Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 61Published for John Conrad and Company, 1858 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page viii
... . Spencer ........ Leitensdorfer v . Webb ........ Leroy et al . v . Wade ......... Lyon v . Bertrim et al .......... Marks v . Dickson ......... Marshall and Barton v . Irvine ........... Mason et al . v . Dean ........ ...........
... . Spencer ........ Leitensdorfer v . Webb ........ Leroy et al . v . Wade ......... Lyon v . Bertrim et al .......... Marks v . Dickson ......... Marshall and Barton v . Irvine ........... Mason et al . v . Dean ........ ...........
Page ix
... Leitensdorfer et al ......... White et al . v . Burnley ........ Wayte v . Gibbes et al ....... Wiley et al . v . Brown ....... Williams v . Gibbes et al ....... Williamson v . Suydam ......... .216 .... 34 .448 .135 ..176 235 541 535 ..427 ...
... Leitensdorfer et al ......... White et al . v . Burnley ........ Wayte v . Gibbes et al ....... Wiley et al . v . Brown ....... Williams v . Gibbes et al ....... Williamson v . Suydam ......... .216 .... 34 .448 .135 ..176 235 541 535 ..427 ...
Page 175
... competent evidence to go to a jury , of a regular notice of the dishonor of a bill , and to warrant a jury in presuming that a regular notice had been given . Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . ( Thornton DECEMBER TERM , 1857 . 175.
... competent evidence to go to a jury , of a regular notice of the dishonor of a bill , and to warrant a jury in presuming that a regular notice had been given . Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . ( Thornton DECEMBER TERM , 1857 . 175.
Page 176
... LEITENSDORFER AND JOAB HOUGHTON , PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR , V. JAMES J. WEBB . L - ed 891 9wa133 15wa384 20wa394 22wa 296 21wa 88 When New Mexico was conquered by the United States , it was only the allegiance of the people that was changed ...
... LEITENSDORFER AND JOAB HOUGHTON , PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR , V. JAMES J. WEBB . L - ed 891 9wa133 15wa384 20wa394 22wa 296 21wa 88 When New Mexico was conquered by the United States , it was only the allegiance of the people that was changed ...
Page 177
United States. Supreme Court. Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . Upon the acquisition , in the year 1846 , by the arms of the United States , of the Territory of New ... Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . and their DECEMBER TERM , 1857 . 177.
United States. Supreme Court. Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . Upon the acquisition , in the year 1846 , by the arms of the United States , of the Territory of New ... Leitensdorfer et al . v . Webb . and their DECEMBER TERM , 1857 . 177.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action admiralty jurisdiction adverse possession affirmed alleged appeal appellee assigned attachment authority averment Bank bankrupt bill of exceptions brought Burnley Cambuston cause champerty charge Circuit Court citizen claim common law Company complainant Constitution contract conveyance counsel court martial court of equity creditor Crescent City damages debt decision declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer dismissed District Court equity evidence execution facts filed fraud Government grant Hudgins interest issue John judge judgment judicial judiciary act jury Justice L-ed land Leitensdorfer lien Louisiana maritime marshal ment motion Myers & Company navigable owner parties patent payment person petition plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession principle proceedings purchase question record refused Republic of Texas river rule ship Sigerson statute Steamboat Magnolia suit Supreme Court taken Taylor term Texas tion tow-boat trial United verdict vessel void Williams writ of error
Popular passages
Page 215 - And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ...
Page 301 - ... exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burden, within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas...
Page 92 - The navigable waters leading into the Mississippi and St Lawrence, and the carrying places between the same, shall be common highways and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the said Territory as to the citizens of the United States and those of any other States that may be admitted into the Confederacy, without any tax, impost, or duty therefor.
Page 177 - It may not be unworthy of remark, that it is very unusual, even in cases of conquest, for the conqueror to do more than to displace the sovereign and assume dominion over the country. The modern usage of nations, which has become law, would be violated; that sense of justice and of right which is acknowledged and felt by the whole civilized world would be outraged, if private property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled.
Page 91 - The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated.
Page 552 - ... the decree of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded to...
Page 91 - The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation, and best calculated to promote their interests. The powers they conferred on this government were to be exercised by itself ; and the limitations on power, if expressed in general terms, are naturally, and, we think, necessarily, applicable to the government created by the instrument. They are limitations of power granted in the instrument itself ; not of distinct governments,...
Page 31 - In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary.
Page 155 - Within five years, an action upon a judgment or decree of any court of the United States, or of any state or territory within the United States. Within four years, an action upon any contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument of writing, except those mentioned in the preceding section.
Page 195 - THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the county of Washington.