Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

which he proceeded, accompanied by Sir Henry Ellis, in the boats of the wrecked ship to Batavia. He was subsequently appointed Governor-General of India, and landed in Calcutta, 1823. He had no sooner assumed the government than he found himself inIvolved in hostile discussions with the Burmese, which terminated within five months After two camin a declaration of war.

paigns, the first Burmese War ended in the Treaty of Yandaboo. The progress of the Burmese War also gave rise to the Barrackpore Mutiny, which was violently suppressed, and to several seditious manifestations in India. The Governor-General was created Earl Amherst of Aracan in 1826. [BURMESE WAR.]

Ellis, Proceedings of the late Embassy to China, 1817.

Amhurst, Nicholas (d. 1742), was a writer of satires and political papers of considerable ability. He published a caustic series of papers in 1726 under the title, Terræ Filius, intended as a satire on the University of Oxford. After quitting Oxford, Amhurst devoted himself to political journalism, attaching himself to the opponents of Walpole. He conducted The Craftsman, a political journal, to which Bolingbroke and Pulteney contributed largely. Amhurst was, however, neglected by his influential friends, and died in poverty and distress.

Biographia Britannica; Wilson, Hist. of Merchant Taylors' School.

Amiens, MISE OF (January 23, 1264),
was the award pronounced by Louis IX. of
France, to whom the question as to the obli-
gation of Henry III. to observe the Provisions
of Oxford had been referred, on Dec. 16,
1263. Since 1261 the baronial party had
been reduced by desertions, and distracted
by Prince Edward's dereliction of their cause
in 1262, and by disputes and jealousies
This, with the fear of
among themselves.
Louis openly supporting Henry III. with
troops, explains their forced assent to an
arbitration which, from Louis' character and
frequent services to Henry, could only issue
one way. Influenced by his strong views as
to the kingly office, and by the authority
of the papal bull, possibly also by the ne-
gotiations already on foot for the papal
appointment of his brother Charles to the
crown of Naples, Louis, after some days'
hearing of the pleadings on either side, and
perhaps some hesitation, decided completely
for his brother sovereign, annulled the Pro-
visions of Oxford, especially as to the employ-
ment of aliens in England and the royal
appointment of sheriffs; but after all left to
the barons a loophole in declaring that his
decision was not to annul any of the ancient
In March
charters or liberties of the realm.

the warfare broke out which ended for the time
in Simon's victory at Lewes. Similar arbi-
trations were frequent about this period:
even the day before Lewes, the barons offered

Anc

to submit all, save the aliens question, to a
new body of arbitrators; and a striking
political song of the time shows the general
feeling, even in the national party, that some
compromise must be accepted. The award
had the effect of still further reducing and
weakening Simon de Montfort's party.

The documents connected with this event are
given in Père Daniel, Histoire de France; Rish-
anger, Chronicle (Camden Society); Stubbs,
Select Charters. See also the Liber de Antiquis
Legibus; the Royal Letters (Rolls Series);
Rymer's Fodera; and Wright's Political Songs
The best modern accounts
(Rolls Series).
are in Blaauw, Barons' War; and Prothero,
[A. L. S.]
Simon de Montfort.

Amiens, TREATY OF (March 25, 1802), between England and France, put an end for the time to the great war which had lasted since 1793. The mutual losses during the preceding years, the complete supremacy of the English fleet, and the blow given to the northern alliance by the battle of Copenhagen, and, on the other hand, the defeats inflicted on England's Continental ally, Austria, in 1800, and the Treaty of Luneville, which she concluded with France, Feb. 9, 1801, led both governments to desire a cessation of hostilities. The treaty was the work of the Addington ministry. In the previous October the preliminaries had been agreed to and signed, but some troublesome negotiations had to be gone through, before it was finally ratified at Amiens, by Lord Cornwallis on the part of England, and by Joseph Bonaparte, assisted According to it, by Talleyrand, for France. England gave up all its conquests but Trinidad and Ceylon. The Cape of Good Hope was restored to the Dutch, but was to be a free port. Malta was to go back to the Knights of St. John, under the guarantee of one of "Cet article est le plus the great powers. important de tout le traité, mais aucune des conditions qu'il renferme n'a été exécutée; et il est devenu le pretexte d'une guerre qui s'est renouvelée en 1803, et a duré sans interruption jusqu'en 1814" (Histoire des Traités, vi. 149). Porto Ferrajo was to be evacuated. On the other hand, the Republic of the Ionian Islands was acknowledged; the French were to withdraw from Naples and the Roman States; the integrity of Portugal was to be guaranteed; Egypt was to be restored to the Porte; and, finally, the Newfoundland fisheries were to be placed on the same footing as they held before the war began. terms, as noticed above, were not considered sufficiently satisfactory by the English; consequently the peace was of very short duration, war being declared against Bonaparte in 1803.

