 ... it should be fully understood that the •defendant could not legally carry on any part of his business in the public street to the annoyance of the public; that the primary object of the street was for the free passage of the public, and anything...  The New South Wales Law Reports, 1880-1900 - Page 104by New South Wales. Supreme Court - 1883Full view - About this book
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir Edward Hyde East - Law reports, digests, etc - 1809 - 540 pages
...pre... ,. i vent a repetition or the nuisance. The Court then said, Tluit it should be fully understood that the defendant could not legally carry on any...street was for the free passage of the public, and nny thing which impeded that free passage, without necessity, was a nuisance. That if (he nature of... | |
 | Robert Wellbeloved - Bridges - 1829 - 1026 pages
...street, although there was room for two carriages to pass on the opposite side of the street. Per Cur : The primary object of the street was for the free passage of the public, and any thing which impeded that free passage, without necessity, was a nuisance. And in the case of Rex... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1830 - 618 pages
...indictment for a nuisance in a public struct and highway, by obstructing the same, the court said, that the primary object of the street was for the free passage of the public, and any thing which impeded that free passage, without necessity, was a nuisance. The provision in the... | |
 | Ireland. Court of King's Bench - Law reports, digests, etc - 1845 - 652 pages
...on the street, and having it standing there so that the public were inconvenienced. The Court say, " The primary object of the street was for the free "passage of the public, and any thing which impeded that free passage, " without necessity, was a nuisance." But it was thirdly... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1852 - 560 pages
...a verdict of guilty against the defendant The People v. Carpenter. was sustained. The court say, " that the primary object of the street was for the free passage of the public: and any thing that impeded that free passage without necessity, was a nuisance." The free passage of the... | |
 | Benjamin Vaughan Abbott, Austin Abbott - Law reports, digests, etc - 1864 - 808 pages
...Hi£hways;-Law of the Road. that the car would be driven moderately and prudently. Ib. 13. Business. One cannot legally carry on any part of his business in the public street, to the annoyance of the public. The primary object of a street is to afford a free passage to the public, and any thing which impedes... | |
 | Joel Prentiss Bishop - Criminal law - 1865 - 806 pages
...there was room for carriages to pass two abreast. " The court said, that it should be fully understood that the defendant could not legally carry on any...object of the street was for the free passage of the publie, and anything which impeded that free passage, without necessity, was a nuisance. That if the... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Forms (Law) - 1868 - 528 pages
...carriages to pass on the opposite side of the street. The court said that it should be fully understood that the defendant could not legally carry on any...free passage of the public and anything which impeded that free p;issage, without necessity, was a nuisance; that if the nature of the defendant's business... | |
 | Joel Prentiss Bishop - Criminal law - 1868 - 832 pages
...there was room for carriages to pass two abreast. " The court said, that it should be fully understood that the defendant could not legally carry on any...street was for the free passage of the public, and any thing which impeded that free passage, without necessity, was a nuisance. That if the nature of... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Thomas Durfee - Highway law - 1868 - 628 pages
...the public passage not being impeded, though narrowed thereby. But the language of the Court was : " That the primary object of the street was for the...passage of the public, and anything which impeded that free passage, 1c'dhout necessity, was a nuisance. That if the nature of the defendant's business... | |
| |
