§ 280. Objections; how stated. An objection to a pleading must be distinctly specified in the notice of motion. An objection under the last section but one must point out specifically the particular defect relied upon, except as otherwise provided in this section. An objection to a complaint, or to a separate statement therein of a cause of action, or to a counterclaim, that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action or counterclaim, or that the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, or that another action is pending between the same parties for the same cause, or an objection to a defense that it is insufficient in law upon the face thereof, may be so stated without further particulars. (Am. by L. 1921, ch. 372, in effect Oct. 1, 1921.) Derivation.-New. Adapted from code civ. proc., §§ 490, 496. $490, as am. by L. 1877, ch. 416; first sentence originally revised from code of proc., § 145, in part; second sentence new in code civ. proc., § 496 new in code civ. proc.; but see code of proc., § 153. The amendment of 1921 made to conform to civil practice rules, 106-111. § 281. Motion as to part; pleading as to remainder. A party may make a motion directed to a specified cause of action, counterclaim or defense and plead to a separate cause of action, counterclaim or defense, contained in the same pleading. (Am. by L. 1921, ch. 372, in effect Oct. 1, 1921.) Derivation.-A substitute for code civ. proc., § 492; The amendment of 1921 made to conform to civil originally revised from code of proc., § 145, in part, and practice rules, 106-111. § 151. § 282. Effect of serving answer or reply pending a motion. The service of an answer or reply to a pleading, or to a separate cause of action, counterclaim or defense, to which a motion has been addressed, shall be deemed an abandonment of the motion. This section, however, shall not be deemed to authorize the service of such answer or reply after the time therefor expires and before the determination of the motion, without an order therefor. Derivation.-New. § 283. Pleading after disposition of motion. If objections to a pleading, presented by motion, be not sustained, the moving party may serve an answer or reply, or an amended answer or reply where he has pleaded to a separate cause of action, counterclaim or defense not affected by the motion, as a matter of right, after the decision of the motion and before the expiration of ten days after service of notice of the entry of the order deciding the motion, unless the court shall be of the opinion, to be stated in the order, that the objections are frivolous. Upon the decision of a point of law, at trial or special term or in the appellate division or court of appeals, the court, in its discretion, also may allow the party in fault to plead anew or amend, upon such terms as are just. Derivation.-New. See code civ. proc., § 497, am. by L. 1877, ch. 416; originally revised from code of proc., $172. Plead over.-Whiting v. Mayor, 37 N. Y. 600; McCargo v. Jergens, 206 N. Y. 363; Hull v. Hull, 225 N. Y. 342; McNeil v. Board of Supervisors, 131 App. Div. 126, 115 N. Y. Supp. 215; Nillson v. Lawrence, 148 App. Div. 155, 132 N. Y. Supp. 664; Crotty v. Erie Railroad Co., 149 App. Div. 262, 133 N. Y. Supp. 696; Keepers v. Hartley Co., 150 App. Div. 252, 134 N. Y. Supp. 896; Hamilton Trust Co. v. Schevlin, 156 App. Div. 307, 141 N. Y. Supp. 232; White v. Jackson, 39 Misc. 218, 79 N. Y. Supp. 393; Hayes v. Kedzie, 11 Hun 577; Thatcher v. Candee, 3 Keyes 157. § 284. Disposition of points of law. Amendment.-Coler v. Lamb, 24 App. Div. 623, 48 N. Y. Supp. 223; Woodworth v. Brooklyn Elev. R. R. Co., 29 App. Div. 1, 51 N. Y. Supp. 323; Myers v. Lederer, 119 App. Div. 332, 104 N. Y. Supp. 236; Crowley v. La Brake, 147 App. Div. 389, 132 N. Y. Supp. 155; Hamilton Trust Co. v. Schevlin, 156 App. Div. 307, 141 N. Y. Supp. 232; Palma v. Town of North Hempstead, 170 App. Div. 512, 156 N. Y. Supp. 468; Cox v. Bates, 27 Misc. 816, 57 N. Y. Supp. 816; German Savings Bank v. Dunn, 75 Misc. 251, 135 N. Y. Supp. 56; O'Connor v. Christopher, 90 Misc. 77, 152 N. Y. Supp. 955; Fielden v. Carelli, 26 How. Pr. 173, 16 Abb. 289; Snow v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 7 Rob. 479. (Repealed by L. 1921, ch. 372, in effect Oct. 1, 1921, to conform to rules of civil practice, 106-111.) 