These

For the complicated negotiations which accompanied the Treaty, see Koch et Schoell, Hist. des Traités, vi., chap. xxxi.; Von Sybel, Hist. of the French Revolution; Alison, Hist. of Europe; Massey, Hist. of George III.; Annual [S. J. L.] kegister, 1802.

Ancolites, THE, were a small British tribe, inhabiting probably part of Berkshire

and Oxfordshire. They are mentioned by Cæsar, but not by Ptolemy.

Ancrum Moor, BATTLE OF (Feb. 17, 1544), was fought in Roxburghshire, between the forces of Henry VIII., headed by Sir Ralph Evans and Sir Brian Latour, and the Scots, under the Earl of Angus, Scott of Buccleuch, and the Master of Rothes. The English were completely beaten, owing to their desertion by the Borderers who had joined them.

Anderida (Andredes-ceasTER), the name of a Roman fortress and settlement on the Sussex coast, which Camden placed at Newenden, in Kent, and others have considered to have been situated at Hastings, Chichester, or under the downs near Eastbourne, where, in 1717, Roman pavements, baths, and other remains were found. Most modern authorities agree in placing it on the site of Pevensey. The town was taken and burnt by the Saxons, under Ella, in 491, and the site was a desolate ruin in the time of Henry of Huntingdon. The Forest of Anderida (Andredes-weald) was the great belt of wood which stretched across south-eastern England through Hampshire, Kent, and Surrey, having a length of more than seventy, and in some places a breadth of over thirty, miles. The district still called the Weald may be held to mark out roughly the extent of the closer portions of this forest. [FORESTS.]

Henry of Huntingdon, Hist. Anglor., ii. § 10, &c.; Lower, Sussex.

Anderson, SIR EDMUND (b. 1540, d. 1605), one of Elizabeth's judges, was employed in the prosecutions of the Jesuits, as Queen's Sergeant, 1581. In the following year he was made Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, an office which he retained until his death. In 1586 he tried the conspirators in Babington's plot, and was one of the commissioners at the trial of Mary Queen of Scots, in Oct., 1586. He subsequently tried Davison for the issue of the warrant.

Anderton, William (d. 1693), was a violent Jacobite pamphleteer, in the reign of William III. For two years he evaded the government agents, but was at length traced to a house near St. James's Street. He attempted to conceal his press, but it was discovered, together with a tract called Remarks on the Present Confederacy and the Late Revolution. He was indicted for high treason before Treby at the Old Bailey. He denied that he had printed the libels. was argued in his favour, moreover, that, as printing was unknown in the reign of Edward III., it could not be construed into an overt act of treason, and that, under the statute of that sovereign, a further distinction ought to be made between the author of a treasonable pamphlet and the man who merely printed it. He was, however, found guilty, and after being kept for some time in suspense, in the

It

hope that he would betray his accomplices, was executed.

Cobbett's State Trials, xii. 1246; Ralph, Hist. of Eng. under William III., &c.

