Transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas

Front Cover

From inside the book

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 97 - REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE SAFEGUARDING OF VESSELS, HARBORS, PORTS, AND WATERFRONT FACILITIES OF THE UNITED STATES...
Page 68 - The liability of the owner of any vessel for any embezzlement, loss or destruction by any person of any property, goods or merchandise, shipped or put on board of such vessel, or for any loss, damage or injury by collision, or for any act, matter or thing, loss, damage or forfeiture, done, occasioned or incurred, without the privity or knowledge of such owner or owners, shall in no case exceed the amount or value of the interest of such owner in such vessel and her freight then pending.
Page 54 - Pipeline facilities" includes, without limitation, new and existing pipe rights-of-way and any equipment facility, or building used in the transportation of gas or the treatment of gas during the course of transportation but "rights-of-way" as used in this Act does not authorize the Secretary to prescribe the location or routing of any pipeline facility; (5) "State...
Page 60 - Technology and Current Practices for Processing, Transferring, and Storing Liquefied Natural Gas
Page 60 - LNG facility is at a level of less than 10~s year (equivalent to the risks associated with machinery) would require a statistical data base of about 500,000 plant-years of operation without major accident causing a fatality beyond the plant boundaries. Even with major growth in the LNG industry, experience accumulated through the next decade will be about two orders of magnitude below that required to assure a risk level of 10~5 fatality/year by statistical data.
Page 60 - A statistical estimate of risk can be made if enough years of experience with the system are available. Unfortunately, the total operating experience of the LNG industry' is not sufficient to demonstrate that risk levels are acceptably low on a purely statistical basis. For example, to assure that the risk of any fatality from an LNG facility is at a level of less than...
Page 60 - Unfortunately, ^vthe total operating experience of the LNG industry is not sufficient to demonstrate that risk levels are acceptably low on a purely statistical basis. For example, to assure that the risk of any fatality from an LNG facility is at a level of less than 10~5/year (equivalent to the risks associated with machinery...
Page 59 - This optimism was soon dispelled by hundreds of cases of unexpected test and operational failures and thousands of system malfunctions. Many of the failures and malfunctions modes had either been previously analyzed and seemed to be noncredible events or had come as a complete surprise which previous analyses had not identified at all.
Page 72 - ... the concentration of exports among a few countries; • inelastic demand for the material; • inelastic supply of the material (or of close substitutes) from sources outside the cartel; and • policy cohesion and export discipline among members to keep supply limited enough to maintain high prices or possibly to achieve other goals as well. Members of the cartel must be strong enough financially to accumulate stocks and forego current export earnings. Liquefied natural gas is somewhat difficult...
Page 20 - LNG/LPG vessels entering, moored in, or leaving a US port. The Coast Guard is responsible for port safety under authority of 50 USC 191, Executive Order 10173, and the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (33 USC 1221 et seq.). This responsibility applies to "any vessel, bridge, or other structure on or in the navigable waters of the United States, or any land structure or shore area Immediately adjacent to those waters.

Bibliographic information