Page images
PDF
EPUB

REGISTERED FOR TRANSMISSION ABROAD. THE MEDICAL PRESS AND CIRCULAR is published simultaneously in London, Edinburgh, and Dublin, every Wednesday morning. Price 5d. Stamped, 6d. By Post to Annual Subscribers, £1 2 6 If paid in advance,

1 1 8

almost venial; that "the duty appeared more suitable to a medical or non-commissioned officer," and so on.

Who shall decide when "doctors," and such doctors as these disagree? Let us see what say the published regulations on the subject. According to the twentieth section of those for hospitals, the officers of the medical department are charged not only with the medical care

**Post-Office Orders and Cheques to be drawn in favour of of the sick, but with the duty of recommending to com

CHARLES COOPER, 3 Lincoln place, Dublin ;
MACLACHLAN & STEWART, South Bridge, Edinburgh ;
A. A. TINDALL, 20 King William street, Strand, London.
Sole Agents for the United States.
MESSRS. KELLY and PIET, Baltimore.
Annual Subscription, post free, Ten Dollars.

manding officers whatever precautionary measures may conduce to the preservation of health of troops, and the mitigation or prevention of disease in the army. They are moreover directed weekly to inspect men for the detection of various ailments. During the prevalence of cholera they are required daily to inspect the men, and thus, it may be, detect the first indications of that disease among them; and they are, moreover, directed by the special instructions regarding that disease to devote their

The Medical Press and Circular. whole time to efforts for its prevention among them. It

"SALUS POPULI SUPREMA LEX." WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1868.

is well known that attention to clothing is among the important measures to be considered under such circumstances; so also is the wearing of flannel waist-belts; so cleanliness and free ventilation in barracks; cleanliness of the drains outside; cleanliness of latrines and urinals; removal of refuse; and all the other matters that come under the head of conservancy. Let us remember, however, that the functions of medical officers are not executive. Their proper functions cease when they have submitted their recommendations. It is, then, as much the duty of the officers appointed to give effect to their recommendations, to make certain that the one having reference to the wearing of cholera belts by the men is effectually carried out, as it is to see that all the other measures indicated are enforced. Carpet-knights and drawing-room lieutenants would most benefit the public service by adhering to those vocations for which Nature has been pleased to fit them.

SQUEAMISH LIEUTENANTS. TOWARDS the end of last May cholera threatened to occur in epidemic form among the troops quartered at Chinsurah, one of our military stations in Lower Bengal. Every ordinary precaution against such an emergency appears to have been taken by the medical officer in charge, and by the officer commanding the dépôt. Among other measures, Captain Brown issued an order that officers commanding sections should ascertain personally that each man of their sections respectively had a cholera belt on, and to note the same on the back of the parade state. To the thinking of most men, and certainly to that of all who have had experience in India, this order was a most judicious one, and the means of ensuring its execution effective. But a certain Lieutenant Macdonell was of a totally different opinion. He point blank refused to perform the duty. Soldiers might die of cholera, but a subaltern of ten years' standing should, according to his opinion, have a soul considerably above cholera belts, and so he returned the duty state of his section, but not until he had expressed his views upon it. "The duty," he was pleased to observe, "of inspecting half-naked soldiers is surely the duty of a non-physician should enter Parliament. commissioned officer, not the duty of a gentleman."

Unfortunately for him, a general court-martial before which he was arraigned held somewhat different views on the matter. The finding of that august tribunal declared the gallant officer guilty of conduct unbecoming his posi tion as such, and the Commander-in-Chief, in remarking upon the proceedings, observed that a more flagrant and deliberate instance of insolence and insubordination had never been brought to the notice of the superior military authorities; that the defence of the prisoner was utterly untenable; and that the order in question was in complete accord with the custom of the service in wellregulated regiments. Accordingly the "prisoner" was reprimanded in accordance with the sentence of the court. But the Lieutenant is not without his friends and supporters. The Army and Navy Gazette falls foul of Sir William Mansfield, observing, among other hard things, that the offence for which Lieutenant Macdonell was tried was, though still an offence, yet of a slightness

PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION.—

SIR D. CORRIGAN. THE name of our worthy medical baronet has been so freely mentioned in connection with the representation of Dublin and other constituencies that we think it well to state the two classes of reasons, totally outside political considerations, for which it is desirable that an able

1stly. Legislation on public health questions has been imperfectly and clumsily done in England: in Ireland it has been neglected. Surely, if able and energetic medical men had seats in the House of Commons, the cholera and cattle plague epidemics would have been more promply and effectively met; English workhouses would have been long since reformed; the machinery for the prevention of disease and for the ascertainment and registration of the causes of death would not still be directed by over a score of fragmentary and often contradictory acts; and their extension to Ireland would not have been delayed for twenty years after they had proved beneficial in the sister country.

2ndly. While clerical, legal, commercial, and agricultural interests are fully cared for, the medical profession has no efficient champion-witness the refusal of the Government to provide superannuation for disabled Poorlaw physicians. If the entire profession in Ireland were polled, we doubt that one of its members would deny

that Sir D. Corrigan was the most fitting representative who could be found for a university or medical corporation, if enfranchised.

His administrative ability has been proved at the governing boards of many of our charitable institutions, the Board of Health, the Medical Council, and several Royal Commissions. His splendid ability, strong common sense, and independent bearing have raised him to a most exalted position. He would enter Parliament for no selfish purpose, and the turmoil of an election would not have to be repeated, as would happen if a lawyer be chosen, for no lawyer could be selected save one whose ability had already put him in the groove for promotion, and Dublin City should never become as convenient a seat as that of the university, which has accommodated in succession so many Attorneys-General. It is said, however, that that learned constituency is likely to choose another class of representative in future.

Notes on
on Current Topics.

Tweedledum v. Tweedledee. CONCURRENT with the Peruvian convulsions of nature, the medical oracle has spoken. The mental tranquillity which the leading medical journal had shed upon the minds of the British nation in connection with the health of the sovereign is, at the bidding of Jupiter Tonans No. 2, cruelly dissipated, and grim despair, issuing from Great Queen street, Lincoln's Inn, has cast its gloom around the people of Europe.

We hasten to relieve the sickening apprehensions of loyal subjects by a friendly editorial whisper. We are in a position to state that her most gracious Majesty is decidedly better than when she was worse; and that in the absence of any reliable information whatever, the plush liveries of the Lancet and British Medical Journal may be refolded in their lining of silver paper and consigned to oblivion. Our own special Court flunkey has deferred producing his uniform, and anxiously awaits some inteligence more real than the guess shots of our contemporaries. Perhaps the aura may return.

The Morality of Lord Amberley's Platform. THE young hopeful of the professed reformers and radicals has questioned the accuracy of our representation of his views on large families. Will he repudiate the other theories of his party as easily? But his remedies for over population are a part and parcel of their views we may assume, from the following quotation extracted from a journal edited by Mr. Bradlaugh, the expectant representative of the Reform League. Discussing the remedies for poverty, a lady correspondent (save the mark) writes:

"Another party suggests a remedy, namely celibacy. What ignorance! Man, know thyself, has been wisely urged. What does celibacy mean? It means this, prostitution or insanity. The man who advocates celibacy knows nothing of himself and his physical organization.

[blocks in formation]

Man might then

himself, and justice to his fellow men. if he choose live out a noble life, and if we beheld vice in our streets we should not have to sigh and exclaim while we deplore it This evil is a necessary one.”

If Lord Amberley is incompetent to understand the vile suggestions hidden under the phrases of the morceau, we would explain that the writer means that continence is a physical impossibility, and the "noble life" alluded to is neither more nor less than unbridled licentiousness under a "reformed" system.

Vaccino-maniacs.

THE myrmidons of a tyrannical monarchy have no respect of persons, and its minions in the blue coats and the felt helmets appear to be lost to all just appreciation of the enquiring mind, it would appear that the patrons of small-pox are groaning under the oppression of the Vaccination Act, and the divine right of stupidity is not reverenced in the persons of the Vaccino-maniacs. Public Opinion records that one of its most trenchant antivaccination correspondents, whose nom de plume is "Search," has been actually fined ten shillings for aiding and abetting the spread of small-pox, in refusing to allow his child to be vaccinated.