André, Major John (b.1751, d.1780), was the son of a London merchant. Entering the army, he rose rapidly. He was appointed to serve under General Howe in America, and, when Sir H. Clinton succeeded Howe, was made adjutant-general. His tact and ability in this position caused him to be selected, in the month of September, 1780, to superintend the negotiations for the surrender of West Point, on the Hudson River. The man he had to deal with on the other side was Arnold, an American general whose ambition was not satisfied with his position. An arrangement was made between the two for a meeting, to take place on the 17th, when Washington would be absent. The sloop which was carrying André to the meeting-place ran aground, and Arnold, on hearing of the mishap, refused to come down himself, but sent for André to come to him. André, on his return, found the sloop gone, and could not induce the boatmen to put off to her. He accordingly returned to Arnold, who persuaded him to exchange his uniform for a countryman's dress, and go back to the British lines by land. He accomplished the greater part of the journey in safety, and was already in sight of the British lines, when he was arrested, and, in spite of Arnold's passport, carried back to Washington. A court of inquiry was forthwith held; André was found to be a spy, and sentenced to death. Washington was most unwilling to carry out the sentence, and he endeavoured to seize Arnold, the real offender, in order to be able to release André. But Arnold was not to be found; and on Oct. 2, André met his fate with perfect composure. Washington himself declaring that he was more unfortunate than criminal. His bones were afterwards brought to England, and have been interred in Westminster Abbey.

J. Sparks, Life of Arnold; Rose, Biogr. Dict.

Andros, Sir Edmund (b. 1637, d. 1713), became governor of New York in 1674, and in 1685 was appointed governor of New England by James II. His administration was so unpopular with the colonists that, in 1688, all the colonies subject to him revolted, and he was sent back to England for trial, but acquitted. In 1692 he went out as governor of Virginia, holding the office with credit to himself and advantage to the country until 1698.

Angel was the name of a gold coin, first introduced into England in 1465. The value of an angel was originally 8s. 4d., but in Edward VI.'s time it was raised to 10s. It derived its name from the representation of the Archangel Michael which appeared on it.

Angels continued to be coined down to the reign of Charles I. [COINAGE.]

Angevins, THE, sometimes called PLANTAGENETS. Anjou first became connected with England by the marriage, in 1127, of Matilda, daughter of Henry I., with Geoffrey V., Count of Anjou. Their son Henry became King of England, as well as Count of Anjou. Anjou remained united to England till 1205, when Philip Augustus conquered it, and annexed it to the French crown.

For

a short time, during the reigns of Henry V. and Henry VI., it was again united to England; but in 1444 the latter king, on his marriage with Margaret of Anjou, ceded his claims. The Angevin rulers filled as great a space in the history of the Middle Ages as the Hapsburgs have done in more modern times. The first Count of Anjou was Fulk the Red, who at the end of the ninth century was thus rewarded for his services against the Northmen. But by the twelfth century, when the petty counts had added Saintonge, Maine, and Touraine to their territory, men began to throw their origin further back, into legends of an heroic champion, Ingelger, son of the wild Breton hunter, Tortulf; and accounted for that fitful energy and successful unscrupulousness which marked the whole race, by tales of an ancestress, who had been an evil spirit or a witch in guise of a lovely countess. In Fulk the Good there appears the other side of the Angevin character: the literary, poetic, and artistic tastes strong in Henry III. and Edward III., in Richard I. and Richard II., and partly shared by Henry II. and John; the capacity for business and the organising power which distinguished Henry II. and Edward I. So, too, the physical prowess of Richard I. was an inheritance from his ancestor, Geoffrey Greygown, the third count; while the fourth count, Fulk the Black, in his successful adventurousness, his restless pilgrimages to Jerusalem, his cruel revenges on his wife and son, seems to anticipate familiar stories of our own Plantagenet kings. With Fulk's son, Geoffrey Martel, the original Angevin line ends, to be continued by his daughter's marriage with Geoffrey of the House of Orleans. Their son, Fulk Rechin, "to whom alone it is due that the charge of trickery is urged against this family," brought upon himself many enemies and some disasters. The next count, Fulk the Young, had already secured Maine by marriage; and his successor, Geoffrey the Handsome, called Plantagenet, by his marriage with the Empress Matilda, heiress to Henry I. of England, raised to its climax the long advancement of his house. Their son, Henry II. of England, succeeded, in 1151, to Anjou, Maine, and Touraine from his father, and Normandy from his mother, and received, in 1152, Poitou, Limoges, Auvergne, Guienne, and

