United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 368United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1962 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
Page 24
... supra ; Kissinger v . United States , 176 F. Supp . 828 ( 1959 ) .3 This limitation is analogous to that applied in libels under the Jones Act , where it has long been held that recovery is precluded if the ship involved is not a vessel ...
... supra ; Kissinger v . United States , 176 F. Supp . 828 ( 1959 ) .3 This limitation is analogous to that applied in libels under the Jones Act , where it has long been held that recovery is precluded if the ship involved is not a vessel ...
Page 29
... supra , 239 ) and does not with- out more give either State the right to deprive him of his livelihood in light of the requirements of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Per Curiam . 368 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ...
... supra , 239 ) and does not with- out more give either State the right to deprive him of his livelihood in light of the requirements of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Per Curiam . 368 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ...
Page 40
... supra , or the reasons upon which that decision rests . " 198 In support of this conclusion , the Court in Borum pointed to a number of factual differences with the Rock case . The first mentioned , and apparently the most important of ...
... supra , or the reasons upon which that decision rests . " 198 In support of this conclusion , the Court in Borum pointed to a number of factual differences with the Rock case . The first mentioned , and apparently the most important of ...
Page 44
... supra , especially with Blanton v . Northern Pacific R. Co .; Casso v . Pennsylvania R. Co .; Eresafe v . New York , New Haven & Hartford R. Co .; and White v . Thompson . 12 For contemporaneous comment on the Rock decision , see ...
... supra , especially with Blanton v . Northern Pacific R. Co .; Casso v . Pennsylvania R. Co .; Eresafe v . New York , New Haven & Hartford R. Co .; and White v . Thompson . 12 For contemporaneous comment on the Rock decision , see ...
Page 47
... supra . MR . JUSTICE WHITTAKER , dissenting . Claiming to have suffered injuries to his back by the negligence of fellow servants in the course of his employ- ment by the respondent railroad in interstate commerce , petitioner brought ...
... supra . MR . JUSTICE WHITTAKER , dissenting . Claiming to have suffered injuries to his back by the negligence of fellow servants in the course of his employ- ment by the respondent railroad in interstate commerce , petitioner brought ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affiliation Alabama alleged amicus curiae appeal is dismissed appellee application argued the cause Assistant Attorney Assn Attorney General Miller Beatrice Rosenberg C. A. 2d Cir C. A. 5th Cir Certiorari denied Certiorari granted claim Commission Commissioner common carriers Communist Party Cong Congress contract carrier convictions Corp County Court of Appeals Court of California CURIAM deposition dissenting District Court District of Columbia employee eral evidence Florida Fourteenth Amendment HARLAN Illinois issue judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE DOUGLAS Labor Board leave to file Lehman Brothers Louisiana membership Miller and Beatrice Misc motor October 9 Pennsylvania peti petition for writ petitioner petitioner's question record Reported respondent Rule sentence shipper Solicitor General Cox Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court Texas tion tioner tobacco transportation trial U. S. App U.S. October United States Court Virginia WARDEN WCAN William WOKY writ of certiorari York
Popular passages
Page 235 - of the Commission, and no report by the Commission of any investigation of any such accident, shall be admitted as evidence, or used for any other purpose, in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in such report or investigation." 49 USC §320(f). 10 E. g., United States
Page 390 - 11 The penalties under the 1959 amendments are as follows: "Any person who violates any order issued by the commission or board under subsection (b) of this section after such order has become final, and while such order is in effect, shall forfeit and pay to the United States a civil penalty of not more than
Page 363 - (D) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor or its shareholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred, or (E) a recapitalization, or (F) a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization, however effected.
Page 42 - at all in the history, purpose or language of the Act which provides recovery for any "injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of" the railroad 14 and there is no prior authority of this Court which requires or even permits us to disregard or impair
Page 449 - or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
Page 363 - in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock, of at least 80 per centum of the . . . stock of another corporation." " (Emphasis added.) This type of reorganization is commonly called a "(B) reorganization." There is no dispute between the parties about the fact that the transaction involved was not a "reorganization,
Page 342 - record. The Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which findings with respect to questions of fact if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole shall be conclusive, and shall file its
Page 390 - for each violation .... Each separate violation of any such order shall be a separate offense, except that in the case of a violation through continuing failure or neglect to obey a final order of the commission or board each day of continuance of such failure or neglect shall be deemed a separate offense.
Page 235 - That neither said report nor any report of said investigation nor any part thereof shall be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report or investigation.