 | Maryland. Court of Appeals, Richard W. Gill, John Johnson, Richard Wordsworth Gill - Law reports, digests, etc - 1840 - 578 pages
...bearing upon Negro Pegsy vs. Wilson. — 1837. the merits of this case, we have come to the conclusion, that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and that the same ought to be affirmed. The act of 1796, ch. 67, sec. 1, contains a general prohibition against... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, George Shall Yerger - Law reports, digests, etc - 1836 - 640 pages
...have been within the statute of Frauds, as was the case of Nichol vs. Lytle. Upon the whole, we think there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and order that it be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. PARTEE vs. CAUGHRAN, An eiecutordt ion tort cannot retain... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, Return Jonathan Meigs - Law reports, digests, etc - 1839 - 720 pages
...set up an outstanding title in a third person to defeat the recovery of such purchaser. We therefore are of opinion that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and direct that it be affirmed. TURNER vs. LUMBRICK. PLEADllTO. Parties — tenants in common. One tenant... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court, François-Xavier Martin - Law reports, digests, etc - 1839 - 814 pages
...title to the land which he had sold to the appellant, before the institution of the present suit; we are of opinion, that there is no error in the judgment of the district court. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed, with... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court, Benjamin Faneuil Porter - Law reports, digests, etc - 1840 - 816 pages
...Makute i£^Co. Townson vs. Moore. vs. Hathaway, 3 Stewart's R. 29, and Chapman vs. Arrington, ib. 480.) There is no error in the judgment of the court below, and it is affirmed. TOWNSON VS. MOORE. 1. It is no objection, since special demurrers have been dispensed... | |
 | West Hughes Humphreys, Tennessee. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1841 - 620 pages
...them as from the nature of the excavation required was practicable. We are therefore of the opinion that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and direct its affirmance. WIIAIAMS vs. WOODS. Williams bought of Woods land, paid a part of the purchase... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1844 - 800 pages
...does not bear out the last position of the opposite counsel. He then argued the following points: 1. That there is no error in the judgment of the court below, as rendered ; and if there be, it cannot be corrected or reversed here, in the form presented by the... | |
| |
We are of opinion, that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and that it ought to be affirmed. 