"Search and ye shall (be) fined" (may we be excused the misquotation) proves true once more, and the great privilege of pigheadedness for the British subject is unfringed.

But no! The Vaccino-maniacs are not forgetful of their rights as men we are in a position to assert that they will try the great question of the Female Franchise by returning Mrs. Borrodaile as the representative of their intelligence in the next Parliament.

Public Health.

WE make our usual quotation from the Registrar General's return of births and deaths in the week that ended on Saturday, the 19th of the present month. In London and 13 other large towns of the United Kingdom, there were 4,332 births, and 2,981 deaths; the annual rate of mortality being 24 persons living, distributed as follows: 20 per 1,000 in London, 29 in Edinburgh, and 22 in Dublin, 19 in Bristol, 23 in Birmingham, 30 in Liverpool, 36 in Manchester, 30 in Salford, 26 in Sheffield, 24 in Bradford, 31 in Leeds, 30 in Hull, 29 in Newcas tle-upon-Tyne, and 22 in Glasgow.

In London 1,220 deaths were registered during the week. The average number of deaths for the corresponding week of the year is 1,252, consequently, the deaths in the present return are less by 32 than the estimated amount. The deaths from zymotic diseases were 348, the corrected average number being 392. Four deaths from small-pox, 22 from measles, 74 from scarlatina, 15 from diphtheria, 32 from whooping-cough, 56 from fever, and 86 from diarrhoea were registered. The deaths of eight children and one adult from syphilis, of three children and four adults from burns or scalds, of five persons from drowning, of three infants from suffocation, of four persons who committed suicide, and of two persons who were killed by horses or carriages in the streets, were regis tered last week.

The daughter of a gentleman died on the 11th September, aged 19 years, of sunstroke (7 days), and the daughter, aged 18 years, of a carpenter on the 12th Sep

tember, of typhoid fever from sun exposure," also an infant 10 months old, the son of a builder, died on the 15th September of choleraic diarrhoea (5 days).

Is Smoking Injurious?

the Varty water. We have a sample taken from the river Varty above the reservoir, perfectly pure, clear, and sapid, and another taken from the reservoir itself, straw-coloured, evidently impure, and no doubt dangerous. We believe the people of Dublin are drinking the solution of the dirty mud and bog which forms the bottom of the reservoir, and which was, before the water was let in, closely covered with mud cabins, each with its inevitable cesspool. If our impression be correct, the citizens of Dublin need expect no relief until they have disposed of the ob jectionable solution, and until the reservoir becomes thoroughly washed out by repeated rains.

WE notice another attempt to revive the anti-tobacco crusade. One would have thought that by this time all that could be urged for and against the habit of smoking had been said more than once. Not at all. There are always persons ready to inveigh against tobacco, in spite of the thousands who show their contempt for the arguments used by steadily persisting in their enjoyment. We have no wish to enter the lists. It is more amusing to watch the combat. Yet, as we have recorded the opinions of some accurate observers during the past year, it may be worth while to object to a statement that has been “going the round" of the papers during the last week, but is destitute of the scientific accuracy to which it pretends. In the paragraph alluded to, entitled "Tobacco an Enemy to Public Health," it is calculated that 11lbs. of tobacco per annum is a moderate quantity for community? 2. What ought to be the functions and authe habitual smoker. It is then added that "the nico- thority of Medical Officers of Health? 3. What is the tine inhaled would, if concentrated, have killed a hun-relation of the Water Supply in large towns to the Health

dred times over." Now this statement need not alarm any one. It is a mere presumption of the writer that the nicotine is ever inhaled at all. The nicotine contained

in a small quantity of tobacco would no doubt, if inhaled, destroy life; but then it never is inhaled. The major part is really burnt, that is to say, decomposed into other substances by the heat, and is no longer nicotine. The

residue is not inhaled.