121 When any sum of money shall be due and payable under or on account of a contract and the whole, or any part thereof exceeding fifty dollars in amount, shall be claimed or demanded by adverse claimants, the debtor may bring suit in any court having jurisdiction thereof and of the parties demanding judgment of interpleader and and that the debtor be permitted to pay the amount of the debt into court and that such debtor upon such payment into court be discharged from any further liability to any of the parties to the action. Derivation. Code civ. proc., § 820a, as added by L. 1908, ch. 285, first sentence, without change of substance. Construction.-Rosenberg v. Viane, Inc., 109 Misc. 215, 179 N. Y. Supp. 447. Application.-Brown v. Arbogast, etc., Co., 162 App. Div. 603, 147 N. Y. Supp. 998; U. S. Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Vermilye & Power, 72 Misc. 375, 130 N. Y. Supp. 303. $286. Procedure in action of interpleader. When service of the summons and complaint shall have been made upon all the claimants in an action of interpleader based on a contract under or on account of which a sum of money shall be due and payable, where the whole or any part thereof exceeds fifty dollars in amount, the plaintiff may make application, by petition or upon affidavits for an order permitting and directing the plaintiff to pay the amount of the debt into court and that the plaintiff upon the payment into court of the amount of the debt as required by the order be discharged from any further liability to any of the defendants in such action, and the court, upon satisfactory proof by affidavit or otherwise as the court may require of the facts alleged in the complaint and that the whole or part of the debt is claimed adversely by the defendants without any collusion on the part of the plaintiff and that the amount thereof is not in dispute, may make such an order upon such terms as to costs and disbursements payable out of the money so adversely claimed as to the court may seem just; and upon the payment into court of the amount of such debt and complying with the terms of such order, the plaintiff shall stand discharged from any further liability to any of the defendants in said action on account of such debt and contract. Notice of such application, together with copies of the papers upon which the same is made, shall be personally served on each of the defendants at least five and not more than fifteen days before the return day thereof. Derivation.-Code civ. proc., § 820a, as added by L. 1908, ch. 285, except first sentence, without change of substance. Complaint.-Pouch v. Prudential Ins. Co., 204 N. Y. 281; Sulzberger v. Seklir, 153 App. Div. 749, 138 N. Y. Supp. 691. Service of nonresidents by publication.-Hanna v. Stedman, 230 N. Y. 326. § 287. Interpleader in pending action. Parties defendant.-Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Frick Co., 146 App. Div. 605, 131 N. Y. Supp. 125. Proof.-Western Commercial Travellers' Assn. v. Langeheineken, 139 App. Div. 592, 124 N. Y. Supp. 182. Dispute as to amount involved.-Empire Engineering Corp. v. Mack, 217 N. Y. 85; Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor v. Stapf, 160 N. Y. Supp. 1051. A defendant against whom an action to recover upon a contract or an action of ejectment or an action to recover a chattel is pending at any time before answer upon proof by affidavit that a person not a party to the action makes a demand against him for the same debt or property without collusion with him may apply to the court upon notice to that person and the adverse party for an order to substitute that person in his place and to discharge him from liability to either, on his paying