« PreviousContinue »
OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, ,
AND FROM OTHER
AUTHENTIC SOURCES OF INFORMATION,
RELATIVE TO THE
RIGHTS CLAIMED BY ROMAN CATHOLICS TO
&c. &c. &c.
TENDING TO SHEW
HOW FAR THE CLAIMANTS ENJOYED THOSE PRIVILEGES FROM
OF KING WILLIAM III.
Printed by Richard Grace, Mary-Street:
1030023 - 190.
The Reader's attention is particularly called to the subjoined
DOCUMENTS, of indubitable Authority : No. 1.—Shews that Members of Parliament were not obiged to
take the Oath of Supremacy before the time of King
William III. DOCUMENTS, page 1. 2 and 3.-Shew the only Oath that was necessary to be taken
by certain descriptions of Persons in Ireland to enable
them to enjoy Rights, &c. p. p. 3 and 4. 4, 5, and 6.—Shew that Charles I. and Charles II. entered
into the most Solemn Treaties with the Irish Roman Catholics to secure to them the Right of Sitting and
Voting in Parliament, &c. p. p. 5, 13, and 30. 7.-Shews the first attempt ever made to exclude the Roman
Catholic Members from the House of Commons, by the
Puritan Party in that House, in 1642, page 51. 8.-Shews King Charles II.'s recognition of the validity of the
Treaties of 1646 and 1648, made between the Duke of
Ormond and the Irish Catholics; page 93. 9.-Shews the Peers who voted for the Act of Settlement, p. 56. 10, 11 and 12.—Shew that Catholic Peers constantly sat in the
Irish House of Lords in the Parliaments of Charles II.; the distinction made in the Rules of the House, re. specting hours of attendance of Protestant and Catholic
Peers, p. p. 57, 60 and 61. 13.-Shews the Right, and the exercise of the Right, of Roman
Catholics to Sit in the House of Commons in the Reign of Charles II.
61. 14 and 15.-Shew the Right of Catholics 10 sit in Parliament,
and to their Freedom and Votes in Corporations at the
latter end of the Reign of Charles II. p. p, 64 and 66. 16.--The Treaty of Limerick, page 68. 17.-Shows the Proceedings in the Parliament in 1695, to ex
clude Catholics from their Seats in Parliament, page 79. 18.-Shews the proceedings in the Parliament in 1697, on pass
ing the Bill for the Confirmation of the Articles of Limerick, with the Protest of fourteen Protestant Peers against the injustice of Parliament in violating those Articles, which they did by that Bill, page 82.
ERRATA. In DOCUMENTS, Page 59, before the name of the
Earl of Anglesea, dele *. In heading of DOCUMENT, No. 14, Page 64, for
(This ard another Paper, concerning the Nominees, were sent April 10th, 1675, by the Lord Conway to the Lord Ranelagh, one of King Charles the Second's Ministers in England, by His Excellency Arthur Capel Earl of Essex, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.)-read, (This and another Paper, concerning the Nominees,
were sent by the Lord Conway to the Earl of Arlingtor.) In same heading, for Page 158, read Page 185.
The privation of Civil Rights under which the Roman Catholic subjects of these Kingdoms have unjustly suffered for a number of generations, and under which they still labour, has, for a long series of
years, kept this nation in a state of agitation and discontent." For a redress of their grievances they have, almost year after year, for upwards of thirty years, in the most humble manner supplicated the Legislature. But their efforts have been unavailing. Bigotry and intolerance have triumphed over justice and humanity, and the Roman Catholics have still the mortification to feel themselves a degraded people in the land of their nativity, beside the loss of benefits which by the law of God and nature they have a right to enjoy, in common with the most favoured of their fellow-subjects. For a restoration of those rights the Catholics claim the benefit of treaties, solemnly entered into with them, and which secure to them the possession of those rights. Of these treaties that of Limerick, as being the last, and the fulfilment thereof being secured to them by the royal word of King William the Third, the Catholics claim the full benefit. The justice of their claims in this respect their enemies have been obliged to allow; and a violent opposer of those claims, a gentleman bigh in office, has declared, that if it can be proved that the Catholics of Ireland have been deprived of any rights secured to them by that treaty, he will himself vote for Catholic Emancipation. To satisfy the mind of that gentleman, and of all others who may be desirous to know how far, the claims of the Catholics are countenanced by the