The same paragraph contains another equally unfounded remark. It speaks of the " many thousands who smoke their ounce a-day, or a dozen of cigars or more a-day, and thus pass through their lungs the carbonized vapour of some twenty odd pounds of the weed annually." Now this is mere nonsense. They do not pass the "carbonized vapour "if that may be taken as the pseudo-scientific term for smoke-through their lungs at all. The smoker draws the smoke into his mouth, and then puffs it out, as any one with the least observation may see every day. We should have thought that the fact of a smoker coughing violently should he accidentally get a little smoke into his windpipe, would have preserved the most careless from the blunder of thinking that devotees of the weed breathed smoke. We are not defending the use of tobacco, any more than joining in the counterblast against it. We merely intervene to prevent such baseless statements being supposed to rest on a scientific foundation.

The New Water Supply of Dublin. THE new and expensive provision of water for the City of Dublin from the river Varty has lately been very unsatisfactory, and universal complaint has been made of the water, which is of a dirty yellow colour, and repulsive in appearance. Mr. Parke Neville has attempted to explain this condition by saying that the deposit from the hard water recently used has been detached from the inside of the pipes by the solvent action of the soft water; that this has occurred everywhere under similar circumstances; and that the evil will be remedied by time. We believe this explanation, though perhaps good in theory, is not the cause of the unpleasant turbidity in the case of

The Health Section of the Social Science Association. THE following questions are those proposed for discussion at the approaching meeting of the Association which will open at Birmingham on this day. In this section the following questions will be specially discussed. 1. Can the public Hospitals and Dispensaries of this country be

so administered as to conduce more to the welfare of the

of the Inhabitants?

THE INDIAN PHARMACOPŒIA.

Ir is twenty-four years since the last Bengal Pharmacopoeia appeared. The publication, therefore, of an Indian, based on the last edition of the British, Pharmacopoeia is of considerable importance. We have looked through the book with great interest, and hope shortly to give further information about it. At present we desire to express the gratitude which the profession, and most especially that part of it engaged in India, owes for the book. The editor, Dr. E. J. Waring, deserves a separate "vote of thanks" for the toil he has spent upon it, and but for which it would not have been of half the permanent value it may now prove. It is at once a text book of materia medica, and a complete pharmacopoeia for Indian practitioners.

PARISH DOCTORS AND THE FRANCHISE.

It is said, and we hope truly, that some of the working men who formerly obtained orders for the parish doctor have determined to be in future private patients, in order that being struck off the parish list they may exercise the franchise they have so recently obtained. If the franchise educate men into independence of this abominable system of getting relief in sickness, at the expense of others, it will indeed prove a boon to all. Let men honestly try to avoid this degradation, and they will find their old friend the doctor will not oppress them by long bills. In most cases he would be able to arrange for them to be attended on very easy terms.

DR. HUMPHRY SANDWITH.

Marylebone. A contemporary, which ignores politics, and THIS gentleman is pursuing an active canvass for thinks medicine above party, but has not systematically supported all medical candidates, wishes him success. We wish him well equally, but we have not observed that at present he has made any profession as to medical politics, without which we recognise no exclusive claim on medical men. We shall vote for him, and hope he will serve his profession.

SCIENTIFIC POPULAR LECTURES.-EXAMINA-
TION AND PRIZE SCHEME.

IN anticipation of the third season for the delivery of a course of familiar scientific lectures, prepared by Thomas

Twining, Esq., in connection with the Economic Museum at Twickenham, that gentleman has propounded a plan for examination, and offered prizes to be competed for by the attendants at his lectures. The course will embrace the subjects of Physics, Chemical Physics, Chemistry, Natural History, Human Anatomy, and Human Physiology. Arrangements are at present made for the course at the Lambeth Baths, and although Mr. Twining will be happy to receive proposals for the gratuitous delivery of the lectures in other localities, the examination and prize scheme is, for the present, limited to the Lambeth Baths, where the most numerous and attentive audiences have been present in past seasons. One of the examiners will be Mr. William Hudson, chemical superintendent of the Twickenham Museum, another will be the Rev. G. M. Murphy, and a third is to be named by the Society of Arts. Mr. Twining has desired special precautions to be taken to exclude all except bona fide working class competitors. It is sincerely to be hoped that this practical attempt at popular technical and scientific instruction will meet with the success so well-meant an endeavour de

serves. It is to be followed, according to present arrangements, by a South London Industrial Exhibition in the Lambeth Baths, opening early in March next.

