him credit for being become a good Chriftian-Were we convinced, în fact, of the moral right of a public fatirift's running a muck at all he meets; we much doubt of the moral efficacy of his chaftifement; being of the poet's noble interlocutor's opinion. "How fweetly Fancy, with her painted Train, Does Does MARS will from cenfure fhield his FAVOURITE SON, Or fair Devonia quit th' enchanting Ton Even our Satirist is horridly pofed to reply. He can produce no public proof; but then Soame Jenyns, Efq.-An odd plea, it must be confeffed; when our Saviour himself fays, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to go to heaven." Rev. The Terrier's Barkings.] The fignature of a great many fucceffive Letters which appeared, fome time ago, in a Morning Paper, and were remarkable for their fevere reprehenfions of this noble Lord. "Bwho fears the lafhes yet to come, But how does our pact know this? Has he it from B-- Beftrews on the poet's brain? Nay, not an individual of even the more timid fex is pretended to have been reformed by our author's fatire; but then he comforts himself that they will reform in time. "The modish Fair may, for a while, defy The voice of Truth, or call it Calumny; But eager Time will haften to destroy Each changeful fabric of unreal joy. Time, on the Mufes' wings, fhall quickly bear Shall make her blush through Folly's vain difguife, There is no doubt that Time will, on his own wings, with out the aid of the Mufes, bring mortifications enow, to put a gadding young female in mind of the propriety of ftaying more at home. If the objects of our author's fatire are, thus, to be only cured by Time, we may bid him lay down his pen, as the Madman bid the General fheathe his fword. Why 66 fhould you rifk your life, faid he, against thofe foolish fellows? Let them alone, and in time they will die of themfelves." If our poetical Malayan, however, will needs go on bis own way (for, talk as finely as we will, by honour and appetite, as the valet fays, we muft all eat), we beg leave to recommend to him a little more time and care in tagging, trimming, and polifhing his lines. Doth not the lat, of the two following, fcandalize the firft? "Should Satire, by its bold and nervous line, How bald and enervate, inftead of bold and nervous, is this keing out glorious to three fyllables!-Why did not the line ren thus Aid and fupport fo glorious a defign.' Defy is no rhine to Calumny-Eye to Hypocrify-Toil to Smile Bear to Ear: of which, or fimilar, defective rhimes we meet with examples in almoft every page. When our fatirift imitates, or turns plagiary, alfo, for hea ven's fake! let him not rob the ipittle. "Tell "Tell me, my Lord, if this celeftial fenfe, Can there be a more obvious and fhameful plagiarifm? Who can doubt that these lines were taken from the following? Tell us, good folks, if that, in this here place, R. An Address to the London and Monthly Reviewers, on their Canvass of their Examination of Dr. Maclaine's Anjaver to Saame Fenyns, Efq. on his View of the Internal Evidence of the Chriftian Religion. By the Rev. Edward Fleet, Jun...B. A. of Oriel College, Oxford. 8vo. 6d. Brown. And can Mr. Edward Fleet, jun. of Oriel College, Oxford, be really a batchelor of arts and in holy orders! Can he have paffed his examination in the Schools, and obtained ordination in the Church? If fo it be, may we not, with propriety exclaim on his fituation, as doth the poet on that of the flies and grubs, we fometimes meet with, in amber? The things we know are neither choice nor rare, The Monthly Reviewers, it feems, in fpeaking of this Examiner's pamphlet, faid, "they would willingly give an account of it, if they underfood the language or reafoning." And for this wicked infinuation he does abute them, as, to be fure, they deferve, moft abominably. For our part we unfortunately went farther, and gave proof of deficiency both in ftile and argument; and, for this, we and our editor come in for our fhare. Dr. K. whom Mr. F. calls the principal manufacturer of the London Review, he tells us, has as weakly as unJuccessfully attacked Mr. Jenyns's writings, and therefore it is no wonder that any writer in favour of him fhould be loaded, with all the malevolent abufe that difappointed envy can inyent; fo that prejudice is plainly proved."-But what if Dr. K. had no hand at all in the bafinefs!-Let not Mr. Fleet's difcreet heart think that the principal manufacturer in the London Review is employed in fcriticifing fuch paltry pro productions as his Examination. But, if he had been fo employed, we know little of Dr. K. if he have not, hike Mr. Fleet, too good an opinion of his own abilities to envy thofe of others. That the arguments, in his Review of Mr. J's tract, might feem weak to Mr. F. is not at all to be wondered at, as he appears by no means qualified to understand them. They were of a kind, not calculated for the ignorantlyadmiring many, but for the judiciously-approving few: fome of whom would moft probably have controverted them, had they been controvertible. Mr. F. did not prefume to attempt it fo that Dr. K's attack, as it is here called, on Mr. J. had all the fuccefs the affailant expected; and no confequent prejudice against any writer in favour of Mr. J. could fubfift. We would, indeed, endeavour, if poffible, to fet Mr. Fleet here a little right. He talks of being himself a writer in favour of Mr. Jenyns. What value Mr. J. may fet upon his favour we know not; but we cannot regard, the fuffrage of fo frivolous an advocate as in any degree favourable to him*. We look upon it, indeed, as the greateft difparagement to that gentleman's performance, that its numerous admirers are fuch fuperficial reafoners and half-taught fcholars as our Addreffer. His great caufe of offence, however, with us, feems to be, our not having faid enough of his book. He would have had us retail his whole pamphlet; for, fays he, " even granting that a metaphorical impropriety may be in a fentence, does it follow, that every other part of the book muft contain it?" -Contain it! Contain what? The fentence, or the metaphorical impropriety? Or is either to be repeated in every part of the book?-Mafter Fleet calls us fools, and would have us take fhame to ourselves; but, to reply in his own ftrain, we cry, Shame upon him-Shame upon the heads of the College that made fuch a blockhead a batchelor ;-and fhame upon the Bishop that ordained fuch a dunce a deacon. We cannot in cominon charity suppose this pert junior as yet a priest. It is truly laughable to hear Mr. Fleet, placing himself fide by fide with Mr. Jenyns, complain of the malevolence exerted against them. W. The Defolation of America: a Poem. 4to. 1s. 6d. Kearfly. A nervous defcription and pathetic lamentation of the horrours of war in America. That the fcenes defcribed are truly, even peculiarly, lamentable, we with forrow confefs; but we cannot altogether impute them, as doth the poet, to the wilful wickedness of Great Britain; or think the regular troops of Europe more cruel and ferocious than the half-difciplined provincials of America. But fiction, not truth, is the province of a Poet: we wish there were lefs truth, than there probably is, in the imagined defolation, here described. We, yet, by no means recognize the features of Britons, in the butchers of the Americans, defcribed, in the beginning of the poem. "THROUGH the dim fhades by frantic terror led, From scenes of blood a hoary parent fled; A tender virgin breathlefs with her fears, Hung on his arm, and bath'd him with her tears: There paus'd awhile their fteps, while each furvey' Their |