Page images
PDF
EPUB

21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.

22 But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.

23 And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to

made the petition; meaning that they
made it through their mother. This re-
quest Grotius naturally conjectures arose
out of the promise just made to the apos-
tles, of sitting on twelve thrones; and it
may be added, that as the imagery in that
passage is taken from the Sanhedrim, the
request had the same reference; for on
the right hand of the Nase, or president
of the sanhedrim, sat the Ab Bethdin or
father of the court, and on the left the
Hacam or sage.
There was nothing
therefore in the request of the sons of
Zebedee inconsistent, in their view, with
the general promise that the twelve apos-
tles should sit upon twelve thrones; but
they desired the two most elevated places,
the two offices under Christ of the great-
est dignity. The request proceeded from
a criminal ambition.

Verse 22. Ye know not what ye ask.This not only reproves the request itself, but intimates that they were ignorant of the true nature of his kingdom, where the highest cminence was that of the severest labours and the most painful sufferings. Christ himself obtained not his crown by wars and victories, but by shame and death.

To drink of my cup.-It was anciently the custom, at great entertainments, for the governor of the feast to appoint to each of his guests the kind and proportion of wine which they were to drink, and to assign to every one his cup. Hence, both in sacred and profane writers the cup is metaphorically used for the portion of good or evil that befals men in life;

U

but is more frequently used to express an evil or afflictive lot. The allusion in some passages appears to be to the empoisoned cup given to malefactors. "Behold, they whose judgment was not to drink of the cup have assuredly drunken; and art thou he that shall altogether go unpunished? Thou shalt not go unpunished, but thou shalt surely drink of it." (Jer. xlix. 12.) "O Jerusalem, which hast drunk at the hand of the Lord the cup of his fury, thou hast drunken the dregs of the cup of trembling, and wrung them out." (Isaiah li. 17.)

Baptized with the baptism, &c.—The being immersed and overwhelmed with waters is a frequent metaphor, in all languages, to express the rush of successive troubles. This repetition of the same term is not peculiar to the Hebrew style, but is found also in the ancient Greek writers. Griesbach leaves out this clause respecting baptism from his text; but it is found in the greater number of мss, and not only coincides with the context, but is found in the parallel place, Mark x. 38, where he retains it.

We are able.-How rashly this was said appeared from the sequel, when they all forsook him and fled.

Verse 23. Ye shall indeed drink, &c.Both were to endure afflictions for the truth's sake, and thus to drink of the same cup and be baptized with the same baptism, though in a lower measure; for the sufferings of Christ were in themselves, as in their design, peculiar to himself. They drank of the same cup, but he

give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.

24 And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren.

e

25 But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.

e Luke xx. 25.

drained its bitterness. James, the brother of John, was put to death by Herod ; and John, besides the ordinary persecutions which he endured with his brethren, was banished into Patmos.

Is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. The words "it shall be given," are not in the Greek, and have been unhappily supplied by our translators, as though there had been an ellipsis. But ουκ εστιν εμον δουναι, αλλ' οις ητοίμασται υπο του παίρος μου, is to be rendered, is not mine to give, except to them for whom it is prepared by my Father; axxa, but, being used for en, except. Thus et un, in Matthew xvii. 8, is expressed by axxa in the parallel place, Mark ix. 8: "they saw no man,” ɑλλɑ, “save," except Jesus only. It is worthy remark, that in few of our English translations of the Bible, before that of king James, are there any supplied words. The Bishops' Bible has, "is not mine to give but to them for whom it is prepared of my Father." Thus the meaning is obvious; the passage neither states that the Son had no power to dispose of the honours of his own kingdom, nor that eternal glory is to be given only to the elect chosen by the Father in Christ, from the foundation of the world; but simply that Christ had no power, as Salome and her sons supposed, to grant the honours of his kingdom on the principle of favouritism, or from the interest which Salome might have in his regards from her assiduous attendance upon him, and ministering to him, or from the affection which might be thought to arise from the natural relationship between him and James and John, who are called the

brothers of our Lord; but that he administers all the affairs of his kingdom, and assigns its offices and rewards, in perfect conformity to the will and counsels of the Father. Betwixt the persons of the ever blessed Trinity there is a perfect consent, and the laws by which they will distribute the rewards of heaven are revealed. For it is to the final honours of eternity that our Lord must be considered as referring; since we know the fact, that no superiority of one or a few was established among the apostles on earth. But at his second coming he will reward every man according as his work shall be. The highest dignities are therefore prepared for those who are by holiness, zeal, and labour best prepared for them. Thus is both the favouritism of earthly attachments, which might be supposed to exist between our Lord and Salome and her sons, and that which is supposed to arise from an eternal election of persons to eternal glory, equally shut out. The rule of distribution is fixed he that by diligent "occupation" of his Lord's goods makes his five "pounds gain ten pounds," shall have 'authority over ten cities."

