« PreviousContinue »
OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Const. Cour,
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION,
COMMENCED AT HARRISBURG, MAY 2, 1838
Reported by JOHN AGG, Stenographer to the Convention :
ASSISTED BY MESSRS. WHEELER, KINGMAN, DRAKE, AND MÄKINLEY.
PRINTED BY PACKER, BARRETT, AND PARKE.
PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES
CONVENTION HELD AT PHILADELPHIA.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 27, 1837.
Mr. Bedford, of Luzerne, moved that the convention do now proceed to the second reading and consideration of the resolution, offered by him on the 26th instant, in the words following, viz:
Resolved, That the following new rule be adopted, both in convention, and in commiitee of the whole, viz:
“ That when any twenty delegates rise in their places, and move the question on any pending amendment, it shall be the duty of the presiding officer to take the vote of the body on sustaining such call, and if such call shall be sustained by a majority, the coch tion shall be taken on the amendment without further debate.”
The question being put, the motion was agreed to. Mr. Bedford said he had offered this resolution for the purpose of accelerating the business of the convention. We have now adopted a resolution fixing the period for an adjournment, sine die, and it becomes important to adopt some measure to expedite the business before us. now six weeks sir.ce there has been a single voie taken in the committee of the whole on any of the articles. The committee to whom the seventh article was referred, reported no amendment to the section now under discussion. An amendment was offered, and an amendment was offered to that amendment: and although both had been fully discussed, and every one's mind was made up, still the majority, being in favor of neither the one proposition or the other, could not get the previous question: attempts had been made to do so without effect. If the call for the previous ques. tion were sustained, the amendments would be cut off, and then the original constitution would stand; and this prevented a majority from sustaising the call for the previous question. Thus this debate had been continued for a considerable time without the possibility of cutting it short. believed such a change in the rules as he now proposed to be absolutely necessary to be carried into effect, before the convention could be able in adjourn sine die. The resolution was offered before the resolution to
adjourn was adopted ; and he believed it to be more necessary now.
Mr. Dickey, of Beaver, expressed regret, that he should have to disappoint the gentleman from Luzerne. The rule which the gentleman bad introduced was one entirely new, and unknown to legislation. If genilemen had not wished to consume the time of the convention, shey ought not to have offered amendments, which they knew would not be adopted, and which would be withdrawn. The previous question was a sufficient check, whenever the sense of the house was in favor of sus. taining it. He did not know whether the previous question would be considered a privileged question, if this were adopted All the objects which it is desirable to accomplish, can be accomplished by the previous question. The gentleman from Luzerne would not like to vote for the previous question, because he was in favor of the len dollar note sys. tem, and the previous question would cut that off. He believed, however, that the previous question was quite sufficient, and he was therefore opposed to this resolution.
Mr. DarlinGTON, of Chester, asked if the adoption of this rule would not lead to the interruption of a speaker, in the midst of his speech?
Mr. BEDFORD replied, that such was not his intention, and he believed that such would not be the effect of the adoption of the resolution.
Mr. MEREDITH, of Philadelphia, said, that we had already adopted so many new rules, that no one could tell what the rules of orier are. He did not know however, whether it would not be necessary to adopt some such provisions, to enable us to adjourn on the second day of February ; because, from the course pursued yesterday, it appears, that, although sent here for the purpose of deliberation, we are to be a body deciding the most important questions without debate. Every one who wishes to deliver his views, is to be limited to one hour. We must resort to some mode of sitting out every question in the best mode we can. He moved to postpone the further consideration of this resolution for the present, in order that we may see how the other rules operate. He afterwards withdrew the motion.
Mr. INGERSOLL, of Philadelphia, said, he understood there were three gentlemen, who had in their power to move a reconsideration of the vote