THE PURGATORY OF LONDON HOSPITALS. As might be anticipated, the assertions contained in the article printed by Public Health, and criticised in our last issue, have given rise to no little excitement. They were of such a nature that we felt constrained to give them a wider publicity than they could attain in a monthly journal so recently started. We are gratified that the profession generally should admit the justice of our remarks. We feel it superfluous to say more than we did, knowing full well the character of our hospitals and their physicians and surgeons. It is equally unnecessary to publish letters from persons officially connected with any of these incomparable institutions. The accusation has been made by a quondam patient. We therefore prefer this week to print the reply of such a person. Our correspondent, perhaps carried away by natural indignation, appears to have confused our journal with the one in which the impeachment appeared. We must beg him therefore to look again at THE MEDICAL PRESS AND CIRCULAR for last week, when he will find that the word purgatory and other phrases, which equally amazed him and ourselves, are quotations from the article in the Public Health. The conductors of that magazine-not we, are called upon to explain or justify the allegations

made.

Here is the letter of our ex-Patient :

TO THE EDITOR OF THE MEDICAL PRESS AND CIRCULAR,

SIR,-Looking through your valuable paper of the 23rd inst., I was surprised to see an article headed "The Purgatory of London Hospitals." I therefore think it a debt of gratitude to one of those establishments, viz., "the Westminster," to contradict the above title to Life in the Hospital, experienced by myself for six weeks in this year. The part I particularly allude to is this, "Those occupying a higher social sphere, who are reduced to avail themselves of hospitals, find it very distressing to their self-esteem.”

Now, I have a slight idea that the writer of that sentence must be either a very disagreeable, discontented, or selfish individual, never trying to make himself comfortable under and circumstances, or thinking that perhaps he should have had all attention paid to him, and that other patients of the inferior order to himself should be neglected.

Abcut being obliged to crawl to a bath, I can only say that patients who were unable, or who asked for a bath to be brought to their ward, were never refused, and more than that, the porter used to come up for orders.

Referring to the "female Cerberus" who ruled the room, I can speak as to the willingness and kindness of the Sister and nurses towards all the patients both night and day without looking for bribes, and as to imposing tasks, that is simply absurd, The patients, if convalescent or not confined

to their beds, were asked to assist in the various duties of the Sister or nurses, such as washing up the tea-things, laying the cloth, looking after the kettle, carrying up bread, the milk, and such like, which I myself never for one moment considered hard work, but rather felt pleasure in help. ing those who have plenty to do and who never grumbled to perform any duties they were called upon, and, in addition, pleasing to any well-disposed person, and, furthermore, out I thought that "helping fellow-creatures" must be always of gratitude to the promoters and subscribers of such charitable institutions, I might surely give a helping hand.

If the writer of that word purgatory considers those tasks as such, I fancy that he hardly understands the word, and sincerely hope he may never experience the "real place of abode."

As regards the Matron's visits "being few and far between," I witnessed, during the six weeks I was taken care of, the Matron-a most estimable and kind person-go the rounds of the different wards every day, and frequently during the day, and that lady was always ready, should either of the Sisters or nurses require anything, and instead of "bringing a cold, disdainful glance along both sides of the wards," was always anxious to hear how the patients were going on, and studying their comforts.

From the tone of the purgatory author, I am not surprised at the Chaplain being condemned. I am glad to say that our Chaplain was not one he described, which, I must confess, I hardly credit, I fear his own thoughts and eyes were wandering. We had service in the chapel twice on Sunday and during the week, and those patients who were not able to attend were visited by the Chaplain, who read to them. Lastly, but of course of first consequence, the physicians, surgeons, and others connected with the establishment, deserve the highest praise for their great care and perseverance in all cases. The House-Surgeon, who has, of course, an immense amount of work, was ever ready to come up to any patient, at all hours of the night. And when, sometimes, I have heard grumbling and dissatisfaction, I could not help speaking my mind to those who are ever ready to condemn, but seldom grateful to confess their cures.

