Reports of Cases Decided in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States Within the Southern District of Ohio ; Humphrey H. Leavitt, Judge, Volume 1R. Clarke, 1872 - Law reports, digests, etc Omits certain cases related to the Fugitive Slave Act and the Civil War. Cf. Preface. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
Page 28
... plaintiff as his assignee , has surrendered or abandoned the invention to the public , there can be no recovery for an infringement . If the jury find the patented improvement is new and original , and that the defendant has infringed ...
... plaintiff as his assignee , has surrendered or abandoned the invention to the public , there can be no recovery for an infringement . If the jury find the patented improvement is new and original , and that the defendant has infringed ...
Page 29
... plaintiff . C. D. Coffin , for defendant . CHARGE OF THE COURT : This suit is brought to recover damages for an alleged infringement of the exclusive right of the plaintiff to make and vend the improved wash - board , patented to Orin ...
... plaintiff . C. D. Coffin , for defendant . CHARGE OF THE COURT : This suit is brought to recover damages for an alleged infringement of the exclusive right of the plaintiff to make and vend the improved wash - board , patented to Orin ...
Page 37
... plaintiff can not recover . The evidence on this point is briefly this : That , owing to doubts as to the validity of the patent , a number of persons in Cincinnati were en- gaged in the manufacture of wash - boards on the plan of ...
... plaintiff can not recover . The evidence on this point is briefly this : That , owing to doubts as to the validity of the patent , a number of persons in Cincinnati were en- gaged in the manufacture of wash - boards on the plan of ...
Page 38
... plaintiff offered to prove the aggregate of profit made by all the manufacturers of the improved wash - board in violation of his exclusive right , insisting that the de- fendant was liable for a pro rata share of this entire profit ...
... plaintiff offered to prove the aggregate of profit made by all the manufacturers of the improved wash - board in violation of his exclusive right , insisting that the de- fendant was liable for a pro rata share of this entire profit ...
Page 82
... plaintiff consists of a deed from William Wells and wife to Robertson and Rippert , dated May 1 , 1847 , and a deed from Rippert to the plaintiff , dated April 8 , 1851. As both parties claim under Wells , there is no controversy as to ...
... plaintiff consists of a deed from William Wells and wife to Robertson and Rippert , dated May 1 , 1847 , and a deed from Rippert to the plaintiff , dated April 8 , 1851. As both parties claim under Wells , there is no controversy as to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action alleged amount application Arleth assignment authority avers barge Bicknell bill cargo charge Cincinnati CIRCUIT COURT claim collision complainant conclusion consideration construction contract counsel creditors Cuba Curtis damages debtor decree defendant demurrer descending boat Dick Keyes District duty entitled evidence facts filed flour Fort Wayne fraud Fremont Gaylord Goody Friends granted ground habeas corpus Hamilton county improvement infringement injunction injury insisted insolvent invention judge judgment Judson jurisdiction jury Kentucky land Landis larboard letters patent liable libellants lien machine maritime lien marshal ment motion navigation notice Ohio Ohio river opinion Orleans owners paid parties patent payment persons pilot plaintiff principle prior proof proper proved purchase purpose question referred replevin river salvage says South Bend specification statute Steamboat suit Supreme Court sureties sustained territory testimony tion Todd Town of Wellsville United valve wash-boards witnesses writ of habeas Yorktown
Popular passages
Page 30 - In the patent office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using It, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which It appertains, or with which It is most nearly connected, to make, construct compound, and use the same...
Page 568 - In order to justify a resort to revolutionary resistance, the federal government must be guilty of "a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise" of powers not granted by the Constitution.
Page 427 - It is not enough that there is a remedy at law. It must be plain and adequate, or, In other words, as practical and efficient to the ends of justice and its prompt administration as the remedy in equity.
Page 613 - If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States...
Page 317 - ... have a right to claim as new; if the error has, or shall have arisen by inadvertency, accident, or mistake, and without any fraudulent or deceptive intention...
Page 561 - If any one proposition could command the universal assent of mankind, we might expect it would be this : that the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action.
Page 611 - On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors.
Page 200 - And that either of the justices of the Supreme Court, as well as judges of the District Courts, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus, for the purpose of an inquiry into the cause of commitment.
Page 561 - The constitution of the United States was ordained and established, not by the states in their sovereign capacities, but, emphatically, as the preamble of the constitution declares, by " the people of the United States." There can be no doubt that it was competent to the people to invest the general government with all the powers which they might deem proper and necessary, to extend or restrain these powers according to their own good pleasure, and to give them a paramount and supreme authority.
Page 318 - And the patent so reissued, together with the corrected description and specification, shall have the same effect and operation in law, on the trial of all actions hereafter commenced for causes subsequently accruing, as though the same had been originally filed in such corrected form, before the issuing of the original patent.