Gascony, with Eleanor, the divorced wife of Louis of France. He was crowned King of England in 1154, made himself Lord of Ireland in 1171, exacted full homage from the captive King of Scots in 1174, and obtained for his second son, Geoffrey, the succession to Brittany by marriage. In 1170 Anjou was set apart, with Maine and Normandy, to form a temporary dominion for his eldest son, Henry, as Aquitaine was for Richard, Brittany for Geoffrey, and Ireland for John. But with the accession of John "Lackland," Anjou, like most of the other French possessions of the English crown, passed to Philip of France in 1202. Before this, Ralph de Diceto, finding a pious explanation for the success which had now reached such a height, had declared "the prophecy made to Fulk the Good by the leper whom he carried so piously (and who was none other than the Saviour Himself), that his seed should prosper to the ninth generation, is being fulfilled." But most men spoke otherwise of the Angevins. Thus Giraldus Cambrensis, not content with recounting their diabolic origin, St. Bernard's prediction of their curse, and Richard Coeur de Lion's gloomy acceptance of it ("Let us fight; son with father, brother with brother; it is instinct in our family: from the devil we all came, to the devil we shall all go "), draws out furthermore the calamitous end of all the offspring of Eleanor, as a vengeance foretold for her parents' adulterous union; he recites the visions which warned holy men of the punishment reserved for Henry II.'s sins against the Church, and points the moral of the breakdown of that great king's empire, after all his subtle schemes and his toilsome, gainful life, before the divinelyfavoured roval house of France. This indeed was the feeling which many men had about the Angevins; not without some reason. "They remind us," says Dr. Stubbs, "of those unhappy spirits who, throughout the Middle Ages, were continually spending superhuman strength in building in a night inaccessible bridges and uninhabitable castles, or purchasing with untold treasures souls that might have been had for nothing, and invariably cheated of their reward." There is, indeed, in all the English kings of this race, even in Edward I., something of this waste of vast energies upon futile results, which are no sooner grasped than they crumble in the hand. They had not, with all their insight, that rare gift of penetrating to the real heart of their age, the gift that only sympathy with it can give. Even Edward I. could not see that he was, in his own despite, making of Scotland what he had already made of England-a self-governing patriotic nation. Yet to this dynasty England owes much. Henry II. not only finally defeated the feudal class by superseding its privileged jurisdic tion, by subduing it to his strong centralised

Ang

system, by withdrawing its military basis, but he also set up a counterpoise to it in the revived popular courts, in the developed use of local juries, in the reconstituted national militia, in the legalised liberties of the towns. In a word, he began the varied training of the English people to co-operation in the work of government, which Edward I. took up and Moreover, carried on to its completion.

And

the very tyranny and neglect of the other
kings were direct instruments of benefits
never intended. Richard I.'s careless absence
and heavy exactions left his ministers free to
expand the principles bequeathed them from
Henry II.'s reign. A still greater debt of
gratitude we owe to the misgovernment of
John, the worst of the line, inasmuch as
it alone supplied the pressure which could
force the baronage for the first time to act
with and for Church and people, and produced
the coalition which extorted the Great
Charter. Henry III.'s shiftiness recalled this
coalition into action so often that it became
a permanent union. The second Edward's
failure taught the nation that a vigorous
kingship was still a requisite of political
stability, to control the baronage, and to be
the working head of the government. Ed-
ward III., in his selfish haste for the means
of warfare and ostentation, sold away the
crown's power of extra-parliamentary inter-
ference in taxation and legislation.
Richard II.'s unsuccessful attempt at abso-
lutism precipitated the downfall of preroga-
tive, and gave constitutional government
sixty years in which to strike its roots down
too deep even for the destroying hand of
Yorkist, Tudor, and Stuart kings to kill their
latent life. And it is to the stern peace kept
by the Angevin kings, to their repression of
private justice and private war, to their firm
but prudent attitude to the Church, that we
owe the early rise of English literature and
philosophy, the great age of the English
Church, the enfranchisement of the peasantry,
the populous independence of the towns, the
growth of wool-trade and maritime commerce.
All the Angevins were men of strong but con-
flicting character; none were without physical
bravery, bodily activity, passionate emotions.
Even the worst were men who superstitiously
respected some forms of religion, while they
violated its spirit: like Henry II., jesting and
drawing pictures at mass, but dying before the
chapel altar at Chinon; or Richard, after an
agony of repentance for his sins, recovering,
to plunge into them afresh. All inflicted, and
in turn suffered, the ancestral curse, the pangs
of filial or fraternal ingratitude. None are con-
temptible, save, perhaps, Henry III.; none,
save John, fail to win some sympathy. They
must remain to us as they were to their con-
temporaries-a marvellous race, with many
elements of greatness, with immense personal
endowments, and a certain mysterious shadow
hanging over all; whose work, to which they

