 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1884 - 580 pages
...right of selection: No one can clnim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-name or trade-mark •which would practically give him a monopoly in...goods other than those produced or made by himself. * * * Nor can a Runeric name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities,... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - Copyright - 1875 - 814 pages
...is applied. Ibid. 7. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods otlier than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1877 - 678 pages
...have become such by association. No oue can claim protection for the exclusive use of a tnule-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any gooda other than those produced or made by himself. A generic name, or a name merely descriptive of... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1879 - 530 pages
...mark were allowed: No one en 11 claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-mime which would practically give him a monopoly in the...the public would be injured rather than protected, lor competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely descriptive of an article... | |
 | Engineering - 1879 - 550 pages
...to be over, looked. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...himself. If he could, the public would be injured mther than protected, for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1881 - 1900 pages
...of Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 1. There the court said, speakin? through Mr. Justice Strong, that no one can claim protection for the exclusive use...of any goods other than those produced or made by him&lf. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed.... | |
 | David Hall Rice, Lepine Cooper Rice - Patent laws and legislation - 1880 - 508 pages
...trade mark. Ibid. 88. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or a trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...goods other than those produced or made by himself. Ibid. 89. "For Family Use," when applied to an article, indicates as plainly as words can the use for... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 2118 pages
...thus presented by Mr. Justice Strong, speaking for the court: "No one can claim protection for tlie exclusive use of a trade-mark or tradename which would practically give him a monopoly in the wile of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public wnuld be injured,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1925 - 1112 pages
...afford no protection to either against the sale of a spurious in place of the genuine article. * * * No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark • • • which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1882 - 962 pages
...protection for the exclusive use of a mark which Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Hosiery Mills. would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those of his own manufacture. See also, Oilman v. Hunnewell, 122 Mass. 139. Letters and figures, when used... | |
| |
No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. 
