« PreviousContinue »
hills of superabundant vegetation, as the wind rustled through the corn, seemed the most affecting monuments which nature could devise, and gave a melancholy animation to this plain of death."
What an awful preparation for eternity!in such habiliments, on such a day, in such a frame of mind, reeking with the blood of their fellow creatures, breathing out rage, revenge, and madness, to rush uncalled, into the presence of their Judge, while in the very act of violating all his commands, and defying his vengeance !
Yes, there is “awful guilt" somewhere ; and, reader, you are probably a partaker in that guilt. What brought these armies to this fatal shock,—so fatal to thousands ? A love of military glory. Who has fed and pampered this love of glory? Every one, who endeavors to keep up a military spirit,
—who delights to inflame the minds of youth by military parade ? Every one, who honors warriors merely as such ; who praises military exploits, without regard to end or object; and especially every one, whether parent, guardian, or instructer, who imbues the infant mind with such anti-christian no
tions, or who does not take care to eradicate them as fast as developed, bas incurred this awful guilt ; and though he cannot properly be called accessary to the crimes which are past, he is accessary to those which may come, for “ he who sows the wind shall reap the whirlwind.”
THE DOCTRINES AND PRACTICE OF THE EARLY
CHRISTIANS AS THEY RELATE TO WAR.
It has been my intention, for some time past, to prepare an essay on the above subject; but after having taken some notes, and laid up some matter, I find that I can do . nothing so well, as to give my readers extracts from the “ Tract No. 3, of the Society for the Promotion of Permanent and Universal Peace," written by the celebrated Clark
66 Accustomed, as Christians have been, for many centuries, to consider the profession of arms as singularly honorable, and martial achievements, however bloody, as
the most glorious of human exploits, it must be difficult for them to see the following passages of Scripture, through a clear, pure, and uncorrupted medium ; viz. “I say unto you, resist not evil ; love your enemies ; do good to them that hate, and pray for them that despitefully use and persecute you." The prejudices of some, the interests of others, and custom with all, have induced a general belief, that these, and similar passages, have no relation to wars. But it may be important to all, but more particularly to those who desire to be accounted real followers of Christ, to know in what manner their first Fathers, the early Christians, understood ther; to know how those persons understood them, who were converted by the Apostles themselves, or who had opportunities of interpretation from the very lips of their immediate successors; who believed with all their hearts, that the New Testament was of divine origin; that the precepts it contained were not to be dispensed with to suit particular cases, without the imputation of evil, and who chose rather to die by the hand of the public executioner, than to do that which appeared to them to be wrong.
Now we intend to furnish the reader with such knowledge, and to prove to him, that long after the introduction of the Christian Religion into the world, that is, while the lamp of Christianity burnt pure and bright, not only the Fathers of the Church held it unlawful for Christians to bear arms, but those, who came within the pale of it, abstained from the use of them, and this to the certain loss of their lives, and that it was not till Christianity became corrupted, that its followers became soldiers."
“With respect to the opinions of the first Christian Writers after the Apostles, or of those who are usually called the Fathers of the Church, relative to War, I believe we shall find them alike for nearly three hundred years, if not for a longer period.”
We must now leave out the authorities, which the author has detailed at considerable length, and barely give the names of the fathers and their opinions.
Justin the martyr considered war unlawful, and the devil the author of all war.
Tatian speaks in the same terms, on the same subject.
CLEMENS of Alexandria is also decisive against the lawfulness of war,
TERTULLIAN strongly condemned the practice of bearing arms. Among many quotations is the following: Shall he, who is not to revenge his own wrongs, be instrumental in bringing others into chains, imprisonment, death?
CYPRIAN is quoted to much the same purpose.
LACTANTIUS says, “ It can never be lawful for a righteous man to go to war, whose warfare is in righteousness itself.”
“To these may be added ARCHELAUS, AMBROSE, CHRYSOSTOM, JEROM, and Cyril, all of whom were of opinion that it was unlawful for Christians to go to war.
With respect to the practice of the early Christians, which is the next point to be considered, it may be observed, that there is no well authenticated instance upon record of Christians entering into the army for nearly the two first centuries ; but it is true, on the other hand, that they had declined the military profession, as one in which it was not lawful for them to engage."
This is proved by four kinds of evidence. 1. Historical facts.
2. Expressions of certain authors of those early times, who made a distinction between