Page images
PDF
EPUB

213

100 279, 282

95 8, 62, 87, 95, 121, 307 103, 106, 108, 198, 216

316

95 116 229

Baldwin v. York, 71–463,
Ball, Johnson v., 74–355,
Ballard v. Ballard, 75--190,.
Ballard, Merwin v., 66–398,
Ballard, Merwin v., 65–168,
Bannister, McAden, V., 63_478,
Bank of Fayetteville, Bates v. 65–81,.
Bank of Charlotte v., Britton, 66—365,.
Bank v. Charlotte, 75—45.......
Bank of Cape Fear, Clerk's office v., 66--214,
Bank v. Foote, 77--131,...
Bank v. Jenkins, 64-719,..
Bank of New-Berne, Perry v. 70--309,
Bank, Rand v., 77--152,
Bank v. Tiddy, 67--169,
Bank of Lexington, Wilson and Shober V., 72—621,
Barham v. Lomax, 73–76,
Barlow v. Norfleet, 72–535,.
Barnes, Dunn v., 73–273,
Barnes v. Piedmont Insurance Company, 7422,
Barnett, Baldwin v.,71-163,.
Barnhardt, Kirk v., 7453,
Barnhill, Wilson v., 64–121,
Barrett v. Richardson, 76--129,
Barringer v. Barringer, 69--179,.
Batchelor, Brodie v., 75-51,..
Bates v. Bank of Fayetteville, 65-81,
Bates v. Lilly, 65—232,
Battte v. Davis, 66 –252,
Battle v. McIver, 63--167,
Battle, R. R. Co. v., 66—540,
Batts v. Winstead, 77-238,
Baurman, Richards v., 65—162,..
Baxter v. Baxter, 77–118,
Beach, Woodfin v., 70—155,
Beaman, Lee v., 73-410,
Bear v. Cohen, 65–511,..
Beaty, Land Co, V., 69-329,
Beavan v. Speed, 74–544,
Bell v. Chadwick, 71–329,
Bell v. King, 70—330,
Bellamy v. Pippin, 744-46,
Belmont v. The Auditor, 71---260,
Benbow, McAdoo v., 63-461,
Benbow v. Robbins, 71—338,
Benedict v. Hall, 76--113,
Bennett, Crummen v., 68-494,
Berry, Thompson v., 64–79,.
Berry, Thompson v., 64-81,
Bibb, Foreman v., 65—128,
Biggs, Capehart v., 77-261,
Biggs v. Williams, 66- 127,
Bitting v. Thaxton, 71-299,
Bitting v. Thaxton, 72–511,
Black, Brink v., 77–59,.
Blackburn, Commissioners Forsythe v., 68-106,

126 251, 252 228, 230

180 253

95 16, 31

196 93, 95, 104, 121, 179, 181, 182

95

182
.... 256, 257, 280)
133, 135, 143, 167

.243
278
243

316

65 268
55, 57, 176

298
154

16
159, 176
145, 155

162

105 .61, 104, 143, 149, 161, 173, 174 .93, 95, 112, 115

241
151

3

23

12 ..9, 73, 108, 315

352 133

240 ..70, 219, 292, 295 .295, 309, 321 .288, 321

156 ..55, 57 .91, 100

12, 101 ..196, 37

..... 10

و145

Blackledge, Murray v., 71–192,.

278 Blackwell v. Claywell, 75—213, Blackwell v. Willard, 65–555,..

105 Blake v. Askew, 76–325,

15 Blake v. Respass, 77—193,.

230 Blakely v. Patrick, 67—40, Blair, Cox V., 76-78,.. Bland v. O'Hagan, 61-471,.

257 Bledsoe v. Nixon, 69-81,

122, 258, 261 Bledsoe, People v., 68–457,.

301 Bledsoe v. State, 614-392,.

313 Bledsoe, Welker V., 68—157,

209 Blum, Sledge v., 63—374,

.158, 161, 250 Bobbitt, Jenkins v., 77–385,

.240, 241 Bond v. Bond, 69–97,.

234 Boner v. Adams, 65—639,

313 Bosher, Palmer v., 71--291,

167, 168 Bosher, Palmer v., 72—371,

173 Bostick, Durham v., 72-353,..

98, 99, 242 Bowden, Faison v., 74-13,..

16, 51 Boykin v. Boykin, 70---262,

277 Boylston Ins. Co. v. Davis, 68--17,

146, 169 Boyle, Webb v., 63—271,... Boylston Ins. Co., v. Davis, 71-78, Bradford v. Coit, 77-72,

120 Bradley v. Jones, 76–204,

258 Bradway, Windley v., 77–333,

83, 167 Branch, Ex parte, 72–106,

2+1 Brandon v. Phelps, 77-H, Braswell, Knight v., 71-709,.

.16, 31, 31, 51 Brem, McCorkle v., 76—107,..

