Page images

“shall use, practice, or exercise any invocation or conjuration of any “evil and wicked spirit; or shall consult, covenant with, entertain, -“employ, feed, or reward any evil and wicked spirit to and for any in“tent or purpose;—or take up any dead man, woman or child, out “of his, her, or their grave, or any other place, where the dead body “resteth, or the skin, bone, or any other part of any dead person, to “be employed in any manner of witchcraft, inchantment, charm or sor“cery, whereby any person shall be killed, destroyed, wasted, consum“ed, pined or lamed in his or her body, or any part thereof; that then “every such offender, or offenders, their aiders, abettors, and counsel“lors, being guilty of any of the said offences, duly and lawfully con“victed, shall suffer pains of death, as a felon or felons, and shall lose “the benefit of clergy and sanctuary. - “And further, to the intent that all manner of practice, use or exer“cise of witchcraft, inchantment, charm, or sorcery, should be from “henceforth utterly abolished, be it enacted, that, if any person or per“sons, shall from and after the feast of St. Michael next coming, take “upon him or them by witchcraft, inchantment, charm, or sorcery, to “tell or declare in what place any treasure might be found, or where “goods, or things lost or stolen, should be found, or to the intent to “provoke any person to unlawful love; or whereby any cattle or goods “of any person, shall be destroyed, wasted or impaired; or to hurt or “destroy any person in his or her body, although the same be not effect“ed; that then all persons, so offending, and being convicted, shall “suffer a year's imprisonment, and stand in the pillory once every “quarter for six hours, and there openly confess his, or her error, and “offence.” The second offence is felony. 1 jac. 1. cap. 12. Lord Coke hath written a learned comment upon this statute, in which he declares, that it would be a very great defect in government to suffer so great an abomination, as conjuration, witchcraft, and sorcery, to pass with impunity. 3 Inst. 44. But the tendency of the statute of the 1st of james the 1st, may best appear from the cheats, perjuries, and various other mischiefs, which it produced, to the ruin of many innocent persons; all which are but too well known to require any particular mention. vid. Mather's Hist, of New Fngland; and Salmon's Universal Traveller. vol. II. p. 695. This act nevertheless coutinued to be a scandal and reproach to the good sense of the nation, till the 9th year of George the 2d, when it was enacted by parliament, “That the statute, made “in the first year of king James the first, intitled, An act against conju“ration, witchcroft, and dealing with evil and wicked spirits, shall be

“repealed and utterly void, except so much as repeals the statute of “the 5th of Elizabeth, intitled an act against conjuration, &c. &c.—that “an act passed in Scotland, in the ninth parliament of Queen Mary, in“titled Anentis witchcrafts, shall be repealed—and that from the “24th of june no prosecution, suit or proceeding, shall be carried on “against any person for witchcraft, sorcery, inchantment, or conjura“tion, or for charging another with any such offence, in any court “whatsoever in Great Britain—but that any person, pretending to “exercise witchcraft, tell fortunes, or discover stolen goods, shall suf. “fer imprisonment for one whole year, stand in the pillory once every “quarter for an hour; and if the court shall think proper, be obliged “to give sureties to behave well for the future.” 9 Geo. 2. Harris. Thus far Harris: to whose note add Cod. 9. 18. Those who desire further information on the practical comments that have taken place, on that notable passage in the old Testament, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live” may consult sir James Melville's memoirs as to the examination of the witches before James 6th of Scotland : the trial of Amy Duny and Rose Cullender, widows, both of Leystoff, in Suffolk, before sir Matthew Hale, on the 10th of March 16th Ch. 2nd. at Bury St. Edmonds, where says the account, “in conclusion, the judge and all “the court were fully satisfied with the verdict, and thereupon gave “Judgment against the witches that they should be hanged. They “were much urged to confess, but would not: on the 17th of March “following they were executed;” much to the credit of sir Matthew Hale ! See also the statements which Ch. Justice Marshall in his life of Washington Vol. 1. Appendix page 9, gives of the proceedings of the bigots of New England in 1692, from Hutchinson; and Dr. Feriar's essay on popular illusions in the Manchester transactions. $6. Deparracidiis, p. 388. Vide Dig 48.8 and 9. Cod 9. 16 and 17. Delege Pompeia de parracidiis. On the laws desicariis et parricidiis, see further, Cod. Theodos. 9.14 and 15, with Godefroy's commentary, V. 3 p 84–118. - - $ 7. De falsis, p. 389. Dig. 48, 10. 5 Fliz. ch. 14. 8 Geo. 1. ch. 22. 12 Geo. 1 ch. 22. 2 Geo. 2 ch. 25, &c. Our Pennsylvania actres. pecting forgery. § 8. De vi, p. 389. Dig. 48.6. 7. Cod. 9. 13. $ 9. De peculatus, p. 390. A pecore, in which wealth chiefly consisted in early times. Dig. 48.13. .* $10. De plagiariis, p. 390. Dig. 48.15. Cod. 9. 20. I have already spoken of Kidnapping, at sect. 9, of Tit. 1 of this book of the Institutes. .. - - -