into court the amount of the debt or delivering the possession of the property or its value to such person as the court directs; or, upon it appearing that the defendant disputes in whole or in part the liability as asserted against him by different claimants or that he has some interest in the subject-matter of the controversy which he desires to assert, his application may be for an order joining the other claimant or claimants as co-defendants with him in the action. The court, in its discretion, may make such order upon such terms as to cost and payments into court of the amount of the debt or part thereof or delivery of the possession of the property or its value or part thereof as may be just, and thereupon the entire controversy may be determined in the action. Derivation.-Code civ. proc., §820, as am. by L. 1877, ch. 416, L. 1894, ch. 246, without change of substance; originally revised from code of proc., 122, last sentence. References.-Bringing in necessary parties, C. P. A., § 193; interpleader in court of claims, Ct. Cl. A., § 20; interpleading claimants to bank deposits, banking 1., § 113. Construction.-Hemmerich v. Union Dime Sav. Institution, 144-App. Div. 413, 419, 129 N. Y. Supp. 267; Rosenberg v. Viane, Inc., 109 Misc. 215, 179 N. Y. Supp. 447. Intent and purpose.-Pouch v. Prudential Ins. Co., 204 N. Y. 281. Application.-Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Arthur, 90 N. Y. 234; Rundle v. Gordon, 27 App. Div. 452, 50 N. Y. Supp. 353; Follett Wool Co. v. Albany T. W. Co., 61 App. Div. 296, 70 N. Y. Supp. 474; Boskowitz v. Boskowitz, 124 App. Div. 849, 852, 109 N. Y. Supp. 490; Bullowa v. Provident Life & Trust Co., 125 App. Div. 545, 109 N. Y. Supp. 1058; Best v. New York City Water Front Co., 158 App. Div. 555, 143 N. Y. Supp. 814; Krugman v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co., 45 Misc. 346, 90 N. Y. Supp. 448; U. S. Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Vermilye & Power, 72 Misc. 375, 130 N. Y. Supp. 303; Katz v. Witt, 74 Misc. 582, 134 N. Y. Supp. 675; Lane v. New York Life Ins. Co., 56 Hun 92, 9 N. Y. Supp. 52; Newcombe v. Ostrander, 107 Misc. 672, 177 N. Y. Supp. 391. Nature of remedy.-Windecker v. Mtuual Life Ins. Co., 12 App. Div. 73, 43 N. Y. Supp. 358; La Fernina v. Arsene, 69 App. Div. 285, 74 N. Y. Supp. 749; Hasberg v. Moses, 81 App. Div. 199, 80 N. Y. Supp. 867; Helene v. Corn Exch. Bank, 96 App. Div. 392, 89 N. Y. Supp. 319; N. E. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Odell, 50 Hun 279, 2 Ñ. Y. Supp. 873; Drefus v. Casey, 52 Hun 95, 5 N. Y. Supp. 65; Schell v. Lowe, 75 Hun 43, 26 N. Y. Supp. 991; Du Bois v. Union Dime Sav. Inst., 89 Hun 382, 35 N. Y. Supp. 397. Action becomes equitable.-Clark v. Mosher, 107.. N. Y. 118; Gleason v. Bush, 166 App. Div. 865, 152 N. Y. Supp. 54; Wells v. Corn Exch. Bank, 43 Misc. 377, 87 N. Y. Supp. 480; Dinley v. McCullough, 92 Hun 454, 36 N. Y. Supp. 1007. Action "upon a contract."-Walker v. City of New York, 72 Misc. 97, 129 N. Y. Supp. 1059. Disputed claims.-Morgan v. Sagamore Development Co., 193 App. Div. 475, 184 N. Y. Supp. 311. Adverse claimants.--St. John v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 132 App. Div. 515, 117 N. Y. Supp. 1077. Jurisdiction in bankruptcy.-Brewers & M. Ins. Co. v. Davenport, 10 Hun 264. Time of motion.-Edelson v. Epstein, 27 Misc. 543, 58 N. Y. Supp. 334; Butler v. Atlantic Trust Co., 28 Misc. 42, 59 N. Y. Supp. 814; Michigan Sav. Bank v. Coy, Hunt & Co., 45 Misc. 40, 90 N. Y. Supp. 814. Failure to apply before answer.-Sophian v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 184 App. Div. 553. Notice.-O'Connor v. Lock, 148 App. Div. 765, 133 N. Y. Supp. 320; Vyne v. Mosson, 92 Misc. 447, 156 N. Y. Supp. 274. Proof necessary.-Pouch v. Prudential Ins. Co., 204 N. Y. 281; Mitchell v. Catlin & Powell Co., 71 Misc. 450, 128 N. Y. Supp. 692; Vyne v. Mosson, 92 Misc. 447, 156 N. Y. Supp. 274; Singer v. New York Life Ins. Co., 160 N. Y. Supp. 442. Order discretionary.-Barry v. