Page images
PDF
EPUB

227. DIVISION OF ONE FRACTIONAL QUANTITY BY AN

OTHER.

ANALYSIS.

1. If of a bushel of wheat cost of a dollar, what is that per bushel?

To find the cost per bushel, we must divide the price by the quantity (154), that is, we must divide by. But to divide a number by a frac tion, we multiply it by the denominator, and divide the product by the 3X4 12 numerator (226); hence, we must multiply by 4, as 5

12 is divided by 3, by multiplying the denominator, 5, by 3, as, of a dollar then is the price of one bushel. Hence,

(121);

-228. To divide a fraction by a fraction.

(220), and

12 12

15

RULE.-Multiply the numerator of the dividend by the denominator of the divisor for a new numerator, and the denominator of the dividend by the numerator of the divisor, for a new denominator.

NOTE. In practice, it will be most convenient to invert the divisor, and then proceed as in Art. 224.

?

QUESTIONS FOR PRACTICE.

2. In 7 how many times Ans. 4.

3. In 22 how many times

22.?

5. If of a yard cost of a dollar, what is that a yard? Ans. 16-$1.773,

Ans. 118-1

6. If

buy for

4. At of a dollar a bushel for oats, how many can I of a dollar?

be worth

of a piece of cloth of of an eagle,

what is the whole piece worth? Ans. eag.

[blocks in formation]

A fraction is multiplied by multiplying its numerator, and divided by multiplying its denominator (219); hence if we multiply both the terms of a fraction at the same time by any number, we both multiply and divide the fraction by the same number, and therefore do not alter its value. Again, a fraction is divided by dividing its numerator, and multiplied by dividing its denominator (219); hence if we divide both the terms of a fraction at the same time by any number, we both divide and multiply the fraction by the same number, and therefore do not alter its value. Hence,

[blocks in formation]

1. If the two terms of a fraction be 8 and 38, what is the greatest number that will divide them both without a remainder?

8) 38 (4 32

6)8(1

It is evident that the greatest common divisor of 8 and 38, cannot exceed the smallest of them. We will therefore see if 8, which divides itself, and gives 1 for the quotient, will divide 38; if it will, it is manifestly the greatest common divisor sought. But dividing 38: by 8, we obtain a quotient, 4, and a remainder, 6; hence 8 is not a common divisor. Again, it is evident, that the common divisor of 8 and 38 must also divide 6, because 38 4 times 8 plus 6; hence a number which will divide 8 and 6 will also divide 8 and 38; we will therefore see if 6, which divides itself, will divide 8. But dividing 8 by 6, v have a quotient 1, and remainder 2; hence 6 is not a common divisor. Again, for the reason above state, the common divisor of 6 and 8 must also divide the remainder, 2; and by dividing 6 by 2, we find that 2, which divides itself, divides 6 also; 2 is therefore a divisor of 6 and 8, and it has been shown that a number which will divide 6 and 8, will also divide 8 and 38. Hence 2 is the common divisor of 8 and 38, and it is evidently the greatest common divisor, since it is manifest from the method of obtaining it that 2 will divide by it, and a number will not divide by another greater than itself. Therefore,

233. To find the greatest common divisor of two numbers..

RULE. Divide the greater number by the less, and the divisor by the remainder, and so on, always dividing the last divisor by the last remainder, till nothing remains; then will the last divisor be the common divisor required.

QUESTIONS FOR PRACTICE.

2. What is the greatest common divisor of 580, 320 Common divisor of 24 and 36? and 45?

[blocks in formation]

Ans. 5.

NOTE.-When there are more than two numbers, find the common divisor of two, then of that divisor and one of the others, and so on to the last.

6. What is the greatest common divisor of 918, 1998 and 522? Ans. 18.

REDUCTION OF FRACTIONS ΤΟ THEIR MOST

SIMPLE EXPRESSION.

ANALYSIS.

of

1. What is the most simple expression, or the least terms

?

The terms of a fraction are diminished, or made more simple, by division (230). Now, if we divide so long as we can find any number greater than 1 which will divide them both without a remainder, the fraction will evidently be diminished to the least terms which are capable of expressing it, since the two terms now contain no common factor greater than anity. Thus, 2)=238, 2)236=13, 2)13=4, and 2)=. least terms. Or if we find the greatest common divisor of the two terms, 48 and 272, we may evidently reduce the fraction to its lowest terms at once by dividing the two terins by it. By Art. 233, we find the greatest common divisor to be 16, and 16), least terms as before. Hence,

48

48

235. To reduce a fraction to its least terms.

RULE.-Divide both the terins of the fraction by the greatest common divisor, and the quotient will be the fraction in its least

terms.

