Norridgwock Phillips 3811069 370 1496 98 755 &c. 50 271 Palmyra 114 578 1131) 119; 114 228 439 409 1712 1703 9351800 1226 85 67 128 305 330 1856 1256 346 414 255 48 751 88 224 178 504 1399 126 191 149 27 16 55 106 108 75 276 519 52 34 Parkman 30 100 100 20 8 48 129 163 620 347 188 327 20 30 40 416 216 Ripley 22 122 80 261 19 55 111 127 440 264 122 80 St. Albans 24 104 47 19 12 36 97 116 16 100 18! 60 114 97 643 397 71 131 346 251|1135 1002 53 150 334 291 1620 759 681|1385 9 51 78 109 994 102 25 10 103 28 13 292 14 485 286 118 35 66 106 821 125 79 Sebasticook and No. 5, 2nd range No. 2, 1st range, w. of Kenneb. R. Dutton 50 166 17 48 17 17 Dover 24 93 48 18 12 Dexter 160 411 232 44 25 Eddington 106 323 15 270 33 44 68 12 233 224 Howland Maxfield } 86 73 10 TOWNS. It has been observed that the enumerated articles in the preceding tables do not comprise the whole products of the land employed in tillage. That part which is employed in horticulture, and in the field culture of potatoes and other roots for the food of man or beast, (which includes a considerable proportion of the tillage of all farmers, and of some a large part) flax, and other articles, should be deducted from the number of acres returned, if we would ascertain their productiveness from the quantity of enumerated articles exhibited in the reHow great deduction should be made on this account, must be only conjectural, but it is believed that it will be found not less than a fourth part, and on this principle is founded the estimate of products per acre in table 3. turns. |