United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 368United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1962 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 79
Page lxxix
... eral Trade Comm'n , 110 U. S. App . D. C. 1 Smolowe v . Delendo Corp. , 136 F. 2d 231 412 Snowden v . Hughes , 321 U. S. 1 456 127 44 201 205 Southern Pacific Term . Co. v . Interstate Commerce Comm'n , 219 U. S. 498 Sperry Rand Corp. v ...
... eral Trade Comm'n , 110 U. S. App . D. C. 1 Smolowe v . Delendo Corp. , 136 F. 2d 231 412 Snowden v . Hughes , 321 U. S. 1 456 127 44 201 205 Southern Pacific Term . Co. v . Interstate Commerce Comm'n , 219 U. S. 498 Sperry Rand Corp. v ...
Page lxxx
... eral Trade Comm'n , 291 F.2d 833 141 , 428 369 U. S. 736 Swift & Co. v . Packinghouse Workers , 177 F. Supp . 511 Co. , 314 U. S. 118 Town . See name of town . Townsend v . Burke , 334 Townsend v . Yeomans , 301 U. S. 441 418 447 514 ...
... eral Trade Comm'n , 291 F.2d 833 141 , 428 369 U. S. 736 Swift & Co. v . Packinghouse Workers , 177 F. Supp . 511 Co. , 314 U. S. 118 Town . See name of town . Townsend v . Burke , 334 Townsend v . Yeomans , 301 U. S. 441 418 447 514 ...
Page 13
... eral that , under the principles announced in Bell v . United States , 349 U. S. 81 , the petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U. S. C. § 2314. In light of such representations and upon consideration of the entire ...
... eral that , under the principles announced in Bell v . United States , 349 U. S. 81 , the petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U. S. C. § 2314. In light of such representations and upon consideration of the entire ...
Page 25
... eral question . Upon plenary consideration , we are satisfied that , both on their face and as applied to appellant , Kan . Gen. Stat . , 1949 , § 7-104 , and amended Kan . Sup . Ct . Rules 41 and 54 promulgated by the Supreme Court of ...
... eral question . Upon plenary consideration , we are satisfied that , both on their face and as applied to appellant , Kan . Gen. Stat . , 1949 , § 7-104 , and amended Kan . Sup . Ct . Rules 41 and 54 promulgated by the Supreme Court of ...
Page 49
... eral Employers ' Liability Act to one who has honestly acquired the status of and is truly an employee of a rail- road . I think Congress did not intend to give those special benefits to a person who has acquired a putative employment ...
... eral Employers ' Liability Act to one who has honestly acquired the status of and is truly an employee of a rail- road . I think Congress did not intend to give those special benefits to a person who has acquired a putative employment ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affiliation Alabama alleged amicus curiae appeal is dismissed appellee application argued the cause Assistant Attorney Assn Attorney General Miller Beatrice Rosenberg C. A. 2d Cir C. A. 5th Cir Certiorari denied Certiorari granted claim Commission Commissioner common carriers Communist Party Cong Congress contract carrier convictions Corp County Court of Appeals Court of California CURIAM deposition dissenting District Court District of Columbia employee eral evidence Florida Fourteenth Amendment HARLAN Illinois issue judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE DOUGLAS Labor Board leave to file Lehman Brothers Louisiana membership Miller and Beatrice Misc motor October 9 Pennsylvania peti petition for writ petitioner petitioner's question record Reported respondent Rule sentence shipper Solicitor General Cox Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court Texas tion tioner tobacco transportation trial U. S. App U.S. October United States Court Virginia WARDEN WCAN William WOKY writ of certiorari York
Popular passages
Page 235 - of the Commission, and no report by the Commission of any investigation of any such accident, shall be admitted as evidence, or used for any other purpose, in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in such report or investigation." 49 USC §320(f). 10 E. g., United States
Page 390 - 11 The penalties under the 1959 amendments are as follows: "Any person who violates any order issued by the commission or board under subsection (b) of this section after such order has become final, and while such order is in effect, shall forfeit and pay to the United States a civil penalty of not more than
Page 363 - (D) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor or its shareholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred, or (E) a recapitalization, or (F) a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization, however effected.
Page 42 - at all in the history, purpose or language of the Act which provides recovery for any "injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of" the railroad 14 and there is no prior authority of this Court which requires or even permits us to disregard or impair
Page 449 - or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
Page 363 - in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock, of at least 80 per centum of the . . . stock of another corporation." " (Emphasis added.) This type of reorganization is commonly called a "(B) reorganization." There is no dispute between the parties about the fact that the transaction involved was not a "reorganization,
Page 342 - record. The Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which findings with respect to questions of fact if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole shall be conclusive, and shall file its
Page 390 - for each violation .... Each separate violation of any such order shall be a separate offense, except that in the case of a violation through continuing failure or neglect to obey a final order of the commission or board each day of continuance of such failure or neglect shall be deemed a separate offense.
Page 235 - That neither said report nor any report of said investigation nor any part thereof shall be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report or investigation.