 ... out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly ne traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause, and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative...  The Workmen's Compensation Law Journal - Page 382edited by - 1920Full view - About this book
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 848 pages
...employment, then it arises 'out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate...from the employment. The causative danger must be 88 AT. JL Hulley v. Moosbrugger. peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must be... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 818 pages
...employment, then it arises 'out of the employment. But it excludes an injury, which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate...cause and which comes from a hazard to "which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 720 pages
...the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment....incidental to the character of the business and not imlepend- . ent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 694 pages
...employment, then it arises out of the employment, but it excludes an injury which cannot be fairly traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar... | |
 | Law - 1921 - 510 pages
...the employment, then it arises out of the employment. This excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate...workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.8 An accident arises in the course of the employment if it takes place while the employee... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 1226 pages
...employment, then it arises 'out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 1156 pages
...employment, then it 'arises out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause, and which comes from a hazard to which th« workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative Jauger must be... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1228 pages
...different language, In Ютbol v. Industrial Accident Commission, supra, a part of the statement being: "The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood." When measured by the standards set down in these cases, it is not difficult to satisfactorily conclude... | |
 | Connecticut - Connecticut - 1917 - 1198 pages
...compensation. This case also lays down the principle that the hazard which gives rise to compensation must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. That the Act may benefit one doing something not in the strict line of his duty but incidental to his... | |
 | Labor - 1913 - 1314 pages
...employment, then it arises out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which can not fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate...the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must oe incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant.... | |
| |