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 53 N. Y. 536. Interpleader by consent.-Jacobs v. Lieberman, 51 App. Div. 542, 64 N. Y. Supp. 953. Order granted. Crane v. McDonald, 118 N. Y. 648; Bassett v. Leslie, 123 N. Y. 396; McCormick v. Supreme Council C. B. L., 6 App. Div. 175, 39 N. Y. Supp. 1010; Stevenson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 10 App. Div. 233, 41 N. Y. Supp. 964; Woolworth v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co., 25 App. Div. 629, 49 N. Y. Supp. 512; American Trust & Sav. Bank v. Thalheimer, 29 Div. 170, 51 N. Y. Supp. 803; Golden v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 35 App. Div. 569, 55 N. Y. Supp. 143; Southwark Nat. Bank v. Childs, 39 App. Div. 560, 57 N. Y. Supp. 789; Post v. Emmett, 40 App. Div. 477, 58 N. Y. Supp. 129; Wells v. Nat. City Bank, 40 App. Div. 498, 58 Ñ. Y. Supp. 125; Kreiser v. City of New York, 46 App. Div. 16, 61 N. Y. Supp. 329; Bacon v. American Surety Co., 53 App. Div. 150, 65 N. Y. Supp. 738; Grell v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co., 55 App. Div. 612, 67 N. Y. Supp. 253; Sullivan v. Crowe, 72 App. Div. 5, 76 N. Y. Supp. 98; Van Wagoner v. Buckley, 148 App. Div. 808, 133 N. Y. Supp. 599; Natowitz v. Independent Order Ahawas Israel, 149 App. Div. 607, 133 N. Y. Supp. 1065; Gleason v. Bush, 166 App. Div. 865, 152 N. Y. Supp. 54; Greenberger v. North Side Storage Warehouse Co., 170 App. Div. 887, 154 N. Y. Supp. 450; Mahro v. Greenwich Sav. Bank, 16 Misc. 537, 40 N. Y. Supp. 29; Lennon v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 20 Misc. 403, 45 N. Y. Supp. 1033; Schweiger v. German Sav. Bank, 27 Misc. 123, 57 N. Y. Supp. 356; Vandewater v. Mut. Res. L. Ins. Co., 44 Misc. 316, 89 N. Y. Supp. 845; Siegel v. Goldstone, 75 Misc. 469, 133 N. Y. Supp. 453; Barnes v. Mayor, 27 Hun 236; Mars v. Albany Savings Bank, 64 Hun 424, 19 N. Y. Supp. 791; s. c., 69 Hun 398, 23 N. Y. Supp. 658; Wenstrom Electric Co. v. Bloomer, 85 Hun 389, 32 N. Y. Supp. 903; Singer v. New York Life Ins. Co., 160 N. Y. Supp. 442. Interpleader by a trust company granted.-Evans v. Guaranty Trust Co., 187 App. Div. 30, 175 N. Y. Supp. 118. Order denied.-Reynolds v. Etna Life Ins. Co., 6 App. Div. 254, 39 N. Y. Supp. 885; Nat. Union Bank v. Kleinwort, 15 App. Div. 478, 44 N. Y. Supp. 469; Burritt v. Press Pub. Co., 19 App. Div. 609, 46 N. Y. Supp. 295; s. c., 25 App. Div. 141, 49 N. Y. Supp. 201; Bernstein v. Hamilton, 26 App. Div. 206, 49 N. Y. Supp. 932; Montague v. Jewelers & Tradesmen's Co., 41 App. Div. 530, 58 N. Y. Supp. 715; Carroll v. Demarest, 42 App. Div. 155, 58 N. Y. Supp. 1028; Jackson v. Knickerbocker Athletic Club, 49 App. Div. 107, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1109; McCreery v. Inge, 49 App. Div. 133, 63 N. Y. Supp. 158; Lateer v. Prudential Ins. Co., 64 App. Div. 423, 72 N. Y. Supp. 235; Mason v. Rice, 82 App. Div. 315, 82 N. Y. Supp. 541; Pouch v. Prudential Ins. Co., 146 App. Div. 612, 131 N. Y. Supp. 376; O'Connor v. Lock, 148 App. Div. 765, 133 N. Y. Supp. 320; Heymen v. Smadmack, 6 Misc. 527, 27 N. Y. Supp. 141; Master v. Bowery Sav. Bank, 31 Misc. 178, 63 N. Y. Supp. 964; Cohen v. Cohen, 35 Misc. 206, 71 N. Y. Supp. 481; Dennison v. Snyder, 98 Misc. 44, 162 N. Y. Supp. 271; Baker v. Brown, 64 Hun 627, 19 N. Y. Supp. 258; Du Bois v. Union Dime Sav. Inst., 89 Hun 382, 35 N. Y. Supp. 397; Appelbaum v. Rosenblum, 150 N. Y. Supp. 472; United Shoe Repairing Machine Co. v. Dochtermann Storage Warejouse Co., 186 App. Div. 359, 174 N. Y. Supp. 284. Interpleader of parties making no claim denied.Brown Shoe Co. v. Vandam Warehouse Co., 186 App. Div. 718, 175 N. Y. Supp. 68. Banking law.-Steiner v. East River Sav. Inst., 60 App. Div. 232, 70 N. Y. Supp. 223; McGuire v. Auburn Sav. Bank, 78 App. Div. 22, 79 N. Y. Supp. 91; Cosgriff v. Hudson City Sav. Inst., 24 Misc. 4, 52 N. Y. Supp. 189; Master v. Bowery Sav. Bank, 31 Misc. 178, 63 N. H. Supp. 964; Gottschall v. German Sav. Bank, 45 Misc. 27, 90 N. Y. Supp. 896. Nonresident, substitution of.