Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism

Front Cover
Matt Young, Taner Edis
Rutgers University Press, 2004 - Religion - 238 pages

Is Darwinian evolution established fact, or a dogma ready to be overtaken by "intelligent design"? This is the debate raging in courtrooms and classrooms across the country.

Why Intelligent Design Fails assembles a team of physicists, biologists, computer scientists, mathematicians, and archaeologists to examine intelligent design from a scientific perspective. They consistently find grandiose claims without merit.

Contributors take intelligent design's two most famous claims--irreducible complexity and information-based arguments--and show that neither challenges Darwinian evolution. They also discuss thermodynamics and self-organization; the ways human design is actually identified in fields such as forensic archaeology; how research in machine intelligence indicates that intelligence itself is the product of chance and necessity; and cosmological fine-tuning arguments.

Intelligent design turns out to be a scientific mistake, but a mistake whose details highlight the amazing power of Darwinian thinking and the wonders of a complex world without design.

 

Contents

I
1
II
9
III
20
IV
32
V
48
VI
58
VII
72
VIII
85
XI
139
XV
153
XVI
172
XVII
185
XVIII
197
XIX
207
XX
223
XXI
227

IX
107
X
121

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page iv - It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.

Bibliographic information