sacrificed their peace and domestic happiness,
and too often their conscience and fame, for
the most part was destined to pass away, but
through whom other results were brought
about, destined to be of incalculable value and
indestructible permanence.

Henry II.
Richard I.
John

Henry III.

ANGEVIN KINGS OF ENGLAND.

[ocr errors]

.

1154-1189 | Edward I.
1189-1199 Edward II.

1272-1307

1307-1327

1327-1377

1377-1399

1199-1216 Edward III.
1216-1272 Richard II..

Chroniques d'Anjou, with preface by M.
Mabille, 1871; the works of Benedictus Abbas,
Roger de Hoveden, Ralph de Diceto, William of
Newburgh, Itinerarium Regis Ricardi (in the
Rolls Series), Walter of Coventry, Matthew Paris,
Giraldus Cambrensis (especially, his De Institu-
tione Principum), and Ralph Niger. See also
Lingard, Hist. of Eng.; Hallam, Mid. Ages;
Stubbs, Constitutional History; Dr. Pauli,
Geschichte von England (from Edward I. to
Richard II.); Longman, Life and Times of
Edward III.; M. Wallon, Richard II.

[A. L. S.]

Angles, THE. If identity of name and general probability be held fair proofs of identity of race, the Angles (Angli, Anglii), after whom this land is called, are first mentioned in the Germania of Tacitus (written about A.D. 98), seemingly as dwellers on the farther side of the Elbe. But in Tacitus's page they are merely one among a number of obscure names of German peoples. They would seem, however, to have been then in motion westwards; fifty years later Ptolemy found them on the left bank of the same river, in occupation of a territory conjectured to be in the neighbourhood of the modern town of Magdeburg. But neither did they remain here; by the fourth century, if not earlier, they had established themselves on the neck of the northern peninsula, now Jutland, and filled the district that is now known as Schleswig, but which an English writer of the tenth century (Ethelward) names Anglia Vetus, or Old England. And Bede, in calling this country of theirs Angulus, suggests a hint regarding the origin of their name, which a weighty authority, Dr. Guest, has not scrupled to take, speaking of their Continental home as "Ongle," and apparently looking upon them as "men of the corner." Next to nothing is told us of the Angles in written history. Scholars are, however, satisfied that they were of the LowGerman stock, and were closely akin to, yet distinct from, the Saxons, having a speech that, though essentially the same as the Saxon, was not so far removed from the HighGerman, and showed more frequent marks of Scandinavian influence. But, like the Saxons, they were of pure German type; Roman civilisation had never reached them. legal code, the Laws of the Anglii and Werini, presumably belonging to them, and as old as the eighth century, survives as a record of native usages in an intermediate stage between those of the Germania

A

and of the earliest-known English system. In the sixth century, at various but unknown dates, and by many but unconnected expeditions, the Angles crossed over to Britain, and conquered to their own use the whole of the east coast, from the Stour to the Forth. Pushing steadily their encroachments westwards, and slaying, expelling, or enslaving the bulk at least of the natives, they eventually formed several powerful kingdoms, and not a few smaller statesfought and prospered until two-thirds of the conquered land had passed into their possession. This great movement is believed to have caused an exhaustive migration of the race; Bede is our authority for a report that their fatherland was without inhabitants even in his time. Yet some will have it that their name still abides there in the local term, Angeln. In Britain, though they just missed winning political supremacy, they fixed their name ineffaceably on the whole German population and the land it lived in.

Many have speculated upon, but none gained any solid knowledge of, their distinguishing characteristics; it would seem, however, that wherever they differed from their Saxon brethren, they more nearly resembled their Danish cousins.