With regard to the nurses receiving bribes, there is a notice in every ward forbidding money to be given by a patient or received by a nurse, and, from my experience, the nurses never behaved in the slightest respect different to the poorest or those of a "higher social sphere.'

As a proof of what I have here written with regard to the feeling of patients towards the much-abused functionaries, I can only add that during my stay I saw very many old patients call to see their old nurses. I have done so myself, and would certainly never think I was losing my selfesteem by paying a visit to your correspondent's so-called Purgatory.

The only thing I regretted was that I was obliged to fill up a bed which many a poor creature would have found a

"Paradise."

Not being an author nor medical man, but the relative of a subscriber to your journal, and wishing to give you my experience, to refute the ill-natured remarks about the invaluable institutions, I trust you will excuse me taking so much space.-I am, &c.,

R. I.

P.S.-One of the Governors or Members of Committee was constantly through the wards enquiring if there were any complaints to be made by the patients, and visit the kitchen to see that the rations were good.

Board and there make a complaint of any ill-treatment or irWhen a patient was discharged, he had to go before the regularity, and he was especially asked about the nurses or other members of the establishment receiving or borrowing money.

THE VALUE OF A DIPLOMA. WITH the exception of the degree of M.D. of London University, which is sought for only by those who aspire to a place amongst the elite of the profession, or who can bring the necessary amount of ability, time, and money for this attainment of this qualification, we would seem to attach too much importance to the licenses of our different Colleges, whether it be the Membership of London, or the Licentiateship of Edinburgh or Dublin. In reality, the diplomas themselves will depend for their value on the ability and character

of their possessor, as well as on the subsequent zeal or indifference in the profession.

With some, the obtaining of their diploma is the ending of their studies. They have obtained their El Dorado from one of the Colleges which pride themselves on their licence being of the highest order."

With others, it is but the commencement: they look upon the profession in a more extended view, and consider their few brief years of medical study as only a pupillage, and their diploma as a blue valetis to encourage them to further exertions.

The latter is the more noble view. By further observation and study such men fit themselves for their calling, and are likely to be of benefit to mankind.

"Vita Brevis-Ars Longa," say the philosophers. Of all professions, that of medicine comes under this category. Yet if a license is to stamp a man for life, how brief the period in which it has been acquired, how easy has been the acquirement.

What are three or four years spent in the acquisition of knowledge, whether of the general literature of our own country, or of the language of Greece, of Rome. How much longer must they who seek some of the honorary preferments of our Universities devote themselves to study? Yet the recipients are comparatively not benefited in the race of life, for but to a few are these honours of utility, There are long years spent at Harrow, or Eton, or one of the other public schools, under masters of ability; and these are but the preparatory schools, where the mind, if it is not stored with the rich lore of classical or general information, is yet prepared for its reception, and undergoes a process of formation which is subsequently turned to account. Then several years are passed at a University, and ever after those years, the knowledge acquired is felt by those who appreciate what knowledge is, to be comparatively | trivial. It was a saying of the ancients, "The more we know the less we know;" but this, in modern days, is, unfortunately, often reversed, so that 'tis said, "The less we know the more (we think) we know."

Seeing that so many years are spent in acquiring a knowledge of languages and literature which are only required to give a man a status in society and to enable him to mingle with

his compeers, of what account are three or four years spent in the acquisition of the knowledge of a profession which embraces such a wide field, and into which so many collateral branches of science enter, for each of which the whole period would be required? Of what worth is the first year? The embryonic surgeon has the vast ocean of medical and surgical knowledge spread out before him. He is like the youth who makes his first voyage. He is dazzled by the extent of surface which he has to survey. As yet he knows not the land-marks or the soundings, nor can he read the stars or foretell a gale. As the voyage goes on he gets faint glimmerings of nautical knowledge, and all is not the chaos he once thought. Thus with the student: he is perplexed and bewildered-long-sounding names and opposite theories confound him; but as the year grows on he begins to see his way, and finds that the mysteries of diseases can be read. He has acquired some little knowledge, learnt a part of the grammer, and got by heart some of the names. In his second year he makes improvement, and reads some of the authors, the text books. The third year comes on: he is well" made up ;" he receives his diploma; he is stamped on an "ornatus vei," then farewell to books. During those years what has he read? A text book on Anatomy, with some directions; text books on Medicine, Surgery, Physiology, and the various other subjects-in all about nine text books.

