thegode prieste Thomas Rowley.' Horace Walpole was engaged in writing the History of British Painters,' and Chatterton sent him an account of eminent 'Carvellers and Peyncters,' who once flourished in Bristol. His impositions duped the citizens of Bristol. Chatterton had no confidant in his labours; he toiled in secret, gratified only by the stoical pride of talent.' He frequently wrote by moonlight, conceiving that the immediate presence of that luminary added to the inspiration. His Sundays were commonly spent in walking alone into the country about Bristol, and drawing sketches of churches and other objects. He would also lie down on the meadows in view of St. Mary's Church, Bristol, fix his eyes upon the ancient edifice, and seem as if he were in a kind of trance. Though correct and orderly in his conduct, Chatterton, before he was sixteen, imbibed principles of infidelity, and the idea of suicide was familiar to his mind. It was, however, overruled for a time by his passion for literary fame and distinction. It was a favourite maxim with him, that man is equal to anything, and that everything might be achieved by diligence and abstinence. In the muniment room of St. Mary Redcliffe Church of Bristol, several chests had been anciently deposited. These were broken open by an order from proper authority, some ancient deeds taken out, and the remaining manuscripts left exposed as of no value. Chatterton gave out that he had found many writings of Mr. Canynge, and of Thomas Rowley-the friend of Canynge-a priest of the fifteenth century. The fictitious poems were published in the 'Town and Country Magazine,' to which Chatterton had become a contributor, and occasioned a warm controversy among literary antiquaries. Some of them he had submitted to Horace Walpole, who shewed them to Gray and Mason; but these competent judges pronounced them to be forgeries. After three years spent in the attorney's office, Chatterton obtained his release from his apprenticeship, and went to London, where he engaged in various tasks for the booksellers, and wrote for the magazines and newspapers. He obtained an introduction to Beckford, the patriotic and popular lord-mayor, and his own inclinations led him to espouse the opposition party. But no money,' he says, 'is to be got on that side of the question; interest is on the other side. But he is a poor author who cannot write on both sides.' He boasted that his company was courted everywhere, and that he would settle the nation before he had done.' The splendid visions of promotion and wealth, however, soon vanished and even his labours for the periodical press failed to afford him the means of comfortable subsistence. He applied for the appointment of a surgeon's mate to Africa, but was refused the necessary recommendation. This seems to have been his last hope, and he made no further effort at literary composition. His spirits had always been unequal, alternately gloomy and elevated---both in extremes; he had cast off the restraints of religion, and had no steady principle to guide him, unless it was a strong affection for his mother and sister, to whom he sent remittances of money, while his means lasted. Habit of intemperance, succeeded by fits of remorse, exasperated his constitutional melancholy; and after being reduced to actual want-though with characteristic pride he rejected a dinner offered him by his landlady (a Mrs. Angel, sack-maker, No. 4 Brook Street, Holborn), the day before his death-he tore all his papers, and destroyed himself by taking arsenic, August 25, 1770. At the time of his death he was aged seventeen years, nine months and a few days. 'No English poet,' says Campbell, 'ever equalled him at the same age.' The remains of the unhappy youth were interred in a shell in the burying-ground of Shoe-Lane workhouse. His unfinished papers he had destroyed before his death, and his room, when broken open, was found covered with scraps of paper. The citizens of Bristol have erected a monument to the memory of their native poet. The poems of Chatterton, published under the name of Rowley, consist of the tragedy of 'Ella,' the Execution of Sir Charles Bawdin,' the 'Battle of Hastings,' the Tournament,' one or two Dialogues, and a description of Canynge's Feast. Some of them, as the roundelay to Ælla (which we subjoin), have exactly the air of modern poetry, only disguised with antique spelling and phraseology. The avowed compositions of Chatterton are equally inferior to the forgeries in poetical powers and diction; which is satisfactorily accounted for by Sir Walter Scott by the fact, that his whole powers and energies must, at his early age, have been converted to the acquisition of the obsolete language and peculiar style necessary to support the deeplaid deception. He could have had no time for the study of our modern poets, their rules of verse, or modes