Reading Deconstruction/Deconstructive ReadingDeconstruction—a mode of close reading associated with the contemporary philosopher Jacques Derrida and other members of the "Yale School"—is the current critical rage, and is likely to remain so for some time. Reading Deconstruction / Deconstructive Reading offers a unique, informed, and badly needed introduction to this important movement, written by one of its most sensitive and lucid practitioners. More than an introduction, this book makes a significant addition to the current debate in critical theory. G. Douglas Atkins first analyzes and explains deconstruction theory and practice. Focusing on such major critics and theorists as Derrida, J. Hillis Miller, and Geoffrey Hartman, he brings to the fore issues previously scanted in accounts of deconstruction, especially its religious implications. Then, through close readings of such texts as Religio Laici, A Tale of a Tub, and An Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot, he proceeds to demonstrate and exemplify a mode of deconstruction indebted to both Derrida and Paul de Man. This skillfully organized book, designed to reflect the "both/ and" nature of deconstruction, thus makes its own contribution to deconstructive practice. The important readings provided of Dryden, Swift, and Pope are among the first to treat major Augustan texts from a deconstructive point of view and make the book a valuable addition to the study of that period. Well versed in deconstruction, the variety of texts he treats, and major issues of current concern in literary study, Atkins offers in this book a balanced and judicious defense of deconstruction that avoids being polemical, dogmatic, or narrowly ideological. Whereas much previous work on and in deconstruction has been notable for its thick prose, jargon, and general obfuscation, this book will be appreciated for its clarity and grace, as well as for its command of an impressively wide range of texts and issues. Without taming it as an instrument of analysis and potential change, Atkins makes deconstruction comprehensible to the general reader. His efforts will interest all those concerned with literary theory and criticism, Augustan literature, and the relation of literature and religion. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 18
... argue at some length in the fourth chapter below, Miller himself rejects such either/or thinking (even if, as I point out in “The Story of Error,” inevitable lapses occasionally occur). At any rate, an intervention, deconstruction ...
... (arguing that it is parasitically encased in metaphysics), and though I shall return to the issue in treating Miller in chapter 4, I wish here to consider the question of nihilism in Derrida, hoping that we will emerge with a better ...
... argues, serves to make us think that totalization and meaningfulness are possible, comforting us with reassurances regarding a “cosmic continuum.”30 But still the gap remains, no matter how hard we try to close it. The humanistic ...
... tradition, the Yahwistprophetic, arguing that Derrida's work is consonant with the biblical message, which always goes counter to the mythological sense of a “cosmic continuum.” Derridean deconstruction, according to.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
The Recent Work | |
J Hillis Miller Deconstruction and the Recovery | |
The Story of Error | |
The Question of Interpretive | |
Will and Willing in A Tale | |
The Play of Difference in Popes | |