and the decalogue, No. iv.; and the gospel, ib.; declara- tion of, an awful act, 271; its delusions and suicidal results, 473; as defined by Lieber, Vattel, &c., 549; as described by Homer, 549; by Shakspeare, ib.; influ- ence on domestic happiness, 457-68; its effect in driv- ing Christianity out of the East, 491; the nurse of du- elling, 384; adverse to free- dom, 406-8; with England in 1812, a failure, 400; feu- dal, how abolished, 43; does not forgive, 49; glimpse of, by Dr. Channing, 313-24; its general evils and horrors, No. ii., iv., 65-76, 77-80, 81-92, 113-24, 151-4, 157-60, 161-72, 177-80, 197-200, 313-17, 325-32, 305-12, 393-6, 439-44, 449-68, 469–72, 473-5, 488-98, 509-16; and the hearth, 457-68; its moral chief evils, 157-60, 509-16; on whom its evils fall, No. ii.; insensibility to its evils explained, 269-76; incon- sistent with nature, 77; with Christianity, No. iii., iv., 49, 77-80, 129-36, 137-48, 257- 62, 278-80, 434-9, 470-72, 517-40; its inefficacy. 397- 408, 550-2; the infidel's view of it as inconsistent with Christianity, 358; de- structive to minds, 582; in- fluences which still counte- nance it, 554-76; its influ- ence on literature, science, education, 580-3; influence on morals, 375; on piety, 576; on the Sabbath, 380;
by, according to Dick, 172, according to Burke, ib.; its licentiousness, No. iv., 161, 382-3, 369-72; case at Al- bany, 371; at N. Y., 372; in Eng., 451; its meliorations, 42; its effects on mind, 578; missions, obstructive to, 386-8, 489-500; its moral character, 173-6, 179-80; not necessary, 39; its sup- posed necessity, 554; neu- tralizes means of grace,454; case, 455; occasions of, 243, 318-20, 501-8; offensive and defensive not distin- guished in the N.Testament, 536-7; prayers, 357, 556; punishments in, 65–76, No. ii.; as a judicial redress, 485-8; only remedy for, 289-92; revivals, an obsta- cle to, 385; violates the Sab- bath, No. iv., 380; a school of profaneness, 383; sketch of, No. ii.; slavery, 132, 378, 576; solemn review of, 293- 304; sources or springs of, 318-20; substitutes for, No. i., 213-28; souls destroyed by, 449-56; spirit in con- trast with the Christian spi- rit, 453; its spirit, 586; suf- ferings of soldiers in, No. ii., and temperance, 379; a trial by battle, 549-52; unchristian, 257-68; of the Jews, 172; of the reforma- tion, ib.; of the Grecians, ib.; of the middle ages, ib.; of the twelve Cæsars, ib.; of the Romans, ib.; of the Sar- acens, ib.; of the Turks, ib.; of the Tartars, ib. Warriors, their testimonies against war, No. iii.; how enlisted, 457; how treat- ed, 65-76; engross politi- cal power, 580; wounded, their fate, 85, 394
Warrior and the philanthro- pist in contrast, No. iii.
Ward on war, War-ships, their expenses, 414-5, 564; of different countries, 562-3; one de- scribed by Sumner, 556; brothels, No. iv., 162, 372, 383 Washington on War, No. iii.; his administration, its war expenses, 573; his use of the peace princi- ple with Payne, Waterloo, battle of, 170; wounded there, No. ii. Watson, bishop, on war, No. iii., Wellington on war, No. iii., conduct after the battle of Waterloo, 568; views of war, 357, as unsuitable for a conscientious Christian, 579 Webster, Rev. J. C., state- ments on flogging in navy, 66 West Point academy, its moral influence, 381; cost, 494 Wesley, John, on war, 173
« PreviousContinue » |