...л, 4. If an attorney MIC as a common person the Court of CP will give the de^ fendant leave to plead that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court of Requests together with other matters. Tncy v. flfadan. 1 B. & P. бср 5. So in such case if a...

...plaintiff below justified under process of an inferior court, it was necessary to set forth in his plea that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the court, otherwise the plaintiff might demur thereto. CHAMBRE, CHAMBRE, J. In Truscott v. Carpenter, the plea...

...they warranted the plaintiff's proposition, that it was not necessary in such an action as the present to state that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the interior court. That the case cited from Salk. 201. would not alone have induced the Court to come...

...for cause of demurrer. 2d. The want of setting forth a summons. Sd. It is not sufficiently alleged, that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the court. 4th. A battery is alleged, but not sufficiently justified in law. As to the first : wherever a party...

...Blac. Rep. 373. Cowp. 367. Barnes, 48. court of Common Pleas will give the defendant leave to plead that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court of Requests, together with other matters (/). So in such case, if a sum under 40 s. be recovered, and...

...mentioned Doug. 538. If an attorney sue as a common person, CP will give the defendant leave to plead that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the court of requests, together with other matters. Tegg t>. Madan, 1 B. Sf P. 629. 144 be entered under the...

...whrre a party Justinos under process of an inferior Court, it is necessary to set forth in hi» plea, that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court. Evant v. Munklcy, 4 Taunt. 48. Vid. Com. Dig. Courts, P. 6. Viu. Ah. Courts, La •• • 2. It appears...

...ib. ib. 5. If an attorney sue as a common person, the Court will give the Defendant leave to plead that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court of Requests, together with other matters. Tayg v. Madan, H. 37 Geo. 3. 629 CUSTOM, See EVIDENCE, No....

...Bull v. Steward (b), in an action against the bailiffs of a borough for an escape, it did not appear that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court; but it was held, that, after verdict, the Court would presume every thing proved at the trial which...

...judgment on the sufficiency of the declaration, saying, " that it is not necessary in such an action to state that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the inferior court." Vaughan B. Lucking v. Denning (a) one of the cases relied on by Lord Kenyan, does...