[ocr errors]

Verse 24. Were moved with indignation. -St. Mark says, "were much displeased," a strong emotion of anger having been excited in their minds; which our Lord calmly, and with impressive dignity, restrains, by calling them unto him, and teaching them all a lesson of the deepest wisdom as well as piety, and which, if observed, would banish all ambition and all contentions from among the disciples of Christ for ever.

Verse 25. Exercise dominion over them, &c.-This passage sufficiently shows that

26 But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;

27 And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your

servant :

66

[ocr errors]

Christ's "kingdom is not of this world;" that is, it is not conformed either in its SPIRIT, END, OF FORM, to the civil governments established among men. It does not, however, follow from these words, that his church is without government, or that it has not officers who are commissioned by him to bear rule. This conclusion would be contrary to his own act; for he gave thrones to his apostles, and appointed them to "judge," govern, preside over "the twelve tribes " of the spiritual Israel. See note chap. xix. 28. They too appointed presbyters or elders, to teach and enforce the laws of Christ in the church, to reprove the unruly," and to reject obstinate offenders from the communion of saints. The meaning must therefore be collected from the occasion; and as it is clear that the request of the sons of Zebedee arose out of the notion, more or less still retained by all the apostles, that the kingdom of Christ, however spiritual in some respects it might be, yet, nevertheless, was to be embodied in the form of a civil government over the Jewish nation, so that it should regain its independence, and be ranked again among the kingdoms of the world; our Lord's words oppose this earthly notion, by declaring that in his kingdom there should be no such dominion or authority as the princes and great men, the apxovles, and the μeyaλo, of the Gentiles, the splendour and power of whose governments they envied, exercised among their subjects. Those who take the compound verbs, xalaкkupieuw, and κατεξουσιαζω, to have more force than the same verbs in their simple form, suppose them to indicate the tyrannical and arbitrary power which the Gentile rulers usually exercised; but they do not seem to have considered that the fair inference from this would be, that the same KIND of dominion and authority might, for any

thing our Lord says to the contrary, be set up in the Christian church, provided it were not carried to the extent of severity; in other words, that the same kind of coercion and compulsion might be applied to spiritual matters as to those of civil life. But the fact is not only, that these verbs, in their compound form, are frequently used in no stronger sense than when simple; but that St. Luke, in the parallel place, Luke xxii. 25, uses them only in the simple form to express the very same thing, which is decisive of the question. It is not, therefore, merely the DEGREE but the KIND of dominion exercised by the princes of the Gentiles in their kingdoms, which our Lord excludes from his church. And when it is considered, that the government which Christ and his apostles have established in the church is wholly adapted to it as a spiritual society, and consists,—1. In direction; 2. In brotherly reproof when a fault has been committed; 3. In faithful but patient admonition when it is persisted in ; and, 4. In exclusion from the table of the Lord, the visible sign of communion, but with no infliction of civil disabilities or penalties ;-nothing is more different in kind than this species of government from that exercised in a civil community, and which in its mildest form must accomplish its ends by the threat or by the actual infliction of fines, imprisonments, or corporal chastisement. By virtue of this power operating upon the fears of men, civil rulers acquire authority, and effect the ends of the institution of civil

government. But it shall not be so among you; you are to obtain authority in the churches, and to effect the ends of their institution, by MORAL influence: whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister, diakovos, coadjutor or helper; and whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant, dovλos, or, as St. Mark

28 Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.

[ocr errors]

f Phil. ii. 7.

expresses it, servant of all." In this passage our Lord, according to the style frequently used by the Hebrews, expresses himself in parallelisms, where the second clause is exegetical of the preceding one, with which it corresponds, and expresses the idea with greater force.

Verse 28. Even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, &c.—NoπEр, in the same manner as, the Son of Man came not into the world to exercise power and dominion, to rule over men and to be served by them; but by laborious and unintermitted application, by "going about doing good," to serve and benefit them.

