What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action Affirmed agent agreement alleged allowed amount appellant appellant's appellee application authority Bank bill building cause charge Chicago Circuit Court City claim complainant condition Conkey contended contract counsel County damages decree deed defendant delivered the opinion direct duty entered entitled error evidence executed fact farm feet filed fire follows further give given Heard held injury instruction interest issued John Judge judgment jury JUSTICE land March matter ment mortgage motion negligence notice objection October opinion Opinion filed paid parties payment person plaintiff plaintiff in error possession presiding proof purchase question railroad reason received record recover refused remanded result Reversed rule secured statute street suit sustained taken tending term testified testimony thereof tion track train trial verdict witnesses
Page 615 - When parties have deliberately put their engagements into writing, in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking was reduced to writing...
Page 394 - If a bankrupt shall have given a preference within four months before the filing of a petition, or after the filing of the petition and before the adjudication, and the person receiving it, or to be benefited thereby, or his agent acting therein, shall have had reasonable cause to believe that it was intended thereby to give a preference, it shall be voidable by the trustee, and he may recover the property or its value from such person.
Page 508 - ... unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof...
Page 546 - States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, and each of us, our heirs, successors, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
Page 462 - It has been repeatedly held that, if one maliciously interferes in a contract between two parties, and induces one of them to break that contract to the injury of the other, the party injured can maintain an action against the wrongdoer.
Page 181 - You are further instructed that you are the sole judges of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given to their testimony.
Page 395 - Obtaining additional security, or receiving payment of a debt, under such circumstances, is not prohibited by the law. Receiving payment is put in the same category, in the section referred to, as receiving security. Hundreds of men constantly continue to make payments up to the very eve of their failure, which it would be very unjust and disastrous to set aside. And yet this could be done in a large proportion of cases if mere grounds of suspicion of their solvency were sufficient for the purpose.
Page 395 - It is not enough that a creditor has some cause to suspect the insolvency of his debtor; but he must have such a knowledge of facts as to induce a reasonable belief of his debtor's insolvency, in order to invalidate a security taken for his debt. To make mere suspicion a ground of nullity in such a case would render the business transactions of the community altogether too insecure. It was never the intention of the framers of the act to establish any [23 C.2d 444] such rule.
Page 605 - Now, in this class of cases, on what does the jurisdiction of the court depend? It seems to us that the seizure of the property, or that which, in this case, is the same in effect, — the levy of the writ of attachment on it, — is the one essential requisite to jurisdiction, as it unquestionably is in proceedings purely in rem. Without this the court can proceed no further. With it, the court can proceed to subject that property to the demand of plaintiff.