BISHOP, Appellant, v. BISHOP, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 cost and printing disbursements. In re BRUNSWICK MANUF'G Co., (Mortgagees, Appellants; Receiver, Respondent.) (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and MAYHAM, JJ. No opinion. Order modified by striking out the word "directed," and by requiring undertaking of $1,000 to secure costs. In re CITY OF AMSTERDAM. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and MAYHAM, JJ. No opinion. Order amended: 1. By affirming appraisement of damages. 2. By stating that the reversal of that part of the special term order which sent the matter back to commissioners was made on the ground that the statute in question did not provide for notice to the parties to be assessed, and was therefore illegal. For former report, see ante, 234. JARRARD v. BISSELL et al. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and MAYHAM, JJ. No opinion. Motion to go the court of appeals denied. For former report, see ante, 92. MORRISON, Appellant, v. MAXWELL et al., Respondents. In re PARTRIDGE. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements. PEOPLE ex rel. HEALEY, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Disbursements allowed on settlement of order. PEOPLE ex rel. STAPLETON, Respondent, v. Bell et al., Appellants. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Stay of proceedings vacated. LANDON, J., dissenting. For former reports, see 7 N. Y. Supp. 701; ante, 254. RICHMOND, Respondent, v. DIEFENDORF, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Judgment aflirmed on former decision. see 4 N. Y. Supp. 375. For former report, TABOR, Respondent, v. HUMPHREY, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements. FISH, J., not acting. THOMPSON v. FULLER. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and MAYHAM, JJ. No opinion. Motion to modify order denied. For former report, see ante, 62. TYRIELL v. York. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. February 24, 1890.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and MAYHAM, JJ. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied. In re VOWER'S WILL. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. December 11, 1889.) Argued before LEARNED, P. J., and LANDON and FISH, JJ. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs against residuary legatee. BAUDER v. Lipe. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to set aside the attachment granted, with $10 costs. Held, that the limitation in section 638 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies. See Blossom v. Estes, 84 N. Y. 614. FORSYTHE v. CUYLER. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. HUNTER v. COOPERSTOWN & S. V. R. Co. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889. Motion granted and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. PEOPLE v. HILL. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order amended so as to show that the reversal was granted upon questions of law exclusively. For former report, see 3 N. Y. Supp. 564. POMEROY v. LOOMIS. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) Order reversed, and taxation set aside, without costs of this appeal to party. Per Curiam mem. filed with the clerk of Broome county. ROWLAND . Town of Davenport. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In re SANFORD. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) PER CURIAM. Order of confirmation reversed so far as it relates to the mental capacity of the lunatic prior to the date of the inquest, and the finding on that subject contained in the inquisition stricken out as unwarranted, under section 2335 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and in other respects order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. SCHUMAKER v. MATHER. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) Judgment and order reversed, on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. SLATTERY v. NEW YORK, L. E. & W. R. Co. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Motion denied. For former report, see 4 N. Y. Supp. 910. STEBBINS V. VILLAGE OF ONEIDA. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Motion denied. For former report, see 5 N. Y. Supp. 483. SWAN . BALTIMORE & O. R. Co. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order striking out portions of the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. SWAN v. BALTIMORE & O. R. Co. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. MERWIN, J., not sitting. WELCH v. CITY OF ELMIRA. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. WERNER v. TUCH. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. September 19, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Following Grow v. Garlock, 29 Hun, 598. For former report, see 5 N. Y. Supp. 219. BALLOU, Respondent, v. CARTON et al., Appellants. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied. For former report, see ante, 15. BARDEEN, Respondent, v. ALLEN, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. BARNEY, Appellant, v. FULLER et al., Respondents. BLAKESLEE, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order reversed, and attachment amended so that it shall stand for the debt of $167.54, and costs, and motion in other respects denied. BUTLER, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSWEGO et al., Respondents. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. For former report, see ante, 114. CALLAGHAN, Respondent, v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. For former report, see 5 N. Y. Supp. 285. CHAPMAN, Respondent, v. GLEASON, impleaded with LYNCH, Appellant. COBB, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11,1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order reversed, and attachment amended so that it shall stand for the debt of $420 only and costs; and the motion in other respects denied, without costs. COLE, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order reversed, with printing disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. CONE, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order reversed, with printing disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. HOOSE, Appellant, . ALEXANDER, Respondent. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order reversed, with printing disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. HUMPHRIES, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order modified, so as to allow the attachment to be amended so that it may stand for $116.85 debt and costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party of the appeal. MITCHELL, Respondent, v. KNAPP, impleaded, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department. February 11, 1890.) Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ. No opinion. Order settled, and filed with the clerk of Oneida county. MARTIN, J., not sitting. For former report, see ante, 40. |