and the decalogue, No. iv.; and the gospel, ib.; declara- tion of, an awful act, 271 ; its delusions and suicidal results, 473 ; as defined by Lieber, Vatiel, &c., 549; as described by Homer, 549 ; by Shakspeare, ib. ; influ- ence on domestic happiness, 457-68 ; its effect in driv- ing Christianity out of the East, 491; the nurse of du- elling, 384; adverse to free- dom, 406–8; with England in 1812, a failure, 400, feu- dal, how abolished, 43; does not forgive, 49 ; glimpse of, by Dr. Channing, 313–24; its general evils and horrors, No. ii., iv., 65–76, 77-80, 81--92, 113–24, 151-4, 157-60, 161-72, 177-80, 197–200, 313–17, 325–32, 305-12, 393-6, 439–44, 449–68, 469–72, 473-5, 488–98, 509-16; and the hearth, 457-68; its moral chief evils, 157-60, 509–16; on whom its evils fall, No. ii.; insensibility to its evils explaine 269-76 ; incon- sistent with nature, 77; with Christianity, No. iii., iv., 49, 77-80, 129-36, 137-48, 257– 62, 278–80, 434-9, 470–72, 517-40; its inefficacy. 397- 408, 550-2 ; the infidel's view of it as inconsistent with Christianity, 358 ; de- structive to minds, 582; in-. fluences which still counte- nance ii, 554–76 ; its influ- ence on literature, science, education, 580–3; influence on morals, 375; on piety, 576; on the Sabbath, 380 ; its hardening influence,
its laws, what, 231, 485; loss of life in, No. iv., 161-72; total loss of life
by, according to Dick, 172, according to Burke, ib.; its licentiousness, No. iv., 161, 381-3, 369-72 ; case at Al- bany, 371; at N. Y., 372; in Eny., 451; its meliorations, 42; its effects on mind, 578; missions, obstructive to, 386–8, 489–500 ; its moral character, 173–6, 179–80 ; not necessary, 39 ; its sup- posed necessity, 554; deu- tralizes means of grace,454; case, 455; occasions of, 243, 318-20, 501-8; offensive and defensive not distin- guished in the N.Testament, 536–7; prayers, 357, 556 ; punishments in, 65–76, No. ii.; as a judicial redress, 485–8; only remedy for, 289-92 ; revivals, an obsta- cle to, 385; violates the Sab- bath, No. iv., 380; a school of profaneness, 383; sketch of, No. ii.; slavery, 132, 378,
solemn review of, 293– 304; sources or springs of, 318–20; substitutes for, No. i., 213–28; souls destroyed by, 449–56 ; spirit in con- trast with the Christian spi- rit, 453 ; its spirit, 586 ; suf- ferings of soldiers in, No. ii., and temperance, 379; a trial by battle, 549–52; unchristian, 257–68; of the Jews, 172; of the reforma- tion, ib.; of the Grecians, ib.; of the middle ages, ib.; of the twelve Cæsars, ib.; of the Romans, ib.; of the Sar- acens, ib.; of the Turks, ib.;
of the Tartars, ib. Warriors, their testimonies
against war, No. iii.; how enlisted, '457; how treat- ed, 65-76; engross politi- cal power, 580; wounded, their fate,
85, 394
Warrior and the philanthro- White, murdered in Salem, 51
pist in contrast, No. iii. Wilna, dead bodies there, No. ii. Ward on war, -
174 Witnesses for peace, No. War-ships, their expenses, xxi.,
173 414-5, 564; of different Wirtemburg's loss of popu- countries, 562-3; one de- lation,
198–9 scribed by Sumner, 556; Wolfe,account of objections brothels, No. iv., 162, 372, 383 to Christianity from wars Washington on War, No. of Christians,
390, 496 ii.; his administration, its Women, claims of peace on, war expenses, 573 ; his 361-72 ;influence of war- use of the peace princi- dresses on, 363; warriors ple with Payne,
348 in France, 364; encour- Waterloo, battle of, 170; age war, 364–6; degrad- wounded there, No. ii.
ed by war, 388 ; abused Watson, bishop, on war, in sieges and assaults, No. iii.,
173 460–1; their duty to Wellington on war, No. iii.,
peace,
63-4 conduct after the battle of Woolwich arsenal,
563 Waterloo, 568; views of
Wycliffe on war,
173 war, 357, as unsuitable for
a conscientious Christian, 579 Xerxes' army, 171,582; men Webster, Rev. J. C., state- lost by, No. iv.,
171 ments on flogging in navy, 66 West Point academy, its Yarmouth, battle of, 170
moral influence, 381; cost, 494 Wesley, John, on war, 173 Ziska, John, allusion to, 573
« PreviousContinue » |