Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Common Pleas and in the Exchequer Chamber: From 1856 ... [to 1865], Volume 1T. & J.W. Johnson & Company, 1857 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 21
... question . The said James William Clark pays no money rent for the said house ; his occupation being considered as part payment for his services . It is necessary for the due discharge of his duties as hall - keeper that he should ...
... question . The said James William Clark pays no money rent for the said house ; his occupation being considered as part payment for his services . It is necessary for the due discharge of his duties as hall - keeper that he should ...
Page 21
... question ; and , as there is nothing in the facts stated to show that the claimant was required to occupy the house for the performance of his services , or did occupy it in order to their performance , or that it was conducive to that ...
... question ; and , as there is nothing in the facts stated to show that the claimant was required to occupy the house for the performance of his services , or did occupy it in order to their performance , or that it was conducive to that ...
Page 23
... question is to be gathered from the judgments of this court in the two cases referred to . The real question is this , ―Is the party required to occupy the house as subservient to his appointment ? If so , he does not occupy * as tenant ...
... question is to be gathered from the judgments of this court in the two cases referred to . The real question is this , ―Is the party required to occupy the house as subservient to his appointment ? If so , he does not occupy * as tenant ...
Page 25
... question to be whether the claimant occupied the premises as tenant or as servant . It may be that the party occupies as tenant , and that he is required to occupy ; but it may also be that he occupies as servant , and that he is ...
... question to be whether the claimant occupied the premises as tenant or as servant . It may be that the party occupies as tenant , and that he is required to occupy ; but it may also be that he occupies as servant , and that he is ...
Page 27
... question , which was built for the residence of the hall - keeper . " And it appears to be a place where convenience requires that he should reside , in order that he might have by the internal communication with the Guildhall premises ...
... question , which was built for the residence of the hall - keeper . " And it appears to be a place where convenience requires that he should reside , in order that he might have by the internal communication with the Guildhall premises ...
Common terms and phrases
action affidavit aforesaid agent agreement alleged amount application appointed assignees attorney authority behalf borough carriage carried Caterham charge charter-party claim coal and coke coals COCKBURN coke collieries complainant contract costs counsel court court of equity creditor CRESSWELL CROWDER damages debt declaration deed defendant defendant's delivered deponent discharged E. C. L. R. vol Eastern Counties Railway Eastern Railway Company Edward Rawson entitled evidence Exch execution ground held issue John Thackeray judge judgment jury Kingston station land Lingham London Lord Messrs Midland Midland railway North Eastern Railway notice objection opinion owners Oxlade paid party payment person plaintiff plea premises proceedings purpose question Ralph Ellis reason received recover referred refused rent respect revising barrister river Yeo Royal British Bank rule shareholder show cause Sir F society statute tenant thereof Thesiger tion traffic trial verdict Vict wagons William writ
Popular passages
Page 219 - That no contract for the sale of any goods, wares and merchandise, for the price of ten pounds sterling or upwards shall be allowed to be good, except the buyer shall accept part of the goods so sold, and actually receive the same, or give something in earnest to bind the bargain, or in part payment, or that some note or memorandum in writing of the said bargain be made and signed by the parties to be charged by such contract, or their agents thereunto lawfully authorized.
Page 595 - ... is the language of the law. Though he may use the water while it runs over his land, he cannot unreasonably detain it, or give it another direction, and he must return it to its ordinary channel when it leaves his estate. Without the consent of the adjoining proprietors, he cannot divert or diminish the quantity of water which would otherwise descend to the proprietors below, nor throw the water back upon the proprietors above, without a grant or an uninterrupted enjoyment of twenty years, which...
Page 595 - ... without diminution or alteration. No proprietor has a right to use the water to the prejudice of other proprietors above or below him, unless he has a prior right to divert it, or a title to some exclusive enjoyment.
Page 303 - It has been contended that that is erroneous, and that it should have been left to the jury to say whether there was any such implied contract.
Page 315 - Olyn, for the plaintiff, contended that, under the 87th section of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854 (17 & 18 Viet. c. 125...
Page 447 - ... no such company shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to or in favour of any particular person or company, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 123 - Judge reserved leave to the defendant to move to enter the verdict for him if the Court should be of opinion that...
Page 43 - ... if the qualification consist of a rent-charge, then the names of the owners of the property out of which such rent is issuing, or some of them, and the situation of the property.
Page 561 - ... appear in such copy or extract without proof of the signature thereto or of the seal of office affixed thereto...
Page 303 - And it is further submitted, that it is an invariably true proposition, that, wherever one of the parties to a special contract not under seal has. in an unqualified manner, refused to perform his side of the contract, or has disabled himself from performing it by his own act, the other party has, thereupon, a right to elect to rescind it, and may, on doing so, immediately sue on a quantum meruit for anything which he had done under it previously to the rescission ; this it is apprehended is established...