-Bullowa v. Provident Life & Trust Co., 125 App. Div. 545, 109 N. Y. Supp. 1058. Injunction restraining replevin.-Altman & Co. v. Comstock, 165 App. Div. 160, 150 N. Y. Supp. 662. 123 ARTICLE 29 Testimony by deposition Sec. 288. Testimony by deposition during pendency of action, and before trial. 289. Testimony of corporation or association; how taken. 290. Notice of taking testimony by deposition. 291. Motion to vacate or modify the notice. 292. Proceeding by order in the first instance in lieu of notice. 293. Order for taking testimony by deposition before trial or after judgment. 294. General provisions relating to orders. 295. Testimony by deposition before action is commenced. 296. Production of books and papers. 297. Testimony of person in prison. 298. Testimony to be taken by stipulation. 299. Compelling attendance of witnesses. 300. Where witness may be compelled to attend. 301. Before whom testimony may be taken. 302. Manner of taking testimony. 303. When testimony by deposition to be read in evidence. 304. Conditions under which deposition may be read in evidence. 305. Effect of deposition. 306. Physical examination. 307. Testimony by deposition to be used on motion. 308. Depositions in special proceedings. 309. Letters rogatory. § 288. Testimony by deposition during pendency of action and before trial. Any party to an action in a court of record may cause to be taken by deposition, before trial, his own testimony or that of an adverse party, which is material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action. A party to such an action also may cause to be so taken the testimony, which is material and necessary, of the original owner of a claim which constitutes, or from which arose, a cause of action acquired by the adverse party by grant, conveyance, transfer, assignment or endorsement and which is set forth in his pleading as a cause of action or counterclaim. Any party to such an action also may cause to be so taken the testimony of any other person, which is material and necessary, where such person is about to depart from the state, or is without the state, or resides at a greater distance from the place of trial than one hundred miles, or is so sick or infirm as to afford reasonable grounds of belief that he will not be able to attend the trial, or other special circumstances render it proper that his deposition should be taken. (Am. by L. 1920, ch. 926.) Derivation.-New. Supersedes code civ. proc., § 870, in part, & 871, in part, § 872, in part, § 887, in References. Rules of civil practice, 120-137. Special circumstances.-Hill v. Bloomingdale, 136 App. Div. 651, 121 N. Y. Supp. 370; Harburger v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 167 App. Div. 1, 152 N. Y. Supp. 272; Barnet v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. Co., 106 Misc. 198, 175 N. Y. Supp. 491. Purpose of statute.-Koplin v. Hoe, 123 App. Div. 827, 108 N. Y. Supp. 602; Cahill v. Kursheedt, 30 Misc. 833, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1100; Doll v. Smith, 43 Misc. 417, 89 N. Y. Supp. 331, revd., 95 App. Div. 632, 88 N. Y. Supp. 1096; Hay v. Zeiger, 50 App. Div. 462, 64 N. Y. Supp. 202; Matter of Erie Malleable Iron Co., 90 Hun 62, 35 N. Y. Supp. 597; Continental Securities Co. v. Belmont, 147 App. Div. 118, 131 N. Y. Supp. 713. Application.-Matter of Tweedie Trading Co., 105 App. Div. 426, 94 N. Y. Supp. 167; McKenna v. Tully, 109 App. Div. 598, 96 N. Y. Supp. 561; Grant v. Greene Consolidated Copper Co., 118 App. Div. 853, 103 N. Y. Supp. 676; Hallenborg v. Greene, 120 App. Div. 813, 105 N. Y. Supp. 664; Koplin v. Hoe, 123 App. Div. 827, 108 N. Y. Supp. 602; Bradley v. Bradley, 137 App. Div. 751, 122 N. Y. Supp. 626; Methertz v. Goldschmidt Bros. Co., 64 Misc. 460, 463, 118 N. Y. Supp. 610; Roberts v. Ogdensburg & L. C. R. Co., 29 Hun 154; Jenkins v. Putnam, 106 N. Y. 272; Matter of Davies, 168 N. Y. 89; Davidson v. City of New York, 221 N. Y. 487; Green v. Middlesex Valley R. Co., 31 App. Div. 412, 53 N. Y. Supp. 500; People ex rel. Morse v. Nussbaum, 55 