§ 11. De ambitu, p. 391. . . . . . . . . . . Lex julia de ambitu.] vid...f. 48. t. 14. -

The crime, which the Romans called ambitus, is committed by procuring any public office with money, or other gifts; and it seems to be the same offence in regard to temporal offices, as simony is in regard to spiritual preferment. Decret. Greg. ix, lib. 5, t. 3.

But ambitus, or the buying and selling of offices, ceased to be criminal, and became common among the Romans, soon after the demolition of the republic; and this practice continued, till justinian, becoming sensible of its evil tendency, enforced the ancient laws in order to restrain it. Nov. 8. cap. 1. 7.

In France judicial offices are publicly set to sale, and generally sold to the highest bidder; and perhaps, as Vinny observes, there may be less reason to prohibit this species of commerce in a monarchy, than in a democracy. But in England the statute of the 5th and 6th of Edw. VI. restrains “all persons, under pain of forfeiture and disability for the future, from “buying certain offices, which concern the king's revenue, and the ex“ecution of justice.” And under these offices not only that of the chancellor of a diocess is comprehended, but also that of a commissary and register; for it was resolved in the case of doctor Trevor, the chancellor of a diocess in Wales, that both the offices of chancellor, and register, are within the statute, because they concern the administration of justice. 3 Co. Inst. 148. 12 Co. rep. 78. 79, 3 Lev. 289. Woodward v. Fox. Harris. -

Lex Julia repetundarum.] This law forbids all persons in public of fices to take money or presents, either for administering justice, or committing injustice. Lege julia repetundarum [pecuniarum] tenetur, qui, cum aliquam potestem haberet, pecuniam ob jadicandum decernenaumve acceperit. ff. 48. t. 11.

Jortescue, on the laws of England, declares “bribery to be a great “misprision, which is committed, when any man in a judicial place * takes any fee or pension, robe or livery, gift, reward or brocage of “any person, who hath to do before him any way, for doing his office, “ or by color of his office, but of the king only, unless it be of meat “and drink, and that of small value. cap. 51.” 3 Co. Inst. 145. Harris. De anona.] The crime fraudatae anona is that of abusing the markets, by raising the price of provisions, forestalling, monopolizing, &c. This offence is punishable in England by imprisonment and forfeiture of the goods or merchandise forestalled. See 25 Ed. 3 cap. 3. 2 Ric. 2. cap. 2. 27 Ed. 3. cap. 11. 5, 6 Edw. 6. cap. 14. 3 Co. Inst. p. 195.

De residuis.] 6rimen residui is committed by retaining the public <money, or converting it to otherusesthan those, to which it was appropriated. • Lege julia de residuis tenetur, qui publicam pecuniam de

begatam in usum aliquem retinuit, neque in eum oonsumpsit. ff. 48. t. 33. Harr*.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]



From Fathers Catrou, and Rouillè.

Hook's Rom. Hist. Vol. 2. p. 314. 8vo.

* * * *


of LAW suits. I. Law. Go immediately with the person who cites you before the judge. II. Law. If the person you cite refuses to go with you before the judge, take some that are present to be witnesses of it, and you shall have a right to compel him to appear. III. Law. If the person cited endeavours to escape from you, or puts himself into a posture of resistance, you may seize his body. IV. Law. If the person prosecuted be old, or infirm, let him be carried in a jumentum, or open carriage. But if he refuse that, the prosecutor shall not be obliged to provide him an Arcera, or a covered carriage. V. Law. But if the person cited find a surety, let him go. VI. Law. Only a rich man shall be security for a rich man. But any security shall be sufficient for a poor man. VII. Law. The judge shall give judgment according to the agreement made between the two parties by the way. VIII. Law. If the person cited has made no agreement with his adversary, let the Praetor hear the cause from sun-rising till noon; and let both parties be present when it is heard, whether it be in the Forum, or Comitium. IX. Law. Let the same Praetor give judgment in the afternoon, though but one of the parties be present. X. Law. Let no jūdgments be given after the going down of the Sun.

« PreviousContinue »