Page images
PDF
EPUB

restraint of liberty by force or other obstacle or necessity; hence, imprisonment.87

86

1

CONFIRM.88 To make firm or certain;89 to make firmer;90 to give new assurance of truth or certainty;91 to put past doubt;92 to settle or establish; 93 to render valid or binding by approval and acceptance; to strengthen, sanction, or ratify;95 to ratify what has been done without authority or insufficiently.96 The word " 'confirm" apparently carries with it the idea of the recognition of a

physician finding in the deceased a
prolapsed uterus in which there was
a dead foetus. It was held that it
was not shown that the deceased
member died as "the result of any
confinement due to pregnancy."
." Rose
v. Commonwealth Ben. Assoc., 27
Del. 144, 147, 86 A 673 (where the
court said: "There was no child-
birth or lying-in for the delivery of
a child, or even a foetus. There was,
it is testified, a dead fœtus in the
uterus and a condition of septic
poisoning, and the member died. This
is the whole story").

86. Century D. 87. Century D.

[blocks in formation]

above-stated case," meant that the jury found in favor of plaintiff against defendant the same amount as had been found by the justice. Humphrey v. Johnson, 143 Ga. 703, 85 SE 830.

96. Black L. D. [quot Capps v. Hensley, 23 Okl. 311, 317, 100 P 515]. 97. Capps v. Hensley, 23 Okl. 311, 317, 100 P 515.

a telegraph company in transmitting | sion, "confirm the judgment in the
a message, the court said: "A fail-
ure of defendant's operators to con-
firm the message could not be con-
sidered as a circumstance on the
question of gross negligence. Plain-
tiffs contracted and paid for the
sending of an unrepeated message.
The defendant was not under obliga-
tion to repeat or confirm the mes-
sage (i. e., 'to make certain or sure,
give new assurances of truth or cer-
tainty to, put past doubt, verify;
confirmation supplies all defects,
though that which had been done was
not valid at the beginning')." Weld
v. Postal Tel.-Cable Co., 210 N. Y.
59, 76, 103 NE 957.

[ocr errors]

90. Larned v. Larned, 98 Kan. 328, 333, 158 P 3.

91. Webster D. [quot Boggs v.
Merced Min. Co., 14 Cal. 279, 306].
92. Webster D. [quot Boggs V.
Merced Min. Co., 14 Cal. 279, 306].
93. Century D.

[a] "Establish" as synonymous.-
In an action involving the following
sentence, "The relation of husband
and wife amongst persons of color is
established," contained in "an act to
establish and regulate the domestic
relations of persons of color," etc.,
the court said "The word 'establish,'
as thus used, may be interpreted to
signify 'recognized, acknowledged,
ratified and confirmed.' Such signi-
fication of the word is supported not
only by judicial construction
but by common use and in the best
authorities. A printed example cited
occurs in two verses of the English
translation of the Mosaic law con-
cerning a married woman's Vow.
'Every vow and every binding oath,
to afflict the soul, her husband may
it void.' But if her husband alto-
gether 'hold his peace at her from
day to day, then he establish all
her vows or all her bonds which are
upon her; he confirmeth them, be-
cause he held his peace at her in the
day that he heard them.'-Numbers,
Chap. XXX, verses 13 and 14.
the latter verse the words 'establish'
and 'confirm' are used to translate
one and the same word in the Greek
and in the Hebrew." Davenport v.
Caldwell, 10 S. C. 317, 332, 339.
94. Standard D.

