which has scarcely any distinctively poetical quality or characteris-
tic about it except the rhyme. He has made some attempts in a
higher style, but with little success. His Pindaric Odes, written
and published when he was a young man, drew from Dryden (who
was his relation) the emphatic judgment, "Cousin Swift, you will
never be a poet": and, though Swift never forgave this frankness,
he seems to have felt that the prognostication was a sound one, for
he wrote no more Pindaric Odes. Nor indeed did he ever after-
wards attempt anything considerable in the
of serious poetry,
way
if we except his Cadenus and Vanessa (the story of Miss Van-
homrigh), his effusion entitled Poetry, a Rhapsody, and that on
his own death, and even these are chiefly distinguished from his
other productions by being longer and more elaborate, the most
elevated portions of the first-mentioned scarcely rising above nar-
rative and reflection, and whatever there is of more dignified or
solemn writing in the two others being largely intermixed with
comedy and satire in his usual easy ambling style. With all his
liveliness of fancy, he had no grandeur of imagination, as little
feeling of the purely graceful or beautiful, no capacity of tender
emotion, no sensibility to even the simplest forms of music. With
these deficiencies it was impossible that he should produce anything
that could be called poetical in a high sense. But of course he
could put his wit and fancy into the form of verse —
and so as to
make the measured expression and the rhyme give additional point
and piquancy to his strokes of satire and ludicrous narratives or
descriptions. Some of his lighter verses are as good as anything
of the kind in the language. As a specimen we will give one
which is less known than some others that might be quoted, one
of the many rattling volleys of rhyme by which he aided the
heavier artillery of his Drapier's Letters, a eulogy on Archbishop
King, who gained great applause by taking the popular side on
that occasion, under the title of An excellent New Song, upon his
Grace our Good Lord Archbishop of Dublin; By Honest Jo, one
of his Grace's Farmers in Fingal :

I sing not of the Drapier's praise, nor yet of William Wood,
But I sing of a famous lord, who seeks his country's good;
Lord William's grace of Dublin town, 'tis he that first appears,
Whose wisdom and whose piety do far exceed his years.1
In every council and debate he stands for what is right,

1 He was at this time seventy-four.

And still the truth he will maintain, whate'er he loses by 't.

And, though some think him in the wrong, yet still there comes a season
When every one turns round about, and owns his grace had reason.
His firmness to the public good, as one that knows it swore,
Has lost his grace for ten years past ten thousand pounds and more.
Then come the poor and strip him so, they leave him not a cross,
For he regards ten thousand pounds no more than Woods's dross.
To beg his favour is the way new favours still to win;

He makes no more to give ten pounds than I to give a pin.

Why, there's my landlord, now, the squire, who all in money wallows, He would not give a groat to save his father from the gallows.

O'tis a burning shame!

"A bishop," says the noble squire, “I hate the very name,
To have two thousand pounds a year
Two thousand pounds a year! Good lord! and I to have but five!"
And under him no tenant yet was ever known to thrive :
Now from his lordship's grace I hold a little piece of ground,
And all the rent I pay is scarce five shillings in the pound.
Then master steward takes my rent, and tells me, "Honest Jo,
Come, you must take a cup of sack or two before you go."
He bids me then to hold my tongue, and up the money locks,
For fear my lord should send it all into the poor man's box.
And once I was so bold to beg that I might see his grace,-
Good lord! I wonder how I dared to look him in the face:
Then down I went upon my knees his blessing to obtain ;
He gave it me, and ever since I find I thrive amain.

"Then," said my lord, "I'm very glad to see thee, honest friend;
I know the times are something hard, but hope they soon will mend:
Pray never press yourself for rent, but pay me when you can;

I find you bear a good report, and are an honest man."

Then said his lordship with a smile, "I must have lawful cash ;

I hope you will not pay my rent in that same Woods's trash."

"God bless your grace!" I then replied, "I'd see him hanging higher, Before I'd touch his filthy dross, than is Clandalkin spire.

To every farmer twice a week all round about the Yoke,

Our parsons read the Drapier's books, and make us honest folk."
And then I went to pay the squire, and in the way I found

His baillie driving all my cows into the parish pound:

"Why, sirrah," said the noble squire, "how dare you see my face?
Your rent is due almost a week, beside the days of grace."
And yet the land I from him hold is set so on the rack,

That only for the bishop's lease 'twould quickly break my back.
Then God preserve his lordship's grace, and make him live as long
As did Methusalem of old, and so I end my song.

POPE.

