 | United States. Congress - Law - 1832 - 756 pages
...rest. Mr. Madison says, in the most explicit terms, that " the jurisdiction hi controversies between u State and citizens of another State is much objected...can have is, that, if a State should wish to bring suit against u citizen, it must be in the Federal Court. This will give satisfaction to individuals,... | |
 | United States. Congress - Law - 1832 - 756 pages
...rest. Mr. Madison says, in the most explicit terms, that "the jurisdiction in controversies between a State and citizens of another State is much objected...can have is, that, if a State should wish to bring suit against a citizen, it must be in the Federal Court. This will give satisfaction to individuals,'... | |
 | Jonathan Elliot - United States - 1836 - 686 pages
...impropriety in referring such disputes to this tribunal. Its jurisdiction in controversies between a state and citizens of another state is much objected...citizen, it must be brought before the federal court. This will give satisfaction to individuals, as it will prevent citizens, on whom a state may have a... | |
 | Jonathan Elliot, United States. Constitutional Convention - Constitutional conventions - 1836 - 692 pages
...disputes to this tribunal. Its jurisdiction in controversies between a state and citizens of another slate is much objected to, and perhaps without reason. It is not in the power of individuals to call ajiy state into court. The only operation it can have, is thatpifci state should wish to bring a suit... | |
 | Stephen Franks Miller - Georgia - 1858 - 488 pages
...rest. Mr. Madison says, in the most explicit terms, that " The jurisdiction in controversies between a State and citizens of another State is much objected to, and perhaps without reason. It is not in ike power of individuals to call any State into court. The only operation it can have is, that if a... | |
 | Jonathan Elliot - Constitutional history - 1861 - 684 pages
...improrrietv in referring such disputes to this tribunal. Its jurisdiction in controversies between a state and citizens of another state is much objected...without reason. It is not in the power of individuals to ca" any state into court. The only operation it can have, is that, if a state should wish to bring... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - Law reports, digests, etc - 1870 - 788 pages
...a careful exposition of the judiciary clause, calmed the Virginia convention by assuring it that " it is not in the power of individuals to call any State into court. The only operation the clause can have is, that if a State should wish to bring a suit against a citizen, it must be brought... | |
 | Jonathan Elliot - Constitutional law - 1876 - 692 pages
...jurisdiction In controversies between a state and citi zens of another state is much objected to, and perhap« without reason. It is not in the power of individuals...citizen, it must be brought before the federal court. This will give satisfaction to individuals, as it will prevent citizens, on whom a state may have a... | |
 | Virginia. General Assembly. House of Delegates - Virginia - 1878 - 914 pages
...courts, and to be compelled to obey federal decisions. In the Virginia convention Mr. Madison said : " It is not in the power of individuals to call any State into court " ; ami Mr. Marshall, afterwards chief-justice, said : " I hope no gentleman will think that a State... | |
 | Constitutional history - 1881 - 688 pages
...in referring such disputes to this tribunal. Its jurisdiction In controversies between a state aud citizens of another state is much objected to, and...citizen, it must be brought before the federal court. This will give satisfaction to individuals, as it will prevent citizens, on whom a state may have a... | |
| |
It is not in the power of individuals to call any state into court. The only operation it can have, is that, if a state should wish to bring a suit against a citizen, it must be brought before the federal court. 