[a] As implying actual confinement in jail.-(1) Where one was arrested on a capias ad respondendum, and received permission from plaintiff in the suit and the sheriff to go at large, being merely directed to attend occasionally at court, it was held that this was not such confinement as was intended by an act for the relief of insolvent debtors, extending the benefits of it to all persons "now in confinement for debt," etc., as a confinement in gaol was intended by the act. In re Brush, 6 N. J. L. 404. (2) Where in a proceeding for bastardy the statutes provided for the commitment to jail of the person charged, on failure of procuring recognizance, and for his discharge on being confined six months, it was held that confinement did not mean free and promiscuous going at large outside the jail after being committed, but confinement within the jail. State v. Lamoine, 53 Vt. 568, 573 (where the court said: "If the party sees fit not to abide in confinement, and by permission of the jailor goes at large ad libitum be-establish it or her husband may make cause he prefers to, all that need be said is, he will fail of qualifying himself for the interposition of the jail commissioners"). (3) Where a circuit judge was authorized to institute an inquiry into the sanity of any person in confinement under an indictment or on other than civil processes, it was held that the words "in confinement" were used to import those who were imprisoned in the county jail awaiting a final trial, or in the actual custody of the officers of the law as distinguished from those not having been arrested, or, being arrested, had been discharged from arrest on bail. Ex p. Trice, 53 Ala. 546, 548 (where the court said: "It is true that a man's bail are looked upon as his jailers of his own choosing, and for some purpose he is esteemed to be in their custody, and in the prison of the court. This, however, is rather a legal fiction, indulged to secure to the bail the ample right by law to detain the principal, and to surrender in discharge of their recognizance or obligation").

See also Confine ante p 422. [b] Confinement on the streets. A sentence on conviction of violating a city ordinance, directing confinement on the streets, means that defendant be confined at labor on the streets. Shuler v. Willis, 126 Ga. 73, 75, 54 SE 965.

In

[a] Confirmation of orders for expenditures.-In construing a provision in an act that no order made by justices in pursuance of certain powers which should require the expenditure or payment of any money should be of force until confirmed by the council of the city or borough, the court said that it was of opinion that the word "confirm" was used in the seise of approve. Reg. v. York, 1 E. & B. 588, 594, 72 ECL 588, 118 Reprint 558.

95. Larned v. Larned, 98 Kan. 328, 333, 158 P 3.

[a] Judgment confirmed.-Where, in a suit in a justice's court, the justice entered on the docket a judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant for the principal, interest, attorney's fees and costs, stated in detail, from which an appeal was taken to a jury in that court, and the jury returned a verdict stating, "We, the jury, confirm the judgment in the above-stated case, and costs of this appeal, also ten per cent. attorney's fees," dated and signed by the foreman, such verdict was not so uncer[a] Repeat or confirm messages- tain as to be void. Giving to it a In an action involving the liability of reasonable intendment, the expres

88. See also Confirmation post p 424.

"Afirm" synonymous see Affirm 2 C. J. p 380.

89. Webster D. [quot Boggs v. Merced Min. Co., 14 Cal. 279, 306].

98. Reg v. York, 1 E. & B. 588, 594, 72 ECL 588, 118 Reprint_558. 99. Reg. v. York, 1 E. & B. 588, 594, 72 ECL 588, 118 Reprint 558.

1. McLeod v. McNab, [1891] A. C. 471, 474, 476 (where, in construing a statute providing that "no will or codicil shall be revived otherwise than by a codicil executed in manner herein before required, and shewing an intention to revive the same," the court said that it was of opinion that the word "confirm" is an apt word, and expresses the meaning, and has the operation of the word "revive," which is used in the statute).

2. [a] "Affirmed" as synonymous. -In construing the Bankruptcy Act § 57n, in which adjudication is defined as the date of the entry of

a

decree that the defendant in a bankruptcy proceeding is a bankrupt, or if such decree is appealed from, then the date when such decree is finally confirmed, the word "confirmed" was construed as not being confined to a technical affirmance, but as being broad enough to include the termination of an appeal from a bankruptcy adjudication by dismissal. In re Lee, 171 Fed. 266, 268. See also Hughes v. Boyle, 5 Ont. 395, 398 (where, although the court stated that "affirm" and "confirm" were synonyms, it also said: "Taking the word 'affirmed' in its ordinary natural meaning, it is clear that the judgment appealed from has been by the discontinuance and ending of the appeal confirmed, established, made certain, and free from doubt. It is again to be noted that the affirmance is not said to be by the Court, or rule or order thereof. It seems to me no other conclusion than one fixing the sureties with liability for these costs will effectuate the Intention of the parties").

3. Century D.

Confirmed drunkenness as ground for divorce see Divorce [14 Cyc 623]. 4. Century D.