The diplomas of our best Colleges can be thus obtained. Nor can we object to this. Yet, knowing that such is the nature of medical education, it does seem absurd to attach any intrinsic value to such qualifications. Nay, worse: it was the boast of "a grinder," now deceased, that he would take a carman of "ordinary" ability off the street and put him through our Colleges in six months. This sad truth was forced upon him by the class of men whom he had prepared, and by their success in obtaining their qualifications. Much has been said of late years about improving our College examinations. This is beginning at the wrong end. We must teach our students what is the meaning of the term, " reading." We must introduce some of the University element into their studies. We must make them un

derstand that a "reading man " is one who is not content with merely getting through a certain set of books, -as few as possible-but one who studies for the benefit and the gratification which learning affords.

Many may laugh at these ideas, may view them as "transcendental; yet this is owing to the education they have received. With pity more than anger we may look upon such. They cannot understand what it is to read Eschylus, Euripides, or Sophocles, for pleasure, whose works they consider dull, stale, and useless.

We may make our examinations more difficult, and may thus exclude many who should never have diplomas; but the wiser and better plan would seem to be to diffuse different ideas about medical studies, to change the typical medical student, to break through the prejudices and associations connected with the caste; then it would follow, as of necessity, that the rank of the profession would be improved, and the value of a diploma would be proportionately increased. G. H.

name.

REPORT ON WINE.

THE wines generally known and commercially dealt with under the name of "Sherry" comprehend all white wines imported direct from Cadiz, but the true sherry is the produce of that triangular portion of Spain included between Puerto Santa Maria, San Lucar, and Tribujena, including the wealthy town of Xeres, from which sherry acquires its The choicest wine is the produce of the vineyards between the two latter places, that is, north of Xeres. But the exports from Cadiz are drawn from all parts of the vast vineyard of Spain, and embrace many varieties which have a reputation almost equal to that of the exceptional Xeres. It would be well if these supplies were derived exclusively from such sources, but there is too much reason to believe that of late in particular, they are sometimes referable to a much more questionable origin; but the wines of Montilla, La Mancha, Valencia, Malaga, &c., are fully entitled to rank with the produce of any other part of the Peninsula.

It would be beside the object of these reports to enter into any consideration of wines in general, or sherry in particular, as a commercial commodity; we are only concerned with the nature and characteristics of the genuine article in its various aspects from a sanitary point of view, and the sophistications or adulterations which may interfere with or neutralise its hygienic properties, and we feel confident that what follows will sufficiently demonstrate the importance of the inquiry.

Wine, particularly port, and still more especially sherry, is frequently prescribed as a tonic or restorative. We have already shown how little claim port wine commonly has to such a distinction, and trust to prove that in some respects at least sherry is quite as objectionable,

unless with

proper

discrimination.

When a physician prescribes, he does so knowing to a tittle the proportions of the medicaments recognised by the Pharmacopoeia; but in the article of wine it is to be feared that his knowledge is exceedingly vague, and derived more from popular impression than from scientific research. In proof of this, in a lately published medical work upon the effects of alcohol on digestion, sherry, as something definite and beyond question, is put upon the same low alcoholic footing as beer, which never exceeds 14° of alcoholic strength. The subjoined results of our examination will show how "wide as the poles asunder" these two may be, and how fallacious, consequently, the conclusions drawn from such premises must be.

The type of a perfect sherry is a bright amber colour, inclining more to yellow than green, clean on the palate, dry, full of body, and characteristically fragrant. When fully fermented and matured, it possesses these qualities in perfection. The natural alcoholic strength is from 25.5 to 300 per cent. of proof spirit (the latter equivalent to about 17 per cent. of alcohol). As the wine ages it acquires a somewhat deeper colour, and a slight accession of strength, rarely, however, exceeding 32 per cent, of

« PreviousContinue »