Parmelee, George H., in Case and Comment-The Annota- tor's Problem 938 Personal ..58, 114, 200, 310, 405, 510, 618, 705, 863, 919, 1034, 1122 323 Police Power-Hon. J. Andrew Cobb ..... 1098 Pollock, Sir Frederick, in Law Quarterly Review-Judicial Records 815 Post, Louis F.-Taxation of Land Values 247 Possession as a Root of Title-T. F. Martin Privy Council, Judicial Committee-Toronto and York Ra- dial Ry. v. Corporation of the City of Toronto 1113 Proof by Ordeals among the Romans 797 Proposed Navy Contribution-Editorial 56 Pro Bono Publico-Some observations on the Bank Act and 62 R. Radcliffe, Francis R. Y., Legal Development in England Register, Layton B., in University of Pennsylvania Law 492, 1078 Revocation of Shares of Residue 806 Rex v. Grand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co., Judicial Committee- John S. Ewart, K.C. 475 Rex v. Arthur Pelkey. Supreme Court of Alberta 690 Some Early Legislation and Legislators in Upper 22, 96, 180 The First Years of the Quarter Sessions in and for the Root, Speech of Hon. Elihu, on Panama Canal Tolls Judicial Committee of Privy Council-John S. Ewart, 133 Ryan, Peter- Some further Observations on Canadian Banks and 84 Security Is a past debt a valuable consideration for? 349 Shattuck, Herbert C., in Case and Comment- Power of Municipality to prevent Over-crowding of Street Smoke, K.C.-Tribute to the memory of the late Samuel... 623 712 ..... Sterilization of Criminals and Imbeciles, a Protest against 972 Guimond v. Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance Co.... 139 PAGE Supreme Court of Canada-Continued. Pickles v. China Mutual Insurance Co. Canada Foundry v. Bucyrus Cross v. Carstairs In re British Columbia Fisheries Halifax & South Western Ry. Co. v. Schwartz 563 Warren v. Forst... 563 In re sections 4 and 70 of Canadian Insurance Act, 1910 1202 Three Great Charters of English Freedom, by Silas Al- ward, Esq. 144 ... Toronto & York Radial Ry. v. Corporation of the City of The Canadian Law Times. VOL. XXXIII. JANUARY, 1913. No. 1. A DIVORCE COURT IN CANADA. To deal properly with the question, whether we should have a Divorce Court in Canada, or remain under present conditions, requires great consideration, and involves discussion of a very difficult subject. It is perhaps needless to state that what I shall say to you on the matter is entirely my own personal view, and does not in any sense pretend to be the opinion of the Bar Association of Ontario. I have been requested to give an address on the subject from an independent standpoint, and having devoted much thought to the many difficulties in the way of a satisfactory solution of the question, I shall endeavour to place before you in a concise and logical form the reasons which have led me to the conclusions which I propose to present to you. Involving as it does, issues of various kinds-moral, religious, national and individual, the subject will be more intelligently dealt with by eliminating some phases which have their origin in the minds of certain classes, but which do not extend to the general public. The exigencies of modern social life and the conditions of a highly artificial and complex system of human relationship have practically changed in later days the relative positions of men and women. What may have once been cogent arguments in favour of a law preventing divorce under any or all circumstances, may not be at all applicable to our present conditions. We find instances by way of illustration in other branches of the law. Combinations which at one time were altogether contrary to law are now with certain limitations quite lawful. Acts which were at one time harmless, have been made crimes by Statute. Many things which a century ago were looked upon as deeds of evil are now treated as ordinary acts in the lives of respectable citizens, and conversely, the pleasures of the past are in some cases treated VOL. XXXIII. C.L.T.-1 |