[a] "Shall be ratified and confirmed" as importing futurity.-In construing the terms of a treaty of 1819, by which Spain ceded Florida to the United States, the court said: "The treaty was drawn up in the Spanish as well as in the English language. Both are originals, and were unquestionably intended by the parties to be identical." The Spanish has been translated, and we now understand that the article as expressed in that language, is, that the grants "'shall remain ratified and confirmed' to the persons in possession" of them, to the same extent, etc., thus conforming exactly to the universally received doctrine of the law of nations. "If the English and the Spanish parts can, without violence, be made to agree, that construction which establishes this conformity ought to prevail. If, as we think must be admitted, the security of. private property was intended by the parties; if this security would have been complete without the article, the United States could have

equivalent of "approved," and it is said that it is a word, the natural meaning of which is more than "endorsed" or "verified."

CONFIRMARE EST ID FIRMUM FACERE QUOD PRIUS INFIRMUM FUIT.'

CONFIRMARE NEMO POTEST PRIUS QUAM JUS EI ACCIDERIT.8

CONFIRMATIO. The conveyance of an estate, or the communication of a right that one hath in or unto lands or tenements, to another that hath the possession thereof, or some other estate therein, whereby a voidable estate is made sure and unavoidable, or whereby a particular estate is increased or enlarged.

CONFIRMATIO CHARTARUM. Confirmation of charters.9 9/2

CONFIRMATIO CRESCENS. An enlarging confirmation; one which enlarges a rightful estate.10 CONFIRMATIO DIMINUENS. A diminishing

Νο

no motive for insisting on the inter- | position of the government in order to give validity to the titles which, according to the usages of the civilized world, were already valid. violence is done to the language of the treaty by a construction which conforms the English and Spanish to each other. Although the words properly the words of contract, stipulating for some future legislative act; they are not necessarily So. They may import that they shall be ratified and confirmed' by the force of the instrument itself. When we observe that in the counterpart of the same treaty, executed at the same time by the same parties, they are used in this sense, we think the construction proper, if not unavoidable." Viterbo v. Friedlander, 120 U. S. 707, 726, 7 SCt 962, 30 L. ed. 776 [quot U. S. V. Percheman, 7 Pet. (U. S.) 51, 89, 8 L. ed. 604].

'shall be ratified and confirmed' are

5. Reg. v. York, 1 E. & B. 588, 596, 72 ECL 588, 118 Reprint 558.

[a] Confirmation of swamp land selections.In an action involving the confirmation of swamp land selections, the court said: "The act did not prescribe for the Secretary any mode or agencies for making out his list for transmission. The plan adopted has been so long in public use in the land departments of the Federal and State governments, and has been So often alluded to in legislation, that the laws of the State cannot well be construed without taking judicial cognizance of the system. The selections have been, in fact, made by agents of the State, sent to the Secretary of the Interior, through the Commissioner of the General Land Office, approved and returned to the Governor. these When lists, SO approved, have been transmitted to the Governor, they have been treated in our legislative and official acts confirmed, and so we must understand the word." Hendry v. Willis, 33 Ark. 833, 836 [quot in part Chism v. Price, 54 Ark. 251, 260, 15 SW 883, 1031].

as

6. Reg. v. York, 1 E. & B. 588, 596, 72 ECL 588, 118 Reprint 558. 7. A maxim meaning "To confirm is to make firm that which was before infirm." Black L. D. [cit Coke Litt. 295].

8. A maxim meaning "No one can confirm before the right accrues to him." Black L. D. [cit Lampet's Case, 10 Coke 46b, 47b, 48a, 77 Reprint 994, where it is said: "It is put in 13 E. 1. tit. Confirm. 24, as a maxim, if a man quit claims his right before the right falls to him, the quit claim is void"].

9. Black L. D. [cit 2 Blackstone Comm. 325; Sheppard Touchst. 325]. 912. Black L. D.

[a]

A statute of 25 Edw. I,

confirmation; a confirmation which tends and serves to diminish and abridge the services whereby a tenant doth hold, operating as a release of part of the services.1