App. Div. 245, 67 N. Y. Supp. 492, revd. on other grounds, 168 N. Y. 89; Matter of Wright, Peters & Co., 73 App. Div. 75, 76 N. Y. Supp. 775; Gee v. Pendas, 87 App. Div. 157, 84 N. Y. Supp. 32; Metera v. Foster Paving Block Co., 171 App. Div. 957, 155 N. Y. Supp. 760; Bender v. Bork, 52 Misc. 295, 102 N. Y. Supp. 152; Smith v. Servis, 59 Hun 552, 13 N. Y. Supp. 941; Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Underwood, 90 Hun 342, 35 N. Y. Supp. 693; Matter of Weil, 25 App. Div. 173, 49 N. Y. Supp. 133; Matter of Anthony & Co., 42 App. Div. 66, 58 N. Y. Supp. 907; Matter of White, 44 App. Div. 119, 60 N. Y. Supp. 702; Long Island Bottlers' Union v. Bottling Brewers, 65 App. Div. 459, 72 N. Y. Supp. 976; Schwarz v. Robinson, 129 App. Div. 404, 113 N. Y. Supp. 995; Matter of Singer, 40 Misc. 561, 82 N. Y. Supp. 870; A. K. Hurst v. National Starch Co., 64 Misc. 445, 119 N. Y. Supp. 511; Davidson v. City of New York, 221 N. Y. 487. Municipal corporations.-Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New York, 149 App. Div. 491, 134 N. Y. Supp. 50; Davidson v. City of New York, 175 App. Div. 969, 161 N. Y. Supp. 1006. Surrogate's court. People ex rel. Lewis v. Fowler, 229 N. Y. 84; People ex rel. Lewis v. Fowler, 189 App. Div. 335, 178 N. Y. Supp. 500; Matter of Hodgman, 113 Misc. 215, 184 N. Y. Supp. 185;Matter of Carter, 193 App. Div. 355, 184 N. Y. Supp. 39. Examination of proponent of will before trial denied.-Matter of Hodgman, 107 Misc. 70, 175 N. Y. Supp. 608; People ex rel. Lewis v. Fowler, 107 Misc. 253, 176 N. Y. Supp. 806. Nonresidents.-Wallace v. Bacon, 143 App. Div. 211, 128 N. Y. Supp. 130; Wolf v. Union Waxed & Parchment Paper Co., 148 App. Div. 623, 133 N. Y. Supp. 239; Meinig Co. v. United States Fastener Co., 194 App. Div. 397, 185 N. Y. Supp. 320. Right to examination.-Shonts v. Thomas, 116. Beckel v. Salomon, 189 App. Div. 310, 178 N. Y. Supp. 209. Examination not limited to affirmative cause of action. Herbage v. City of Utica, 109 N. Y. 80. Depositions during trial.-Hebron v. Work, 101 App. Div. 463, 92 N. Y. Supp. 149; Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co., 111 App. Div. 526, 97 N. Y. Supp. 1078. Purpose of examination.-Bock v. Bock, 130 App. Div. 229, 114 N. Y. Supp. 473. Purpose of examination after issue Joined.— Whitley v. Speed, 171 App. Div. 102, 156 N. Y. Supp. 973. To perpetuate testimony.-Matter of Moto Bloc Import Co., 140 App. Div. 532, 125 N. Y. Supp. 427. Examination in order to frame complaint.Heye v. American Chemical Education Co., 185 App. Div. 13, 172 N. Y. Supp. 622. Examination to frame complaint and after Issue Joined distinguished.-Matter of Gardner, 124 App. Div. 654, 109 N. Y. Supp. 95; Frear v. Duryea, 151 App. Div. 687, 136 N. Y. Supp. 264. Examination to file bill of particulars.-Evening Herald Co. v. Kilmer, 172 App. Div. 687, 159 N. Y. Supp. 251; Larree v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co., 161 N. Y. Supp. 877. Granted with liberality.-Herzig v. Washington Fire Ins. Co., 144 App. Div. 174, 128 N. Y. Supp. 988; Beahl v. Greenbaum, 102 Misc. 623, 169 N. Y. Supp. 179. Good faith of applicant.-Wallace v. Bacon, 143 App. Div. 211, 214, 128 N. Y. Supp. 130; Vogel Co. v. Backer Construction Co., 148 App. Div. 639, 133 N. Y. Supp. 225. Time of application.-Frear v. Druryea, 151 App. Div. 687, 136 N. Y. Supp. 264. Second examination.-Pratt v. Bray, 10 Misc. 445, 31 N. Y. Supp. 465; Lawrence v. Samuels, 20 Misc. 278, 45 N. Y. Supp. 743; Dambmann v. Butterfield, 15 Hun 495; Skinner v. Steele, 88 Hun 307, 34 N. Y. Supp. 748. Subsequent amendment of pleadings.-Ward V. Anderson & Co., 191 App. Div. 608, 181 N. Y. Supp. 659. Application in second department for examination of adverse party before trial.-Oshinsky v. Gumberg, 188 App. Div. 23, 176 N. Y. Supp. 406. Affidavit, by whom made.