of expression; while his whole faculties were intensely employed in the Herculean task of creating the person, history, and language of an ancient poet, which, vast as these faculties were, were sufficient wholly to engross, though not to overburden them.' A power of picturesque painting seems to be Chatterton's most distinguishing feature as a poet. The heroism of Sir Charles Bawdin, who Summed the actions of the day Each night before he slept, and who bearded the tyrant king on his way to the scaffold, is perhaps his most striking portrait. The following description of Morning in the tragedy of 'Eila,' is in the style of the old poets: Bright sun had in his ruddy robes been dight, A description of Spring in the same poem: The budding floweret blushes at the light, The meads be sprinkled with the yellow hue, The fresh young cowslip bendeth with the dew; The trees enleafed, into heaven straight, When gentle winds do blow, to whistling din is brought. The ruddy welkin shineth to the eyne, Around the ale-stake minstrels sing the song, Young ivy round the door-post doth entwine; Albeit all is fair, there lacketh something still. In the epistle to Canynge, Chatterton has a striking censure of the religious interludes which formed the early drama; but the idea, as Warton remarks, is the result of that taste and discrimination which could only belong to a more advanced period of society : Plays made from holy tales I hold unmeet; When as a man we God in Jesus treat, In my poor mind we do the Godhead wrong. Archbishop Trench has shewn that the whole fabric of Chatterton's literary imposture could have been blown up by one short, monosyllable of three letters, the word its. This word did not find its way into our literature until two hundred years after the period of Chatterton's monk Rowley. It occurs only once in our translation of the Scriptures (Levit. xxv. 5), and only three times, Archbishop Trench says, in all Shakspeare. Even Milton, in describing Satan, says His form had not yet lost All her original brightness. The satirical and town effusions of Chatterton are often in bad taste, yet display a wonderful command of easy language and lively sportive allusion. They have no traces of juvenility, unless it be in adopting the vulgar scandals of the day, unworthy his original genius. In his satire of Kew Gardens' are the following lines, alluding to the poet-laureate and the proverbial poverty of poets: ་ Though sing-song Whitehead ushers in the year; With joy to Britain's king and sovereign dear, Measures his syllables into an ode: Yet such the scurvy merit of his muse, He bows to deans. and licks his lordship's shoes. Then leave the wicked barren way of rhyme, Fly far from poverty, be wise in time: Regard the office more, Parnassus less, Put your religion in a decent dress: Then may your interest in the town advance, In a poem, entitled 'The Prophecy,' are some vigorous stanzas, in a different measure, and remarkable for maturity and freedom of style: The Prophecy, a When civil power shall snore at ease; Political Satire. Commerce o'er Bondage will prevail, Your tenants holding at your will; The boy who could thus write at sixteen, might soon have proved a Swift or a Dryden. Yet in satire, Chatterton evinced but a small part of his power. His Rowleian poems have a compass of invention, and a luxuriance of fancy, that promised a great chivalrous or allegorical poet of the style of Spenser. Bristow Tragedy, or the Death of Sir Charles Bawdin.* The feathered songster, Chanticleer, And told the early villager The coming of the morn: King Edward saw the ruddy streaks And heard the raven's croaking throat Sir Canterlone then bended low, But when he came, his children twain, With briny tears did wet the floor, "Thou 'rt right,' quoth he, 'for by the "O good Sir Charles,' said Canterlone, God That sits enthroned on high! Charles Bawdin, and his fellows twain, Then with a jug of nappy ale His knights did on him wait; 'Go tell the traitor, that to-day He leaves this mortal state." Bad tidings I do bring.' 'Speak boldly, man,' said brave Sir Charles; 'What says the traitor-king?' 'I grieve to tell: before yon sun Does from the welkin fly, He hath upon his honour sworn *The antiquated orthography affected by Chatterton being an impediment to their being generally read. we dismiss it in this and other specimens. The diction is. in reality, almost purely modern. and Chatterton's spelling in a great measure arbitrary, so that there seems no longer any reason for retaining what was only designed at first as a means of supporting a deception. By Mary, and all saints in heaven, With heart brimful of gnawing grief, 'We all must die,' said brave Sir Charles; 'Say why, my friend, thy honest soul Saith godly Canynge: 'I do weep, That thou so soon must die, And leave thy sons and helpless wife; "Tis this that wets mine eye.' |