CONFIRMATIO EST NULLA UBI DONUM PRÆCEDENS EST INVALIDUM.12

CONFIRMATIO EST POSSESSIONIS JURE DEFECTIVE PER EOS QUORUM JUS EST RATHABITIO.13

CONFIRMATION.14 Making firm what was before infirm;15 a deed or act whereby that which is voidable is made sure and valid;16 a contract by which an act that was voidable is made firm and unavoidable;17 the approbation or assent to an estate already created, which, as far as the confirmer's power, makes it good and valid;18 a conveyance of an estate or right in esse, whereby a voidable estate is made sure and unavoidable, or a particular estate is increased.19 To make sure a Receiver see Receivers [34 Cyc

whereby the Great Charter is declared to be allowed as the common law; all judgments contrary to it are declared void; copies of it are ordered to be sent to all cathedral churches and read twice a year to the people; and sentence of excommunication is directed to be as constantly denounced against all those that, by word or deed or counsel, act contrary thereto or in any degree Black L. infringe it. D. [cit 1 Blackstone Comm. 128]. 10. Black L. D. [cit Sheppard Touchst. 311].

11. Black L. D. [cit Sheppard

Touchst. 311].

12. A maxim meaning "Confirmation is void where the preceding gift is invalid." Black L. D. [cit Gibons v. Marltiward, Moore K. B. 594, 72 Reprint 780; Coke Litt. 295].

13. A maxim meaning "The confirmation of a possession defective in law is a ratification by means of those whose right it is." Morgan Leg. Max.

14. Confirmation: Of: Account of:

Executor or administrator see Executors and Administrators [18 Cyc 1186]. Guardian see Guardian and Ward [21 Cyc 164]. Receiver see Receivers [34 457]. Trustee see Trusts [39 Cyc 502]. Appointment of:

Cyc

Municipal officer see Municipal
Corporations [28 Cyc 407].
Officer generally see Officers [29
Cyc 1372].

Assessment for public improvement see Municipal Corporations [28 Cyc 1176].

Bid at partition sale see Partition [30 Cyc 282]. Composition in bankruptcy see Bankruptcy § 595. Grant

of public land see Public Lands [32 Cyc 1209]. Judicial sale see Judicial Sales [24 Cyc 33].

Partition sale see Partition [30 Cyc 282].

Report of:

Commissioners in condemnation proceedings see Eminent Domain [15 Cyc 904].

see

Commissioners in partition
Partition [30 Cyc 266, 278].
Master in chancery see Equity [16
Cyc 459].
Referee

see References [34 Cyc

869]. Viewers of private road see Private Roads [32 Cyc 376]. Sale by: Executor under testamentary power see Powers [31 Cyc 1134]. Guardian see Guardian and Ward [21 Cyc 136].

321].

[blocks in formation]

"Approval" synonymous see Approval 4 C. J. p 1461 note 77 [b].

15. Anderson L. D. [quot Scales v. Johnson, (Tex. Civ. A.) 41 SW 828, 830].

[a] Illustration.-The words "fully ratified and confirmed" in an instruhave been construed as curing dement signed by husband and wife fects in a conveyance executed by the husband. Scales V. Johnson, (Tex. Civ. A.) 41 SW 828, 830.

16. Patten V. New York El. R. Co., 3 AbbNCas (N. Y.) 306, 328 (where the court also said: "If the previous act were void, it can operate only as the creation of a new right or estate").

[a] Defects supplied.-"Confirmation supplies all defects, though that which had been was not valid at the beginning." Weld v. Postal Tel.Cable Co., 210 N. Y. 59. 76, 103 NE 957. 17. Barr v. Schroeder, 32 Cal. 609, 617.

[a] Illegal contracts.-An illegal contract cannot be made good by confirmation. De Hereu v. Hereu, 6 Ariz. 270, 283, 56 P 871.

18. Gilbert Tenures 75 [quot Boquillas Land, etc., Co. v. Curtis, 213 U. S. 339, 344, 29 SCt 493, 53 L. ed. 822; Fauntleroy v. Dunn, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 594, 608]. To same effect Peo. v. Law, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 494, 511, 22 How Pr 109, 126 [quot Larned v. Larned, 98 Kan. 328, 333, 158 P 3]. 19. Coke Litt. 295b [quot Knight

22

21

voidable estate is the proper office of confirmation.20 The confirmation does not therefore regularly create an estate,2 yet such words may be mingled in the confirmation, as may create and enlarge an estate; but that is by force of such words that are foreign to the business of confirmation, and by their own force and power tend to create the estate.23 There must be a precedent rightful or wrongful estate in the person to whom the confirmation is made in his own or another's right, or at least he must have the possession of the thing whereof the confirmation is made, as a foundation for the confirmation to work upon.24 A confirmation necessarily supposes a knowledge of the thing ratified,25 the term implying a deliberate act intended to renew and ratify a transaction known to be voidable.26 Although primarily confirmation applies to that by which what was before voidable is made valid, as where one makes valid a voidable contract of his own, which he might have repudiated,27 the two terms "ratification" and "confirmation" are often used interchangeably as synonymous." Recognition,29 and adoption, have also been used indifferently as

30

28

v. Dyer, 57 Me, 174, 177, 99 Am D 765; Turk v. Skiles, 45 W. Va. 82, 84, 30 SE 234].