-Ziegler v. Lamb, 5 App. Div. 47, 40 N. Y. Supp. 65; Orne v. Greene, 74 App. Div. 404, 77 N. Y. Supp. 475; Treadwell v. Greene, No. 2, 87 App. Div. 425, 84 N. Y. Supp. 557; Reed v. Smith, 122 App. Div. 795, 107 N. Y. Supp. 988; New York Press Club v. Lloyd, 12 Misc. 210, 34 N. Y. Supp. 24; Railroad Age & Northwestern Railroader v. Pryibil, 18 Misc. 561, 42 N. Y. Supp. 697; Doyle v. Kimball, 23 Misc. 431, 52 N. Y. Supp. 195; Matter of Darling, 31 Misc. 543, 64 N. Y. Supp. 793; Hale v. Rogers, 22 Hun 19; Bank of Pittsburgh v. Murphy, 18 N. Y. Supp. 575. Affidavit by managing clerk.-Silverman v. Ware, 189 App. Div. 216, 178 N. Y. Supp. 520. Sufficiency of affidavit generally.-Grant v. Greene, 118 App. Div. 850, 103 N. Y. Supp. 674; Donaldson v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 119 App. Div. 513, 104 N. Y. Supp. 178; Boskowitz v. Sulzbacher, 121 App. Div. 878, 106 N. Y. Supp. 865; Loewy v. Gordon, 129 App. Div. 459, 114 N. Y. Supp. 211; Bock v. Bock, 130 App. Div. 229, 114 N. Y. Supp. 473; Hagerty v. Pinelawn Cemetery, 138 App. Div. 905, 122 N. Y. Supp. 943; Rappolt v. Baring, 139 App. Div. 132, 123 N. Y. Supp. 795; American Woolen Co. v. Altkrug, 139 App. Div. 671, 124 N. Y. Supp. 203; Kornbluth v. Isaacs, 149 App. Div. 108, 133 N. Y. Supp. 737; Oppenheimer v. Van Raalte, 151 App. Div. 601, 136 N. Y. Supp. 197; United States Drainage Co. v. Hawley, 166 App. Div. 942, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1148; Behl v. Greenbaum, 183 App. Div. 238, 171 N. Y. Supp. 129; Central Trust Co. v. Weidenfeld, 183 App. Div. 375, 170 N. Y. Supp. 767; Ehrick v. Winter & Co., 52 Misc. 641, 104 N. Y. Supp. 866; Ketcham v. Rowland & Shafto, 71 Misc. 439, 128 N. Y. Supp. 695; Brisbane v. Brisbane, 20 Hun 48; Fogg v. Fisk, 30 Hun 61; Feuchtwanger v. Dessar, 52 Hun 611, 5 N. Y. Supp. 129; Lord Construction Co. v. Edison Portland Cement Co., 189 App. Div. 886, 178 N. Y. Supp. 250. Allegations on information and belief.-McCready v. Haight, 22 App. Div. 632, 48 N. Y. Supp. 39; Blatchford v. Paine, 24 App. Div. 140, 48 N. Y. Supp. 783; Tannenbaum v. Lindeheim, 54 App. Div. 188, 66 N. Y. Supp. 375; Boskowitz v. Sulzbacher, 121 App. Div. 878, 106 N. Y. Supp. 865; Mitchell v. Cent. Mines Development Co., 124 App. Div. 325, 108 N. Y. Supp. 953; Drake v. Weinman & Co., 12 Misc. 65, 33 N. Y. Supp. 177; Matter of Atty.-Gen., 21 Misc. 101, 47 N. Y. Supp. 20, affd., 22 App. Div. 285, 47 N. Y. Supp. 883; Rosenbaum v. Rice, 36 Misc. 410, 73 N. Y. Supp. 714; Davis Machine Co. v. Robinson, 42 Misc. 52, 85 N. Y. Supp. 574; Matter of Bronson, 78 Hun 351, 29 N. Y. Supp. 112. Pleadings as affidavits.-Wallace v. Bacon, 143 App. Div. 211, 128 N. Y. Supp. 130. Materiality and necessity of testimony.-Lewisohn Brothers v. Huller, 6 App. Div. 459, 39 N. Y. Supp. 570; Presby v. Public Opinion Co., 6 App. Div. 600, 39 N. Y. Supp. 957; Kessler v. Levy & Lewis Co., 7 App. Div. 142, 40 N. Y. Supp. 271; Fiske v. Smith, 9 App. Div. 208, 41 N. Y. Supp. 176; Leary v. Rice, 15 App. Div. 397, 44 N. Y. Supp. 82; Jiminez v. Ward, 21 App. Div. 387, 47 N. Y. Supp. 557; Naab v. Stewart, 32 App. Div. 478, 52 N. Y. Supp. 1094; Leach v. Haight, 34 App. Div. 522, 54 N. Y. Supp. 550; Schmerber v. Reinach, 38 App. Div. 622, 58 N. Y. Supp. 84; Hay v. Zeiger, 50 App. Div. 462, 64 N. Y. Supp. 202; York v. Dick, 61 App. Div. 620, 70 N. Y. Supp. 614; Johnson v. New Home Sew. Mach. Co., 62 App. Div. 157, 70 N. Y. Supp. 875; Insurance Press v. Montauk Fire-Detecting Wire Co., 70 App. Div. 50, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1093; Corn Exchange Bank v. Lorillard, 84 App. Div. 194, 82 N. Y. Supp. 641; Matter of Ellett v. Young, 95 App. Div. 417, 88 N. Y. Supp. 661; Oakes v. Star Co., 119 App. Div. 358, 104 N. Y. Supp. 244; Waitzfelder v. Moses Sons & Co., 120 App. Div. 144, 104 N. Y. Supp. 796; Ehrich v. Root, 122 App. Div. 719, 107 N. Y. Supp. 846; Cherbuliez v. Parsons, 123 App. Div. 814, 108 N. Y. Supp. 321; Diefendorf v. Fenn, 125 App. Div. 651, 110 N. Y. Supp. 68; Irving v. Higgins, 131 App. Div. 184, 115 N. Y. Supp. 254; Reynolds v. Callan, 134 App. Div. 732, 119 N. Y. Supp. 135; Reusens v. Arkenburgh, 136 App. Div. 653, 121 N Y. Supp. 353; Schuler v. Woodward, 137 App. Div. 576, 122 