Panama Canal Treaties (United States Senate Debate), 1977-78: February 27 thru March 16, 1978 |
Contents
| 2019 | |
| 2025 | |
| 2027 | |
| 2035 | |
| 2067 | |
| 2137 | |
| 2141 | |
| 2166 | |
| 3264 | |
| 3270 | |
| 3283 | |
| 3292 | |
| 3299 | |
| 3307 | |
| 3313 | |
| 3327 | |
| 2193 | |
| 2197 | |
| 2250 | |
| 2294 | |
| 2393 | |
| 2402 | |
| 2412 | |
| 2414 | |
| 2552 | |
| 2572 | |
| 2619 | |
| 2625 | |
| 2795 | |
| 2807 | |
| 2851 | |
| 2885 | |
| 2946 | |
| 2949 | |
| 2967 | |
| 2977 | |
| 2995 | |
| 3005 | |
| 3055 | |
| 3056 | |
| 3073 | |
| 3096 | |
| 3102 | |
| 3137 | |
| 3160 | |
| 3207 | |
| 3241 | |
| 3242 | |
| 3256 | |
| 3335 | |
| 3338 | |
| 3357 | |
| 3360 | |
| 3366 | |
| 3375 | |
| 3378 | |
| 3384 | |
| 3390 | |
| 3400 | |
| 3452 | |
| 3465 | |
| 3476 | |
| 3477 | |
| 3490 | |
| 3491 | |
| 3492 | |
| 3547 | |
| 3557 | |
| 3560 | |
| 3590 | |
| 3606 | |
| 3607 | |
| 3645 | |
| 3730 | |
| 3768 | |
| 3805 | |
| 3858 | |
| 3891 | |
| 3892 | |
| 3897 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration agree agreement allegations ALLEN American ask unanimous consent BAYH believe BYRD Canal Zone colleague Colombia concerned Congress cost CURTIS debate defend the canal defense deleted distinguished Senator documents DOLE drug trafficking economic fact floor give going GOLDWATER GRAVEL GRIFFIN HATCH Hay-Pauncefote Treaty Idaho intelligence interests issue Isthmus LAXALT leadership amendments LEAHY legislation Linowitz matter ment military Monroe Doctrine MUSKIE narcotics negotiations Neutrality Treaty Omar Torrijos operation Panama Canal Treaty Panama Canal Zone Panamanian Panamanian Government percent permanently neutral plebiscite present PRESIDING OFFICER proposed treaties question ratification Republic of Panama revenues ROBERT SARBANES Senator from Alabama Senator from Indiana Senator from Kansas Senator from Maryland Senator from Utah Senator yield Senator's ships sovereign sovereignty staff statement talking territory thank the Senator tion tolls transit the canal U.S. Senate understand United vessels vote
Popular passages
Page 2590 - Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.
Page 2590 - No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. The foregoing principle prohibits not only armed force but also any other form of interference or attempted threat against the personality of the State or against its political, economic and cultural elements.
Page 2546 - Our policy, in regard to Europe, which was adopted at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter of the globe, nevertheless, remains the same ; which is, not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers...
Page 2016 - Under the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal...
Page 2025 - The Republic of Panama further grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation and control...
Page 2031 - II which the United States would possess and exercise if it were the sovereign of the territory within which said lands and waters are located to the entire exclusion of the exercise by the Republic of Panama of any such sovereign rights, power or authority.
Page 2025 - The Republic of Panama grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation and control of a zone of land and land under water for the construction, maintenance, operation, sanitation and protection...
Page 2468 - Mr. President, I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
Page 2023 - Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes...
Page 2538 - To urge the member states to take those steps that they may consider appropriate for their individual and collective self-defense, and to cooperate, as may be necessary or desirable, to strengthen their capacity to counteract threats or acts of aggression, subversion, or other dangers to peace and security resulting from the continued intervention in this hemisphere of Sino-Soviet powers, in accordance with the obligations established in treaties and agreements such as the Charter of the Organization...