[a] Similar definitions.-(1) "The conveyance of an estate, or right, that one hath in or unto lands or tenements, to another that hath the possession thereof, or some estate therein, whereby a voidable estate is made sure and unavoidable, or whereby a particular estate is increased and enlarged." Sheppard Touchst. 311 [quot Langdeau V. Hanes, 21 Wall. (U. S.) 521, 530, 22 L. ed. 606; De Mares v. Gilpin, 15 Colo. 76, 81, 24 P 568]. (2) "A confirmation is a conveyance of an estate or right in lands to one who has the possession or some estate therein." Morrow V. Whitney, 95 U. S. 551, 554, 24 L. ed. 456. (3) "A deed, whereby a conditional or voidable estate is made absolute and unavoidable by the confirmer, so far as he is able, or whereby a particular estate is increased." Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Majors, 5 Mont. 111, 138, 2 P 322 [Blackstone Comm. 325; cit Coke Litt. 295b].

[b] Species of conveyance.-A confirmation is a species of commonlaw conveyance. Conveyance is the generic term of which confirmation

is the species. Northern Pac. R. Co. V. Majors, 5 Mont. 111, 138, 2 P 322.

or

[c] "A legislative confirmation (1) of a claim to land is a recognition of the validity of such claim, and operates as effectually as a grant or quit-claim from the government.' Langdeau v. Hanes, 21 Wall. (U. S.) 521, 530, 22 L. ed. 606 [quot De Mares v. Gilpin, 15 Colo. 76, 81, 24 P 568]. (2) "If the claim be to land with defined boundaries, capable of identification, the legislative confirmation perfects the title to the particular tract, and a subsequent patent is only documentary evidence of that title. If the claim be to quantity, and not to a specific tract capable of identification, a segregation by survey will be quired, and the confirmation will then immediately attach the title to the land segregated." Langdeau v. Hanes, 21 Wall. (U. S.) 521, 530, 22 L. ed. 606.

re

20. Turk v. Skiles, 45 W. Va. 82, 84, 30 SE 234.

21. Gilbert Tenures [quot Boquillas Land, etc., Co. v. Curtis, 213 U. S. 339, 344, 29 SCt 493, 53 L. ed. 822; Fauntleroy v. Dunn, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 594, 608]. To same effect Peo.

[blocks in formation]

v. Law, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 494, 511,
22 How Pr 109, 126.

22. Gilbert Tenures 75 [quot Bo-
quillas Land, etc., Co. v. Curtis, 213
U. S. 339, 344, 29 SCt 493, 53 L. ed.
822]. To same effect Peo. v. Law,
34 Barb. (N. Y.) 494, 511, 22 How Pr
109.

23. Gilbert Tenures 69 [quot Peo. v. Law, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 494, 512, 22 HowPr 109].

24. Northern Pac. R. Co. V. Majors, 5 Mont. 111, 139, 2 P 322 [quot Smith Real & Pers. Prop. 561; Sheppard Touchst. 312].

25. Russell v. Erie R. Co., 70 N. J. L. 808, 816, 59 A 150, 67 LRA 433, 1 AnnCas 672; Adair v. Brimmer, 74 N. Y. 539, 554.

[a] Knowledge of defects and right to reject or ratify.-"Confirmation and ratification imply to legal minds knowledge of a defect in the act to be confirmed, and of the right to reject or ratify it." Adair v. Brimmer, 74 N. Y. 539. 554 [quot Fidelity Trust Co. v. Butler, 91 SW 676, 681, 28 KyL 1268].

