The Power of Public IdeasRobert B. Reich |
From inside the book
Page 21
... The Federalist , James Madison described a pluralist political system , one with dispersed and shared power . Alexis de Tocqueville chronicled a pluralist American society , distinguished by widespread participation and a tendency to ...
... The Federalist , James Madison described a pluralist political system , one with dispersed and shared power . Alexis de Tocqueville chronicled a pluralist American society , distinguished by widespread participation and a tendency to ...
Page 125
... the Federalist described the judiciary as the " least dangerous branch " of government , having no direct influence over " the sword or the purse , " 1 generations of scholars and commentators have fretted over where judges should find ...
... the Federalist described the judiciary as the " least dangerous branch " of government , having no direct influence over " the sword or the purse , " 1 generations of scholars and commentators have fretted over where judges should find ...
Page 244
... The Federalist , No. 51 , Jacob E. Cooke , ed . ( Middletown , CT : Wesleyan University Press , 1961 ) and Herbert Sotring , What the Anti - Federalists Were For ( Chicago : University of Chicago Press , 1981 ) , chap . 3 . 17. Alexis ...
... The Federalist , No. 51 , Jacob E. Cooke , ed . ( Middletown , CT : Wesleyan University Press , 1961 ) and Herbert Sotring , What the Anti - Federalists Were For ( Chicago : University of Chicago Press , 1981 ) , chap . 3 . 17. Alexis ...
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
Beyond SelfInterest | 13 |
Chapter 2 Why Public Ideas Matter | 31 |
Copyright | |
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action activities administrative agencies alcohol alternative American analysis argued arguments attitudes authority become behavior beliefs benefits Chapter choices citizens conception concern consider constituents create dangerous deal debate decisions defined demand democracy democratic depends desires determine direct discussion economic effects efforts ends evaluation evidence example expectations experience expressive fact function goals ideas important individual influence institutions interest involved issues leaders leadership learning less liberal major manager maximization means motivation nature norms objective officials organizations participants particular political possible practice preferences Press principles problem procedural produce programs public deliberation public policy questions reason reporting responsibility role rules seems self-interest shared situations social society solutions story suggests theory tion understanding University values vision welfare York