Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of ArgumentationF.H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik C.W. Krabbe is a logician who proudly defends a formal dialectical approach to argumentation. Daniel H. Cohen, Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Fred J. Kauffeld, C. Scott Jacobs, Christian Kock, Christian Plantin, Sorin Stati, Chris Reed, Douglas N. |
Contents
DISCOURSE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ARGUMENTATIVE AND GRAMMATICAL SEQUENCES | 189 |
DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES AND CRITICAL QUESTIONS | 195 |
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY AND THE CONCEPT OF LAW | 213 |
ARGUERS OBLIGATIONS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE | 227 |
CHARLES S PEIRCES THEORY OF ABDUCTION AND THE ARISTOTELIAN ENTHYMEME FROM SIGNS¹ | 237 |
RHETORIC AND DIALECTIC IN MARTIN LUTHER KINGS LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL | 255 |
ON THE ARGUMENTATIVE QUALITY OF EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES | 269 |
THE WILES OF ARGUMENT | 283 |
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LOGIC DIALECTIC AND RHETORIC | 91 |
LOGICAL FALLACIES DIALECTICAL TRANSGRESSIONS RHETORICAL SINS AND OTHER FAILURES OF RATIONALITY IN ARGUMENT... | 109 |
A PRAGMATIC VIEW OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF | 123 |
THE ORDINARY PRACTICE OF PRESUMING AND PRESUMPTION WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO VERACITY AND THE BURDEN OF PR... | 133 |
TWO CONCEPTIONS OF OPENNESS IN ARGUMENTATION THEORY | 147 |
MULTIDIMENSIONALITY AND NONDEDUCTIVENESS IN DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENTATION | 157 |
ARGUMENTATION STUDIES IN FRANCE | 173 |
FELICITY CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AD HOMINEM | 297 |
THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN NORMATIVELYGOOD ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICE AND PERSUASIVE SUCCESS | 309 |
THE CONCEPT OF ARGUMENT QUALITY IN THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL | 319 |
HOW NARRATIVE ARGUMENTATION WORKS | 337 |
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action analysis answer appeal application approach argu arguer argument audience believe Bermuda burden called claim communication concept concern conclusion consider consistent context cost Court critical decision defend deliberative developed dialectical dialogue discourse discussion distinction Eemeren effect evaluation evidence example expert explanation fact fallacies function give given grounds important inference interest involved issue Johnson judgment kind least logic matter means ment move narrative norms objections obligation opinion participants particular party person persuasive position possible practice premises present Press presumption principles problem proof proposal proposition question rational reasons reference relation relevant requires respect responses result rhetoric rules scheme seems sense situation social specific speech standpoint statement stories strong studies suggests theory things tion true turn University validity warrant weak