OF Swift's contemporaries, by far the most memorable name is that of Alexander Pope. If Swift was at the head of the prose writers of the early part of the-last century, Pope was as incontestably the first of the writers in verse of that day, with no other either equal or second to him. Born a few months before the Revolution, he came forth as a poet, by the publication of his Pastorals in Tonson's Miscellany in 1709, when he was yet only in his twenty-first year; and they had been written five years before. Nor were they the earliest of his performances; his Ode on Solitude, his verses upon Silence, his translations of the First Book of the Thebais and of Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon, and his much more remarkable paraphrases of Chaucer's January and May and the Prologue to the Wife of Bath's Tale, all preceded the composition of the Pastorals. His Essay on Criticism (written in 1709) was published in 1711; the Messiah the same year (in the Spectator); the Rape of the Lock in 1712; the Temple of Fame (written two years before) the same year; his Windsor Forest (which he had commenced at sixteen) in 1713; the first four books of his translation of the Iliad in 1715; his Epistle from Eloisa to Abelard (written some years before) we believe in 1717, when he published a collected edition of his poems; the remaining portions of the Iliad at different times, the last in 1720; his translation of the Odyssey (in concert with Fenton and Broome) in 1725; the first three books of the Dunciad in 1728; his Essay on Man in 1733 and 1734; his Imitations of Horace, various other satirical pieces, the Prologue and Epilogue to the Satires, his four epistles styled Moral Essays, and his modernized version of Donne's Satires between 1730 and 1740; and the fourth book of the Dunciad in 1742. Besides all this verse, collections of his Letters were published, first surreptitiously by Curl, and then by himself in 1737; and, among other publications in prose, his clever jeu d'esprit entitled a Narrative of the Frenzy of John Dennis appeared in 1713; his Preface to Shakspeare, with his edition of the works of that poet, in 1721; his Treatise of the Bathos, or Art of Sinking in Poetry, and his Memoirs of P. P., Clerk of This Parish (in ridicule of Burnet's History of his Own Time), in 1727. He died in May, 1744, about a year and a half before

his friend Swift, who, more than twenty years his senior, had naturally anticipated that he should be the first to depart, and that, as he cynically, and yet touchingly too, expressed it, while Arbuthnot grieved for him a day, and Gay a week, he should be lamented a whole month by "poor Pope," - whom, of all those he best knew, he seems to have the most loved.

Pope, with talent enough for anything, might deserve to be ranked among the most distinguished prose writers of his time, if he were not its greatest poet; but it is in the latter character that he falls to be noticed in the history of our literature. And what a broad and bright region would be cut off from our poetry if he had never lived! If we even confine ourselves to his own works, without regarding the numerous subsequent writers who have formed themselves upon him as an example and model, and may be said to constitute the school of which he was the founder, how rich an inheritance of brilliant and melodious fancies do we not owe to him! For what would any of us resign the Rape of the Lock, or the Epistle of Eloisa, or the Essay on Man, or the Moral Essays, or the Satires, or the Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot, or the Dunciad? That we have nothing in the same style in the language to be set beside or weighed against any one of these performances will probably be admitted by all; and, if we could say no more, this would be to assign to Pope a rank in our poetic literature which certainly not so many as half a dozen other names are entitled to share with his. Down to his own day at least, Chaucer, Spenser, Shakspeare, Milton, and Dryden pretensions to be placed before him or by his side. sary to dilate upon what has been sufficiently pointed out by all the critics, and is too obvious to be overlooked, the general resemblance of his poetry, in both its form and spirit, to that of Dryden rather than to that of our elder great writers. A remarkable external peculiarity of it is, that he is probably the only one of our modern poets of eminence who has written nothing in blank verse; while even in rhyme he has nearly confined himself to that one decasyllabic line upon which it would almost seem to have been his purpose to impress a new shape and character. He belongs to the classical school as opposed to the romantic, to that in which a French rather than to that in which an Italian inspiration may be detected. Whether this is to be attributed principally to his constitutional temperament and the native character of his imagination,

alone had any

It is unneces

or to the influences of the age in which he lived and wrote, we shall not stop to inquire. It is enough that such is the fact. But, though he may be regarded as in the main the pupil and legitimate successor of Dryden, the amount of what he learned or borrowed from that master was by no means so considerable as to prevent his manner from having a great deal in it that is distinctive and original. If Dryden has more impetuosity and a freer flow, Pope has far more delicacy, and, on fit occasions, far more tenderness and true passion. Dryden has written nothing in the same style with the Rape of the Lock on the one hand, or with the Epistle to Abelard and the Elegy on the Death of an Unfortunate Lady on the other. Indeed, these two styles may be said to have been both, in so far as the English tongue is concerned, invented by Pope. In what preceding writer had he an example of either? Nay, did either the French or the Italian language furnish him with anything to copy from nearly so brilliant and felicitous as his own performances? In the sharper or more severe species of satire, again, while in some things he is inferior to Dryden, in others he excels him. It must be admitted that Dryden's is the nobler, the more generous scorn; it is passionate, while Pope's is frequently only peevish: the one is vehement, the other venomous. But, although Pope does not wield the ponderous, fervid scourge with which his predecessor tears and mangles the luckless object of his indignation or derision, he knows how, with a lighter touch, to inflict a torture quite as maddening at the moment, and perhaps more difficult to heal. Neither has anything of the easy elegance, the simple natural grace, the most exquisite artifice simulating the absence of all art, of Horace; but the care, and dexterity, and superior refinement of Pope, his neatness, and concentration, and point, supply a better substitute for these charms than the ruder strength and more turbulent passion of Dryden. If Dryden, too, has more natural fire and force, and rises in his greater passages to a stormy grandeur to which the other does not venture to commit himself, Pope in some degree compensates for that by a dignity, a quiet, sometimes pathetic, majesty, which we find nowhere in Dryden's poetry. Dryden has translated the Æneid, and Pope the Iliad; but the two tasks would apparently have been better distributed if Dryden had chanced to have taken up Homer, and left Virgil to Pope. Pope's Iliad, in truth, whatever may be its merits of another kind, is, in spirit and style, about the most un-Homeric performance in the