Elton, Origins of English History, ch. xii.; Stubbs, Constitutional History, ch. iii.; Skene, Celtic Scotland, book i., ch. iv.; and the works

of Tacitus, Ptolemy, and Bede. [J. R.] Anglesey (Latin, Mona; Welsh, Môn), an island and county of North Wales, was in the earliest times celebrated as the headquarters of Druidism, and therefore of resistance to the Romans. It was conquered by Suetonius Paulinus in A.D. 61, and again more thoroughly by Agricola in 78. On the withdrawal of the Romans, it became the centre of the power of the kings of North Wales, or Gwynedd, and Gildas calls the famous Maelgwn "insularis draco." Yet it was conquered, with much other Welsh territory, by Edwin of Northumbria (Bede, ii. 5), and perhaps this Anglian conquest explains Nennius-"Mona insula quæ Anglice Englesei vocatur id est insula Anglorum" (Mon. Hist. Brit., 52 D.). But Northumbria soon fell, and the "isle of the English" became Welsh again. It contained Aberffraw, the chief palace of the kings of Gwynedd. During the ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries, it was repeatedly ravaged by the Danes, who very probably effected permanent settlements in it. After

[ocr errors]

the Norman Conquest, it became the battleground of Irish Dane, native Welsh, and Norman adventurers. Under William Rufus, it was more than once captured by Earl Hugh of Chester, when the French reduced all to be Saxons" (Brut-y-Tys., sub an. 1096). Again, in 1098, it was the scene of the exploits of Magnus of Norway, and of the death of Hugh. But it soon got back its liberty, and has retained to this day that in

tensely Welsh character (Môn mam Cymru ") which makes its name 80 misleading. It continued the home of the princes of North Wales until the fall of Llewelyn ap Gruffydd annexed the principality to the crown, and it was erected into a regular county by Henry VIII. [COUNTIES, WELSH.]

Rowland's Mona Antiqua Restaurata hopelessly confuses the history with fable. A History of Anglesey (London, 1775) is little better. The chief facts are in Miss Williams' History of Wales, and Freeman, William Rujus, vi. 127, seq. [T. F. T.]

in

Anglesey, PEERAGE OF. In 1628 Sir Francis Annesley, of Newport Pagnell, Bucks, was created Baron Mount Norris in the peerage of Ireland, and Viscount Valentia. It was this nobleman who was arbitrarily tried and condemned to death by Strafford, when Lord Deputy in 1635. Arthur, second Viscount Valentia (1614-1686), was, 1645, sent as Commissioner to Ulster to oppose Owen Roe O'Neil. After the death of Cromwell, he was President of the Council of State, and took a considerable share in bringing about the Restoration. In 1660 he was created Earl of Anglesey in the peerage of England. During the life of Richard, sixth Earl of Anglesey, the title and estates were claimed by James Annesley, who asserted that he was the son of the fourth Earl. [For the litigation which ensued on this claim, see ANNESLEY'S CASE.] As a result of this litigation, it was held that the earldom of Anglesey became extinct in 1761, on the death of the sixth Earl. In 1815 the title of Marquis of Anglesey was conferred on Henry Paget, Earl of Uxbridge.

Anglesey, Arthur Annesley, 5TH EARL OF (d. 1737), held several posts in Ireland in the reign of Queen Anne. In 1711 he hastened from Ireland to take part in the debates on the war, and commented severely on the exhaustion of the country, hinting that Marlborough had averted peace from interested motives. But on a subsequent occasion he attacked the ministry, and publicly apologised for the part he had played in politics. During the last years of Queen Anne, he was one of the leaders of the faction of Hanoverian Tories, whom Swift calls the "Whimsicals." He was one of the Lords Justices appointed to administer the kingdom between the death of Anne and the arrival of George I.

Anglesey, Henry William Paget, 1ST MARQUIS OF (b. 1768, d. 1854), eldest son of Henry, first Earl of Uxbridge, in 1794 served under the Duke of York in Flanders, and again in Holland in 1799, as colonel of a dragoon regiment. In December, 1808, he joined Sir John Moore's force as a majorgeneral, and greatly distinguished himself by the manner in which he covered the dis

« PreviousContinue »