1.55 Brumble v. Brown, 71 513,..

257 Brindle v. Herron, 68--496,

108 Brink v. Black, 77–59,

106, 257 Britton, Bank of Charlotte v., 66–365,

95 Brodie v. Batchelor, 75–51,..

2:13 Brown, Armfield v., 70--27,

183, 188, 193, 197, 199, 202, 203, 201, 276 Brown, Brumble v., 71-513,

237 Brown v. Foust, 61-672,

179 Brown v. Hawkins, 65—615,

107, 174 Brower, Hess v., 76—128,

167 Brown v Hoover, 77-10,

213 Brown, Isler v., 66-556,

310 Brown, Isler v., 69---12,

124 Brown v. Turner, 70--93,

55, 298, 299 Bryan, Haywood v., 63—521,.

196, 315 Bryan v. Heck, 67–322,

252 Bryan v. Hubbs, 69—423,

.80, 108, 151, 210, 218, 251, 264, 316, 317 Bryan, Walston v., 64 -761,.

.9), 229 Bryan, Winburne v., 73--17,

,195, 253 Bryant v. Morris, 69–414,

250 Bryce, Skinner v., 75— 287,

125 Bryson, Shulen v., 65—201,.

172 Buie y. Building & Loan Association, 74-117,.. Buie, Howell v., 61–416,.....

16 Building & Loan Association, Buie v., 74-117,..

Bullard v. Johnston, 65—436,

122 Bullock, State v., 63 570,..

253 Bumpass v. Chambers, 77 - 357, Burgwyn, Jacobs v., 63—196,..

198, 265 Burke v. Stokely, 65–569,.

124 Burnett, Baldwin v., 71 463,...

155 Burnett v. Nicholson, 72–334,.

351 Burns v. Asheworth, 72-496,

..95, 98, 99, 113 Burton v. Wilkes, 66—604,

101 Burwell v. Lafferty, 76–383,

84, 160 Burwell, Harris v., 65.—584,.....

55, 100 Bushee v. Surles, 77-62,.

34, 282 Byers, Carleton v., 71-331,..

263 Cable & Ross v. Thorn, 72—121,

242 Cain v. Nicholson, 70-411,..

203, 204 Caldwell, Maxwell v., 72-450,

252 Calloway, Miazza v., 74–31,. Calloway, Privett v., 75—233, Calvert, Baggerly v., 70–688.

51 Calvert v. Williams, 61 - 168,

41 Campbell v. Allison, 63-568,

255, 256 Campbell v. Wolfenden, 74- 103,

155 Candler, Sumner v., 74-265,

60 Capehart v. Biggs, 77—261,

156 Cardwell v. Cardwell, 61-621,.

23 Carleton v. Byers, 71-331,.

203 Carleton v. Sloan, 61–702,

138 Carney v. Whitehurst, 61-426,.

. 15, 333 C. C. R. R. Co., Threadgill v., 73–178,.

301 Caroon v. Cooper, 63--386,.

330 Carr, State v., 71-106,.

242 Carroll v. Haywood, 61-481,

251 Carson v. Mills, 69—122,

110 Carson v. Oates, 61–115,.

226 Carter, Jerkins v., 704500,

3 Carver, Sedberry v., 77—319,

138 Castleberry, Green v., 70-20,

.189. 198, 199, 201, 202, 203 Cauble, State v., 70–62,

122 Chadwick, Bell v., 71-329,

154 Chambers, Bumpass v., 77--357, Chambers, McConnaughey v., 64284,

41, 95 Chambers v. Penland, 74—340,.

213 Chapman, Swepson v., 63--130..

81 Chappell, Allen v., 76—287,

316 Charles v. Kennedy, 61--12,..

86 Charlotte, Bank v., 75—45,...

116 Charlotte & 8. C. R. R. Co., Graham V., 61-631, Charlotte & Rutherford R. R. Co., Graham v., 61–631,

61 Chasteen, Martin v., 75–96,

259 Chatham, Reid v., 75–86,.

29 Cheatham v. Jones, 68—153,

241 Chesebro, Bahnson v., 77---3:25.

134 Cheshire, Garrett v., 69—396,

240 Childs v. Martin, 68—307,.

253 Childs v. Martin, 68—308,.

288 Chipley, Simonton v., 64—152,..

252

94, 99

Chipman, Sumner v., 65—623,

98, 114 Chisholm, McLenan v., 61–323,

257 Church v. Furniss, 64-659,..

288 Churchill v. Lee, 77—341,.

186 City of Charlotte, Farmer's & Merchant's Bank v., 75–45,. City of Raleigh, Tucker v., 75–267.

100 Chaflin v. Underwood, 75–485,

217 Clarke, Austin V., 70-458,

124 Clark v. Clark, 61—150.

98, 135, 143, 162 Clark, Com'rs of Bladen County v., 73—255,......

301 Clark, German v., 71–417,..

155 Clark v. Simonton, 65—525.

32 Clark v, Stanly, 66–59,

297 298 Clawson v. Wolfe, 77-100..

267 Clayton v. Jones, 68—197,

.180, 288 Clayton, Lusk v., 70--184,

200, 205 Clegg v. Soapstone Co., 66–391,

123, 183, 198 Clement v. State, 76–199,

318 Clements v State, 77–112,..

313 Clemons v. Hampton, 70--351..

52, 149, 251 Clerk's Office v. Bank of Cape Fear, 66--214,

229 Clerk's Office v. Huffsteller, 67-419,

1, 258, 265 Cobb, Wheeler v., 75—21.