QUESTIONS FOR PRACTICE.

2. What are the least terms

[blocks in formation]

5. Reduce

to its least

[blocks in formation]

£36, 237, 238.

236.

VULGAR FRACTIONS.

COMMON MULTIPLES OF NUMBERS.

1. What number is a common multiple of 3, 4, 8 and 121

97

3X4X8X19 1152. Ans. First, 3 times 4 are 12; 12 then is made up of fours, or 4 threes; it is, therefore, divisible by 3 and 4. Again, 8 times 12 are 96; then 96 is divisible by 8, and as it is made up of 8 12s, each of which is divisible by 3 and 4, 96 is divisible by 3, 4 and 8. Again, 12 times 96 are 1152; 1152 then is divisible by 12; and as it is made up of 12 ninety-sixes, each of which is divisible by 3, 4 and 8, 1152 is divisible by 3, 4, 8 and 12; it is therefore a common multiple of these numbers (215. Def. 9).

237. 2. What is the least common multiple of 3, 4, 8 and 12!

4)3, 4, 8, 12 3)3, 1, 2, 3

1,1,2, 1 4×3×2-24

Every number will evidently divide by all its factors: our object then to find the least number of which each of the numbers, 3, 4, 8 and 12 is a factor. Ranging the numbers in a line, and dividing such as are divisible by 4, we separate 4, 8 and 12, each into two factors, one of which, 4, is common, and the others, 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Now as the products of the divisor, multiplied by the quotients, are, severally, divisible by their respective dividends, the products of these products by the other quotients, must also be divisible by the dividends; for these products are only the dividends a certain number of times repeated. The continued product then of the divisor, 4, and the quotient 1, 2, 3, (4×1×2×3—24) is divisible by each of the dividends, 4, 8 and 12, and 24 is obviously the least number which is divisible by 4, 8 and 12, since 12 will not divide by 8, and no number greater than 12, and less than twice 12, or 24, will divide by 12. But the undivided number, 3, must also divide the number sought; we therefore bring it down with the quotients, and dividing the numbers by 3, which are divisible by it, we find that 3 is already a factor of 24, and will therefore divide 24. Thus, by dividing such of the given numbers as have a common factor by this factor, we suppress all but one of the common factors of each kind, and the continued product of the divisors, and the numbers in the last line, which include the quotients and undivided numbers, will contain the factors of all the given numbers, and may therefore be divided by each of them without a remainder; and since the same number is never taken more than once as a factor, the product is evidently the least number that can be so divided. Hence,

238. To find the least common multiple of two or more numbers.

RULE. Arrange the given numbers in a line, and divide by any number that will divide two or more of them without a remainder, setting the quotients and undivided numbers in a line below. Divide the second line as before, and so on till there are no two numbers remaining, which can be exactly divided by any number greater than unity; then will the continued preduct of the several divisors, and numbers in the lower line be the multiple required.

[blocks in formation]

1. Reduce of a dollar and 2 of a dollar to a common denominator.

If each term of, the first fraction, be multiplied by 5, the denominator of the second, the becomes, and if each term of, the second, be multiplied by 2, the denominator of the first, becomes; then, instead of and, we have the two equivalent fractions, and fo (230), which have 10 for a common denominator.

2. Reduce, and to a common denominator.

Multiplying the terms of Į by 24, the product of 4 and 6, the denominators of the other two fractions, becomes ; again, multiply the terms of by 18, the product of 3 and 6, the denominators of the first and third fractions, becomes ; and lastly, multiplying the terms of by 12, the product of 3 and 4, the denominators of the first and second, becomes

; then instead of the fractions, and, we have the three equivalent, fractions, 4, and 2, which have 12 for a common denominator. From a careful examination of the above, the reason of the following rule will be manifest.

240. To reduce fractions of different denominators to equiva lent fractions having a common denominator.

RULE. Multiply all the denominators together for the common denominator, and each numerator by all the denominators except its own for the new numerators,

« PreviousContinue »