26. 2 Pomeroy Eq. Jur. § 965 [quot Wagg v. Herbert, 19 Okl. 525, 565, 92 P 250]; De Hereu v. Hereu, 6 Ariz. 270, 283, 56 P 871. To same effect Barr V. Schroeder, 32 Cal. 609, 617.

27. Seiffert, etc., Lumber Co. v. Hartwell, 94 Iowa 576, 580, 63 NW 333, 58 AmSR 413.

28. Byrne V. Doughty, 13

Ga.

46, 52; Seiffert, etc., Lumber Co. v.
Hartwell, 94 Iowa 576, 580, 63 NW
333, 58 AmSR 413; Capps v. Hensley,
23 Okl. 311, 317, 100 P 515 (where
the court said: "Ratification and con-
firmation appear to be considered as
almost, if not quite, synonymous").
29. Byrne v. Doughty, 13 Ga. 46,
Byrne v. Doughty, 13 Ga. 46,

52.

30.
52.
31.
Turk v. Skiles, 45 W. Va. 82,
84, 30 SE 234.
32. Black L. D. [cit 25 Hen. VIII
c 20].
33.

meaning "Confir

[blocks in formation]

[a] Confiscable personal estate."All things come within the description of confiscable personal estate, which a man has in his own right, whether they be in action or possession." Camp v. Lockwood, i Dall. (Pa.) 393, 403, 1 L. ed. 192.

40. [a] Origin of term.-The verb "confiscate" is derived from the Latin "con," with, and "fiscus," a basket or hamper, in which the emperor's treasure was formerly kept. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. (U. S.) 199, 234, 1 L. ed. 568. 41.

an

In re Barnett, [1902] 1 Ch. 847, 858, 3 BRC 198. [a] Illustrations.-In action which involved the construction of a statute as to inheritance, the court said: "The words with which it commences, 'If the spouse is no longer alive,' must be read in connection with the immediately preceding article, which gives the whole. inheritance to the spouse in certain contingencies there mentioned. Those words, 'If the spouse is no longer alive,' are equivalent to 'if there be no person to claim as heir,' and in that event 'the succession is confiscated as heirless property.' The great difficulty in the case is in dealing with the poverty of language, or at any rate of the English language. 'Confiscated' is a word capable of being used in many sensés. In the ordinary sense it applies where the Crown intervenes, not to take property because it is vacant, but to take by way of penalty in exercise of sovereign rights different from those which are asserted in a case like this. But here the word does not mean confiscated' in the sense of taking by way of penalty. It is taken, or assumed by the State, as its own property." In re Barnett, [1902] 1 Ch. 847, 858, 3 BRC 198.

42. Skelly v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. A. 156, 164, 165, 161 SW 877 [cit Cyc]; Wade v. Hylton, 3 Dall. (Pa.) 199, 234, 1 L. ed. 568. [a] Bona confiscata (confiscated

mation supplies all defects, though goods), as they are called by the

maxim
A
that which had been done was not
Black L. D.
valid at the beginning."
[cit Coke Litt. 295b].

[blocks in formation]

civilians, because they belong to the fiscus or imperial treasury; or, as our lawyers interpret them, forisfacta; that is, such whereof the property is gone away or departed from the owner. The true reason and only substantial ground of any forfeiture for crimes consist in this: that all property is derived from society, being one of those civil

property to the prince or state."

43

CONFISCATION.“ The act of confiscating; .45 or of condemning and adjudging to the public treasury; the act of the sovereign against a rebellious subject.*7 In international law, where a state seizes property belonging to another state, or to its subjects, and appropriates it;48 a punishment for carrying contraband of war, or for attempting to carry supplies to a place besieged or blockaded.49 Confiscation is either an act of penal justice for the punishment of great crimes against the state or the exercise of a belligerent right against the property of public enemies;50 not the arbitrary seizure of the property of one person,

rights which are conferred on individuals, in exchange for that degree of natural freedom which every man must sacrifice when he enters into social communities. If therefore a member of any national community violates the fundamental contract of his association, by transgressing the municipal law, he forfeits his right to such privileges as he claims by that contract; and the state may very justly resume that portion of property, or any part of it, which the laws have before assigned him. 1 Blackstone Comm. 299.

43. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. (U. S.) 199, 234, 1 L. ed. 568; Skelly v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. A. 156, 164, 165, 161 SW 877 [cit Cyc].

