Proposed Amendments to Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, Relating to Cloture: Hearings Before a Special Subcommittee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, First Session, on S. Res. 17, S. Res. 19, S. Res. 21, S. Res. 28, S. Res. 29, S. Res. 30, S. Res. 32, S. Res. 171, Resolutions Proposing Amendments to Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate. June 17, 24, 25, 28, July 2, 9, 16, 1957
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Rules and Administration, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Rules and Administration. Special Subcommittee on Amendments to Rule XXII.
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1957 - Cloture - 364 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action adopted amendment American appear believe bill body called Chairman citizens civil rights close cloture committee Congress consider consideration Constitution continuing convention course Court decision democratic discussion effect effort elected executive existing expressed fact favor Federal feel filibuster follows force freedom further give hearings House important individual interest issue January legislation liberty limit majority rule matter means measure minority motion opinion opposed organization party passed pending permit political possible practice present President principle procedure proposed protection question reason record referred Representatives Republican resolution rule XXII Senate Resolution Senate rule Senator Javits Senator TALMADGE session speak speech stand statement subcommittee Thank things tion two-thirds United States Senate unlimited debate Vice President views vote Washington wish
Page 200 - ... any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied? I think not. Happily the human mind is so constituted that no party can reach to the audacity of doing this. Think, if you can, of a single instance in which a plainly written provision of the Constitution has ever been denied. If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might, in a moral point of view, justify revolution — certainly would if such a right...
Page 200 - All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that, though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable ; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression.
Page 342 - ... no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion. If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.
Page 340 - Except by unanimous consent, no amendment shall be in order after the vote to bring the debate to a close, unless the same has been presented and read prior to that time. No dilatory motion, or dilatory amendment, or amendment not germane shall be in order. Points of order, including questions of relevancy, and appeals from the decision of the Presiding Officer, shall be decided without debate.
Page 166 - ... United States is the only legislative body in the world which cannot act when its majority is ready for action.
Page 293 - Second. A motion to proceed to the consideration of any other bill on the Calendar, -which motion shall not be open to amendment. Third. A motion to pass over the pending subject, which, if carried, shall have the effect to leave such subject without prejudice in its place on the Calendar. Fourth. A motion to place such subject at the foot of the Calendar. Each of the foregoing motions shall be decided without debate...
Page 352 - No political dreamer was ever wild enough to think of breaking down the lines which separate the States, and of compounding the American people into one common mass.
Page 147 - Neither house can continue any portion of itself in any parliamentary function beyond the end of the session without the consent of the other two branches. When done, it is by a bill constituting them commissioners for the particular purpose.
Page 213 - Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.
Page 9 - Senators, to bring to a close the debate upon any measure, motion, or other matter pending before the Senate, or the unfinished business, is presented to the Senate, the Presiding Officer shall at once state the motion to the Senate, and one hour after the Senate meets on the following calendar day but one, he shall lay the motion before the Senate and direct that the Secretary call the roll, and, upon the ascertainment that a quorum is present, the Presiding Officer i As amended, S.