... 67, 68, 164, 167 Coffield v. McNeill. 74–535..

87 Cohen, Bear v., 65–511...

.45, 104, 173, 174, 143, 149, 161 Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro', 77-2..

155 Cohen, Marsh v., 68-383..

102, 267 Cohen, Saulsbury v., 68-289.

261 Cohen, Seymour v., 67–315...

288 Coit, Bradford v., 77–72..

126 Coke, Dixon y., 77—205.

288 Cole, Long V., 72—2),

125, 288 Colgrove v. Koonce, 76_363.

. 16, 52 Collins, Er parte, 71–236,.

338 Commissioners of Asheville, Johnson v., 70—550,

151, 263 Commissioners of Bladen County v. Clarke, 73—255,

301 Commissioners Bladen, Jones 694412,

54 Commissioners Bladen, Jones v., 73–182,

86, 108 Commissioners Chatham County, Love v., 61–706..

81, 86, 88, 121 Commissioners Chatham County, Sedberry v.,

66–486,

246 Commissioners Cleaveland, Johnston v., 67—101,.....

54 Commissioners Craven, Mitchell v., 74–487,..

162 commissioners of Cumberland, Lutterloh v., 65—403,.

307 Commissioners of Davidson ,Lowe v., 70-532,

162 Commissioners Edgecombe, Daniel V., 74—194,.

25 Commissioners Forsythe, Blackburn v., 68 --406,.

102 ('ommissioners Goldsboro, Cohen v., 77—2,..

155 Commissioners Guilford, Hall v., 74-130,.

95 Commissioners of Jackson v. Addington, 68—254,.

266 Commissioners McDowell, Alexander v., 67-330,.

54 Commissioners Montgomery County, Mauney v., 71–486,.

151, 287 Commissioners of Montgomery County v. Riley, 75–144.

169, 240 Commissioners New Hanover County, McRae v., 74–415,

263 Commissioners Perquímans, Winslow v., 64-268

82, 228, 307 Commissioners of Raleigh, Pullen v., 68_451, Commissioners Richmond, Leak v., 64—132,..

85

[blocks in formation]

Commissioners Rutherford, Steele v., 70-137,..
Commissioners Wake County, Lewis v., 74--194,.
Commissioners Yancey v. Piercy 72–181,.
('ooper, Caroon v., 63_386,.....
Cooper, Gray v., 65–183,
Cooper, Vest V., 68---131,..
Conly, Jenkins V., 70—333,
Cornelius, Morrison v., 63-316,
Cotton, Mayho v., 69—289,
Covington v. Covington, 73–168,
Covington v. Stewart, 77—148,
Covington, Wall v., 76–1.50,
Cowan v. Baird, 77--201,
Cowles v. Hayes, 69—106,
Cox v. Blair, 76-78,
Cox v. Hamilton, 69–30,.
Cox v. Long, 69-7,..
Cox, Ruflin v., 71--253...
Cracoff v. Morehead, 67-422,
Craige, Hall v., 65-51......
Creecy v. Pearce, 69—67.
Cretcher v. McCadden, 61-262,
Cromartie, Abbott v., 72—292,
Cross, Johnson v., 66-167,
Crummen v. Bennett, 68—194,
('rump v. Mims, 61–767,
Crumpler, Daniel v., 75--181,
('ulver v. Eggers, 63-630,
Cunningham, So. Exp. Co. v. 67— 25,...
Cureton, Adams v., 74–523,...
Cureton, Davis v., 70–607,
Curlee v. Thomas, 74-51,...
Currin, Ragland v., 61—35),
Daniel v. Commissioners of Edgecombe, 77-191,
Daniel v. Crumpler, 7.3-181,..
Daniel v. Owen, 72---310,
Davidson v. Elems, 67–228,
Davis, Battle v., 66--232,
Davis, Boylston Insurance Company v., 68--17,
Davis, Boylston Insurance company v., 71–78,
Davis v. Cureton, 70-667,
Davis v. Fox, 69—135,.
Davis v. Hill, 75--221,
Davis, Shelton v., 69—324,
Davis, Tucker v., 78-330),
Davis, Woodsworth & McDowell v., 75--159,
Dawson, Austin v., 75--523,
Dawson, Flack v., 69--12,
Dawson v Petteway, 61-450,.
Day v. Howard, 73–1,..
Deal v. Palmer, 68—215,.
Deans, Hinton v., 75—18,
Debnam, Richardson v., 75 - 390,
Deep River Copper Company v. Martin, 70—300,
Dellinger v. Tweed, 66—206,

266

211 .240, 268

210

127 97, 221 100), 297

65 23, 42, 55

210

1

17 101, 221

125

57, 9.5 55, 57, 176 116, 169

8 331

[ocr errors]

196 93, 119

134

17

16, 31 62, 95, 100, 104, 108, 201

266

29 72, 122, 278

123, 265

172 210

« PreviousContinue »