[ocr errors]

And to give his life a ransom for many.— The doctrine of the atonement, the great foundation and topstone of the Christian system, is here most clearly laid down. That which was given by Christ was his life, upon that great principle which runs through all the dispensations of revealed religion, that, without the shedding of blood, there is no remission that which man had forfeited by his sin was life; for the wages of sin is death;" and that which alone could free him from this penalty was the substitution of a NOBLER LIFE in place of his own, to which all the sacrifices of animal life under the patriarchal and Mosaic dispensations looked forward as instituted types. Christ is said to GIVE his life; which not only intimates that his sufferings and death were voluntarily undergone, but that he had a power over the disposal of his life which no merely human being is invested with. "I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it again," are words which no man but our Lord ever used; and they prove that his humanity was impersonated in a higher nature, possessing a sovereign authority, and having life and death at command. The precise nature of the act by which Christ, who might have prevented it, submitted to die, is expressed by the term Avтpov, a ransom, or price of redemp

[ocr errors]

tion, whet her from death, captivity, or any other state of misery. In the Septuagint it generally corresponds with the Hebrew 75, which signifies a piacular sacrifice; in which sense it, or some word derived from it, is constantly used in the New Testament with reference to the death of Christ. "In whom we have redemption, тην ажоXUтрWσw, through his blood." Eph. i. 7. Ye were not redeemed, AUT PWONTE, with corruptible things, as silver and gold; but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a LAMB without blemish and without spot." Thus, that deliverance of man from sin, misery, and all other consequences of his apostasy from God, which constitutes our redemption by Christ, is not granted without a consideration as an act of mere prerogative. The ransom, the redemption-price, was exacted and paid; one thing was given for another," the precious blood" of Christ, "as of a Lamb," that is to say sacrificially offered for captive and condemned men. In this manner, "he gave himself a ransom, avτiλuтpov, for all," so that there is no further satisfaction or price to be paid by any.

[ocr errors]

For many. Here a signifies not merely for the benefit of many, but in their stead, in their place, which is the strong and original sense of this preposition, as in the following passages:-2 Sam. xviii. 33, "Would to God I had died, a σov, for thee," in thy stead. "Archelaus did reign in Judea, art, in the room of, his father Herod." "If he ask a fish, will he, avτ, for a fish, in place or instead of a fish, give him a serpent?" But because TоXX is here used without the article, it has been argued, that the sense is, that Christ gave his life a ransom instead of many ransoms, that is, instead of the numerous and frequently repeated oblations of the Mosaic law. But however true it is, that the one sacrifice of Christ took the place of the many typi cal sacrifices previously instituted, this

g

29 And as they departed from Jericho, a great multitude followed him.

30 And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou son of David.

31 And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace: but they cried the more, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou son of David.

g Mark x. 46; Luke xviii. 35.

important doctrine is no where expressed
in such terms as occur in the text, which
by a Jew accustomed to sacrificial phrases
would be understood to enunciate the
unmeaning proposition, that the death of
Christ was a price paid to redeem the
sacrifices of the law! Besides, in the
sense of abolishing the Mosaic sacrifices,
the words are broken off from the scope
and intent of the passage, which is to
show that Christ not only came to minis-
ter to others, but to do even more than
this for others, namely, to give his life for
them. Nor is there any weight in the
argument from the absence of the article;
still
persons, not things, are intended, as
in chap. xxvi. 28, "This is my blood of
the new covenant, which is shed for
many, we оwv, for the remission of
sins."

"Christ was once offered to bear the sins, wow, of many," Hebrews ix. 28. Some, however, who admit, that the text signifies that the Son of man gave his life a ransom for many persons, deny that Too, without the article, is equivalent to martes, all, though they acknowledge that of TOAλo has that import; whilst others again contend, that neither with nor without the article is it to be taken in that extensive sense. In answer to the first it may be observed, that the text before us, and 1 Tim. ii. 6, are in their sense strictly correspondent, and that, in the latter, the apostle declares, that Christ “ gave himself, αντιλυτρον υπερ TTV, a ransom for all," thereby showing that he understood Toxλo, as used by the evangelist, to be fully equivalent to παντες In like manner, in the Septuagint version of Daniel xii. 2, TOλλ with

out the article is used for all mankind :

66

And many, Toxo, of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." With respect to those who deny that of Toλo ever signifies all mankind, it is sufficient to quote Romans v. 19: "For as by one man's disobedience many, ol Toxλol, were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many, o Toxλ, be made righteous.” The text, therefore, not only expressly lays down the doctrine of the atonement, but extends its intent and design to all mankind.

[ocr errors]

Verse 29. And as they departed from Jericho.-St. Mark says, "As he went out from Jericho;" but St. Luke, according to our translation, As he was coine nigh to Jericho." This apparent discrepancy altogether arises from a wrong rendering of ev tw eyview, which ought to be translated indefinitely, while he was near, that is, before he had gone far from the city.

[ocr errors]

Verse 30. Two blind men. The evangelists Mark and Luke mention but one, whom the former calls, Bartimæus, the son of Timæus ;" and, as the name is particularly mentioned, we may conclude that, either from his family, or some other circumstance, he was a well-known character, which may account for his case only being noticed. He was also, probably, the speaker both for himself and companion.

Verse 31. And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace. -This is both an awkward and an obscure rendering. Επετίμησεν αυτοις ought

« PreviousContinue »