[a] "Forfeit" as synonymous.The term was formerly used as synonymous with "forfeit," but at present the distinction between the two terms is well marked. Confiscation supervenes on forfeiture. The person, by his act, forfeits his property; the state thereupon appropriates it, that is, confiscates it. Hence, to confiscate property implies that it has first been forfeited; but to forfeit property does not necessarily imply that it will be confiscated. Black L. D.

44. Confiscation: As deprivation of property without due process of law see Constitutional Law [8 Cyc 1097]. Of enemy's property see War [40

Cyc 332].

[a] "Condemnation" distinguished. "Confiscation is the act of the sovereign against a rebellious subject. Condemnation as prize is the act of a belligerent against another belligerent. Confiscation may be effected by such means, either summary or arbitrary, as the sovereign, expressing its will through lawful channels, may please to adopt. Condemnation as prize can only be made in accordance with principles of law recognized in the common jurisprudence of the world. Both are proceedings in rem, but confiscation recognizes the title of the original owner to the property which is to be forfeited, while in prize the tenure of the property seized is qualified, provisional, and destitute of absolute ownership." Winchester

v. U. S., 14 Ct. Cl. 13, 48. 45. Black L. D. [a] Act done on the part of the government.-"Confiscation must be an act done in some way on the part of the government of the country where it takes place, and in way beneficial to that government; though the proceeds may not, strictly speaking, be brought into its treasury." Levin v. Allnutt, 15 East 267, 269, 104 Reprint 845.

some

46. Black L. D.

[blocks in formation]

be

[a] Collection of taxes. If the mere taking of property into the public treasury constituted confiscation, all collection of taxes might be considered as being embraced by the term. The word, however, is not commonly used in that sense. Although the taking of property, because a thing taken is required for public use, may sometimes called confiscation, the word cannot be properly applied to the taking of property by the government to provide for the general wants, or protection of the public, and the support of the institutions of society. It ought not to be applied to a legitimate exercise of the powers of taxation. State v. Sargent, 12 Mo. A. 228, 234.

47. Winchester v. U. S., 14 Ct. Cl. 13, 48; Skelly v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. A. 156, 164, 161 SW 877.

48.

49.

50. 5,484.

Sweet L. D.

Sweet L. D.

The Globe, 10 F. Cas. No.

51. The Globe, 10 F. Cas. No. 5,484; Skelly v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. A. 156, 164, 161 SW 877.

52. Read v. Read, 5 Call (9 Va.) 160, 208 [cit 3 Coke Inst. 227]. See also Sweet L. D. (where it is said: "Forfeiture as a punishment for smuggling, etc., is sometimes called confiscation").

53. Read v. Read, 5 Call (9 Va.) 160, 208.

54. Standard D.

as

[a] Other terms distinguished.— When a railroad carrier invokes a judicial review of rates imposed by the public utilities commission provided by Gen. St. (1909) 7228 and L. (1911) c 238 § 21, the words "unreasonable, unjust, oppressive and unlawful" are not synonymous with "confiscatory," and should be given their fair and reasonable import according to the usages of courts of equity. Union Pac. R. Co. v. Public Utilities Commn., 95 Kan. 604, 605, 148 P 667.

[b] Confiscatory orders of railroad commission.-"Confiscatory orders are ordinarily, but not always, unlawful or unreasonable. In order to be fairly termed confiscatory the order must deprive the railroad of a fair return upon the value of its property, not merely reduce former rates or charges." Minneapolis, etc., R. Co. v. State R. Commn., 136 Wis. 146, 167, 116 NW 905, 17 LRANS 821. See also Carriers §§ 624-692, 746-823.

[c] Rates.-Where

a

legislative

act fixes rates to be charged by public service corporations, such laws and rights are said to be con

such

fiscatory when they compel corporations to serve the public without any or an inadequate compensation, and thus in effect transfer property from private to public use. Skelly v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. A. 156, 164, 161 SW 877. 55. Black L. D. 56. Standard D. Conflict of laws Laws post p 427.

see Conflict of

[a] Conflict in emblems.-There is no "conflict in emblems" at a primary election, within the Election Law § 57, so as to authorize determination thereof by an election officer, and summary review by the supreme court, where a political "party" is merely using on its primary ballots the emblem of an "independent body," which by its definition (Cons. L. [1909] c 17 § 2 as amended by L. [1911] c 649) nominates by petition only, and so takes no part in primary elections. Schieffelin v. Britt, 150 App. Div. 568, 570, 135 NYS 62, 63.

