kicking a company when it is down, I would confess that Enron is
certainly a selection ...
435), but according to Seeger and Ulmer (2003), that assumption was still alive
and well at Enron: The case of Enron . . . illustrates the consequences of
attending to a very narrow set of values and stakeholder concerns to the
exclusion of all ...
The case of Enron yields well-known and compelling examples of corporate
communication at its worst, including ... Arthur Andersen, Enron's auditing firm,
shredded Enron documents while on notice of a federal investigation (Oppel,
compromised by Enron's “high-handed behavior” (Parry, 2001). Human Rights
Watch (1999) reported that Enron misled the public from the start when the firm
boasted it had received no complaints during the legally required solicitation of ...
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
What people are saying - Write a review
A good resource indeed.
The difference between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility pg 267
The debate over corporate social responsibility by Steve Kent May, George Cheney, Juliet Roper pg 267 CR provides best hope addressing the problems of our times and providing a synergistic relation between csr & economic valibility . But different reforms provides different hopes and possibilities