 The question arises who are fellow servants in contemplation of law ? To constitute such they need not at the time be engaged in the same particular work. It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Page 258by Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, James M. Reasoner, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper - 1916Full view - About this book
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 808 pages
...this and other courts, in relation to fellow-servants, in which, broadly stated, it is said: " It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same...performing duties and services for the same general purposes. The rule is the same, though the one injured may be inferior in grade, and is subject to... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1865 - 722 pages
...or particular work. It is Slattery's Adm'r and Others v. The Toledo and Wabash Railroad. enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes,... | |
 | Law - 1888 - 556 pages
...fellow-servants, the employees need not be at the same time engaged in the same particular work. It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same...in the same common work, and performing duties and servive* for the same general purpose. The rule is the same, although the one injured may be inferior... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - Law reports, digests, etc - 1873 - 780 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules seem to have been laid down with care, after due consideration,... | |
 | Francis Wharton - Negligence - 1874 - 960 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules Łeem to have been laid down with care after due consideration,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1874 - 738 pages
...injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1876 - 854 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the Injury should be at the time engaged in tha same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...common work and performing duties and services for tha same general purposes, the master is not liable. " But CHURCH, C. J ., in delivering the opinion... | |
 | William Wait - Actions and defenses - 1878 - 1004 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. JLaning v. New York Central R. R. Co., 49 NY (4 Sick.) 521, 528... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1122 pages
...same operation or particular work. It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are In the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 1120 pages
...operation or particular work ; that It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes ; or, in... | |
| |