N. Y. Supp. 404; Higgins v. New York Dock Co., 137 App. Div. 823, 122 N. Y. Supp. 465; Bergstrom v. Ridgway Co., 138 App. Div. 178, 123 N. Y. Supp. 29; Lawson v. Hotchkiss, 140 App. Div. 297, 125 N. Y. Supp. 261; Kornbluth v. Isaacs, 149 App. Div. 108, 133 N. Y. Supp. 737; Del Genovese v. Del Genovese, 149 App. Div. 266, 133 N. Y. Supp. 765; Terry v. Ross Heater Mfg. Co., 180 App. Div. 714, 167 N. Y. Supp. 747; Pratt v. Bray, 10 Misc. 445, 31 N. Y. Supp. 465; Maitland v. Central Gas & Electric Co., 13 Misc. 324, 34 N. Y. Supp. 464; Matter of Gains, 15 Misc. 75, 36 N. Y. Supp. 1113; Lowenthal v. Leonard, 20 Misc. 420, 45 N. Y. Supp. 1031; Burnett v. Mitchell, 26 Misc. 547, 57 N. Y. Supp. 474; Obregan v. De Lima, 35 Misc. 850, 72 N. Y. Supp 1121; Elmes v. Duke, 39 Misc. 244, 79 N. Y. Supp. 425; Hart v. American Cotton Co., 41 Misc. 436, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1065; Weidenfeld v. Hollins, 41 Misc. 439, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1084; Davis Machine Co. v. Robinson, 42 Misc. 52, 85 N. Y. Supp. 574; Koppel v. Hatch, 50 Misc. 626, 98 N. Y. Supp. 619; Van Ripper v. Ray, 87 Misc. 445, 150 N. Y. Supp. 947; Cook v. People's Milk Co., 90 Misc. 34, 152 N. Y. Supp. 465; Lesen Advertising Agency v. Perkins, 93 Misc. 516, 157 N. Y. Supp. 304; Sprague v. Butterworth, 22 Hun 502; Fogg v. Fisk, 30 Hun 61; Fourth Nat. Bank v. Boynton, 29 Hun 441; Wayne County Savings Bank Co. v. Brackett, 31 Hun 434; Williams v. Folsom, 52 Hun 68, 5 N. Y. Supp. 211; Strakosch v. Press Publishing Co., 53 Hun 503, 6 N. Y. Supp. 246; Howe v. Learey, 62 Hun 240, 16 N. Y. Supp. 736; Bigler v. Duryee, 73 Hun 556, 26 N. Y. Supp. 112; Abbott-Downing Co. v. Faber, 87 Hun 299, 34 N. Y. Supp. 433; Kramer v. Kramer, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1049; Pfeifer v. McNally, 163 N. Y. Supp. 577. Names and residences.-Dennis v. Tebbetts, 29 Misc. 600, 61 N. Y. Supp. 503; Matter of Cohen, 52 Misc. 400, 104 N. Y. Supp. 1027; Waller v. Lyon, 30 Hun 84; Simmons v. Hazard, 65 Hun 612, 20 N. Y. Supp. 508; Depierris v. Slaven, 74 Hun 628, 26 N. Y. Supp. 970; Tubbiolo v. Watkins, 192 App. Div. 925, 182 N. Y. Supp. 955. Names and addresses of attorneys.-Miller v. W. K. Jahn Co., 104 Misc. 370, 172 N. Y. Supp. 219. Proposed defendant.-Matter of Anthony & Co., 42 App. Div. 66, 58 N. Y. Supp. 907; Matter of White, 44 App. Div. 119, 60 N. Y. Supp. 702; Matter of Singer, 40 Misc. 561, 82 N. Y. Supp. 870; Muller v. Levy, 52 Hun 123, 5 N. Y. Supp. 118. Persons not parties.-Town of Hancock v. First Nat. Bank, 93 N. Y. 82; F. L. & T. Co. v. Siefke, 144 N. Y, 354; Montgomery v. Knickerbocker, 14 App. Div. 629. 43 N. Y. Supp. 787; Johnson v. New Home Sew. Mach. Co., 62 App. Div. 157, 70 N. Y. Supp. 875; Muldoon v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 98 App. Div. 169, 91 N. Y. Supp. 65; Diefendorf v. Fenn, 125 App. Div. 651, 110 N. Y. Supp. 68; Vaughan v. Schenker, 139 App. Div. 15, 123 N. Y. Supp. 535; American Woolen Co. v. Altkrug, 139 App. Div. 671, 124 N. Y. Supp. 203; Bernstein v. Solomon, 140 App. Div. 316, 125 N. Y. Supp. 225; Matter of Moto Bloc Import Co., 140 App. Div. 532, 125 N. Y. Supp. 427; Trotter v. Brevort, 29 Misc. 662, 61 N. Y. Supp. 181; Hay v. Zeiger, 30 Misc. 35, 61 N. Y. Supp. 647, revd. on other grounds, 50 App. Div. 462, 64 N. Y. Supp. 202; Reichmann v. Manhattan Co., 26 Hun 433; Duncan v. Jones, 32 Hun 13. "About to depart from the state."-Stapleton v. La Shelle, 124 App. Div. 661, 109 N. Y. Supp. 446; Warner v. Dockendorff, 180 App. Div. 72, 167 N. Y. Supp. 247; Rudini v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., 91 Misc. 486, 155 N. Y. Supp. 301. Cause of action.-Herbage v. City of Utica, 109 N. Y. 81; Merritt v. Williamson, 27 App. Div. 121, 50 N. Y. Supp. 113; Tanenbaum v. Whiffer, 43 App. Div. 194, 59 N. Y. Supp. 317; Boyd v. McGuire, 137 App. Div. 937, 122 N. Y. Supp. 263; Continental Securities Co. v. Belmont, 147 App. Div. 118, 131 N. Y. Supp. 713; Wahle v. McMillan, 2 Misc. 343, 21 N. Y. Supp. 1012; Matter |