| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1852 - 668 pages
...When administrations are granted to different persons, in different States, they are so far deemed independent of each other, that a judgment obtained...of his own administration; for in contemplation of the law there is no privacy between him and the other administrator." Without citing other authorities... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1856 - 798 pages
...Where administrations are granted to different persons in different states, they are so far deemed independent of each other, that a judgment obtained...privity between him and the other administrator." Conf. of Laws, s. 522. In Stacy v. Thrasher, 6 Howard 44, it was held that an administrator, acting... | |
| Joseph Story - Conflict of laws - 1857 - 1102 pages
...Where administrations are granted to different persons in different States, they are so far deemed independent of each other, that a judgment obtained...law, there is no privity between him and the other administrator.2 It might be different, if the same person were administrator in both States.8 On the... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - Law reports, digests, etc - 1870 - 892 pages
...where administrations are granted to different persons in different States, they are so far deemed independent of each other that a judgment obtained...privity between him and the other administrator." See Story, Conn. of Laws, § 522; Brodie v. Bickley, 2 Rawle, 431. The- same doctrine is recognized... | |
| Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 658 pages
...to different persons in different states they are so far independent of each other that a judgment against one will furnish no right of action against...the other, to affect assets received by the latter by virtue of his own administration, because there is said to be no privity between him and the other... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 1282 pages
...persons in different States, they arc so far deemed independent of each other, that a judgment ob taineu against one will furnish no right of action against the other, to affect assets received hy the latter in virtue of his own administration ; for in contemplation of law there is no privity... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 1050 pages
...no privity between administrators of estates of same intestate in different states, and a judgment against one will furnish no right of action against the other to affect assets received by latter under his own administration ; and this is true where the same person is adminstrator in both... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 1242 pages
...where administrations are granted to different persons in different states, they are so far deemed independent of each other that a judgment obtained...privity between him and the other administrator,"'— citing Story, Confl. Laws, § 522. In Reed v. Reed, 91 Ky. 207, 15 SW 525, 11 LRA 513, this court said:... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1036 pages
...against one j wit! furnish no right of action agninst the other, to affect assets received by the Intter in virtue of his own administration ; for in contemplation...privity between him and the other administrator.' " Reference is there made to the cases of Jefferson v. Beall, 117 Ala. 436, 23 South. 44, 67 Am. St... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1891 - 1266 pages
...administrator in Louisiana was no presentation to the other, and the judgment obtained in Louisiana furnished no right of action against the other to affect assets received by him. 3. Where the primary administration is in one elate, nou-i-esident creditors must prove their... | |
| |