[b] Conflict with provisions of statute-In construing N. J. L. Revision p 763 § 53, defining those who shall constitute the family entitled to the benefit of § 52, providing for the setting apart of certain property to the family of a deceased person out of his estate, to be the widow and child or children who shall reside in the family of the decedent at his death, and adding that nothing in § 52 shall be permitted to "conflict" with the provisions of any last will, the court said: "I at first thought that perhaps, in interpreting the provisions of the fifty-third section, the word 'conflict,' taken in its sense of violent active collision, should induce the holding that the will must expressly override the bounty of the fifty-second section, but after having regard to the whole statute I conceive the better opinion to be that such was not the legislative intent. I conclude that if the will disposes of the whole estate the bounty is lost, the word 'conflict' meaning that the will shall be supreme where the complete execution of its provisions does not admit, expressly or impliedly, of the bestowal of the bounty." Carey v. Monroe, 54 N. J. Eq. 632, 637, 35 A

[blocks in formation]

For later cases, developments and changes in the law see cumulative Annotations, same title, page and note number.

CONFLICT OF LAWS

BY DONALD J. KISER *

[Matters not in this Title, treated elsewhere in this Work, see Cross References

infra p 428]

[blocks in formation]

1. In General [§ 10] p 437

2. Nonpenal Statutory Rights and Liabilities [§ 11] p 438

3. Penal Statutes [§ 12] p 438

4. Civil-Law Rights and Liabilities [§ 13] p 438

5. Positive Law as Preventing Exercise of Comity [§ 14] p 438

6. Public Policy as Preventing Recognition of Foreign Law [§§ 15-16] p 439
a. In General [§ 15] p 439

b. Meaning of "Settled Public Policy" [§ 16] p 439

7. Injury to State or Citizens as Preventing Exercise of Comity [§ 17] p 440

8. Intrinsic Difference between Systems of Law [§ 18] p 440

9. Nonconformity to Precedent and Absence of Reports [§ 19] p 441

10. Foreign Law Denying Extraterritorial Action [§ 20] p 441

11. Inchoate Rights [§ 21] p 441

IV. RECIPROCITY [§ 22] p 441

V. EXTRATERRITORIALITY [§§ 23-24] p 442

A. Definition and Scope [§ 23] p 442

B. Extraterritorial Domicile [§ 24] p 443

VI. ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN RULES AS TO CONFLICT OF LAWS [§ 25] p 445
VII. LAWS WHICH MAY GOVERN [§§ 26-40] p 446

A. In General [§ 26] p 446

B. Lex Fori [§ 27] p 447

C. Lex Domicilii [§ 28] p 447

D. Lex Loci Contractus [§§ 29-34] p 448

1. In General [§ 29] p 448

2. Place of Making; Locus Celebrationis [$ 30] p 449
3. Place of Performance; Locus Solutionis [§ 31] p 450

4. Stipulations as to Governing Law [§ 32] p 451

5. Contracts with Foreign Corporation [§ 33] p 451

6. Applications of Rules [§ 34] p 451

E. Lex Loci Delictus [§§ 35-39] p 452

1. Torts [§§ 35-38] p 452

a. In General [§ 35] p 452

b. Statutory Causes of Action [§ 36] p 453

c. Maritime Torts [§ 37] p 454

d. Defenses [§ 38] p 455

2. Crimes [39] p 456

F. Lex Loci Rei Sita [§ 40] p 456

VIII. STATUS [§§ 41-49] p 457

A. Definition [§ 41] p 457

B. General Rules [§ 42] p 457

*Author of "Compromise and Settlement" ante p 312, "Workmen's Compensation Acts" C. J. Editor of "Landlord and Tenant" 24 Cyc 845. Joint author of "Chattel Mortgages" 11 C. J. 387, "Indictments and Informations" 22 Cyc 157, "Joinder and Splitting of Actions" 23 Cyc 376.

For later cases, developments and changes in the law see cumulative Annotations, same title, page and note number.

« PreviousContinue »